The Cricket Thread
#916
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,867
From: north east england to south east queensland(cleveland in fact )WE WON THE CUP











#917
Neither side batted well against spin - they were just not as bad as us!
#918
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,867
From: north east england to south east queensland(cleveland in fact )WE WON THE CUP











#919
Yes, the posts stopped after SA had India in trouble on day 1 and no posts about England at all, going down 2-0 to Pakistan. Meanwhile someone beat someone else by over 200 runs in only losing 8 wickets for the match.
#922
Still a bit of daylight between S.A. and the rest. 
ICC rankings - Test, ODI, Twenty20 & Women rankings | ESPN Cricinfo

ICC rankings - Test, ODI, Twenty20 & Women rankings | ESPN Cricinfo
#924
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040











Still a bit of daylight between S.A. and the rest. 
ICC rankings - Test, ODI, Twenty20 & Women rankings | ESPN Cricinfo

ICC rankings - Test, ODI, Twenty20 & Women rankings | ESPN Cricinfo
#926
Let's just see what the rankings say after SA have played India 3 more times and Australia has played NZ twice more and Windies 3 times in the next few months.
#928
Even if we lose this series to India (I think we'll draw it), Australia would have to win everything and we'd have to get beaten by England 4 zip
Ain't gonna happen
#929
1 Ratings haven't been updated since 5th Nov and SA and England lost and Aus and Pak both won since then.
2 Almost a case of insufficient data - SA have played fewer tests than any of the top 8 in the rankings period.
3 It will happen eventually that someone will displace SA, it's just a question of when.
#930
Nor Springboks winning 2015 RWC.
1 Ratings haven't been updated since 5th Nov and SA and England lost and Aus and Pak both won since then.
2 Almost a case of insufficient data - SA have played fewer tests than any of the top 8 in the rankings period.
3 It will happen eventually that someone will displace SA, it's just a question of when.
1 Ratings haven't been updated since 5th Nov and SA and England lost and Aus and Pak both won since then.
2 Almost a case of insufficient data - SA have played fewer tests than any of the top 8 in the rankings period.
3 It will happen eventually that someone will displace SA, it's just a question of when.
2. So then all teams would need to play exactly the same number of tests for it to be anything meaningful. How many tests should they all play for it to be "sufficient"?
3. Sure it will, just as the ebbs and flows of all sport over time have revealed. But at this point in time they are number 1 in the rankings and have been for a fairly long time. If you don't agree with rankings then take it up with the ICC, as they run them.




Either very good bowling or very poor batting
