Attack the workers and pay the price.
#106
Agree with you about union leaders. And where are they most powerful? The construction industry...
#107
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,830
From: Perth











Low cost credit will of course suck the punters in only to spew them out come interest rate rises which they surely do.
While NG has served vested interests well it is well past its use by date and a tax avoidance scheme this nation can ill afford.
Australian tax being as you well know inefficient, inequitable and hugely unsustainable in present form.
#108
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,830
From: Perth











Anything not accountable and transparent can be open to abuse. Unfair to point the finger at any one sector when corruption is so wide spread.
#109
Account Closed
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0

Pissed off with working for a shite boss/ mental recuperation - same thing. Everybody has done it at some point, those who haven't must be called jack.
#110
A very poor idea that skews the market in favour of speculators at the cost of home makers. As such plays a large part in the housing diabolical situation that we find ourselves in. Take away the tax perks that cost the nation big time and watch the speculation diminish. A highly geared housing sector as Australia is not good for the nation nor longer term for the investor.
Low cost credit will of course suck the punters in only to spew them out come interest rate rises which they surely do.
While NG has served vested interests well it is well past its use by date and a tax avoidance scheme this nation can ill afford.
Australian tax being as you well know inefficient, inequitable and hugely unsustainable in present form.
Low cost credit will of course suck the punters in only to spew them out come interest rate rises which they surely do.
While NG has served vested interests well it is well past its use by date and a tax avoidance scheme this nation can ill afford.
Australian tax being as you well know inefficient, inequitable and hugely unsustainable in present form.
The tax system is inequitable - to higher income earners only as the majority of low income earners pay little income tax
Although NG is not a great idea, removing it will not greatly reduce house prices and it will affect the retirement investments of thousands of ordinary people. $6.8b is a lot of money but pales into insignificance when compared to the amount wasted on unnecessary welfare and other tax bribes
#112
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040











A very poor idea that skews the market in favour of speculators at the cost of home makers. As such plays a large part in the housing diabolical situation that we find ourselves in. Take away the tax perks that cost the nation big time and watch the speculation diminish. A highly geared housing sector as Australia is not good for the nation nor longer term for the investor.
Low cost credit will of course suck the punters in only to spew them out come interest rate rises which they surely do.
While NG has served vested interests well it is well past its use by date and a tax avoidance scheme this nation can ill afford.
Australian tax being as you well know inefficient, inequitable and hugely unsustainable in present form.
Low cost credit will of course suck the punters in only to spew them out come interest rate rises which they surely do.
While NG has served vested interests well it is well past its use by date and a tax avoidance scheme this nation can ill afford.
Australian tax being as you well know inefficient, inequitable and hugely unsustainable in present form.
As Zulu points out the are many retirees tied to NG.
From a set point in time, any purchase should not be eligible for NG. Therefore leaving retirees with pre existing investments safe.





