Aboriginal recognition
#16
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Re: Aboriginal recognition
Was that classification created by the English inhabitants of the day?
#17
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0
Re: Aboriginal recognition
You're missing the point, intentionally I'd say, which is that Aboriginals weren't legally recognized as human beings til 48 years ago. Delving even further back in time so you can apportion blame elsewhere, isn't getting over it and moving on, it's carrying on in the same vein that's got us into a shameful situation in the first place.
#18
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Re: Aboriginal recognition
You're missing the point, intentionally I'd say, which is that Aboriginals weren't legally recognized as human beings til 48 years ago. Delving even further back in time so you can apportion blame elsewhere, isn't getting over it and moving on, it's carrying on in the same vein that's got us into a shameful situation in the first place.
You raised the Frankie Boyle thing. I'm not exactly sure he's really in the right position to pass comment on Australia, and considering he's British, it kind of makes it worse considering the treatment of Aborigines by the British.
#19
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0
Re: Aboriginal recognition
I'm not sure apportioning blame now towards anyone would help at all. What's done is done, those law makers responsible are long dead and buried. Importantly its time to move on, as one nation.
You raised the Frankie Boyle thing. I'm not exactly sure he's really in the right position to pass comment on Australia, and considering he's British, it kind of makes it worse considering the treatment of Aborigines by the British.
You raised the Frankie Boyle thing. I'm not exactly sure he's really in the right position to pass comment on Australia, and considering he's British, it kind of makes it worse considering the treatment of Aborigines by the British.
I agree with you that it's time to move on, however that'll never happen unless Australia takes sole responsibility for the current situation. It's in a mess, go to some towns out west and they're looked at and spoken about like they're no better than animals, which I personally find offencive to the extreme
#20
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Re: Aboriginal recognition
Eh? What bearing do the British, more to the point Frankie Boyle have on the current situation? My reference to him was purely that it was on his show that a piece of information came my way
I agree with you that it's time to move on, however that'll never happen unless Australia takes sole responsibility for the current situation. It's in a mess, go to some towns out west and they're looked at and spoken about like they're no better than animals, which I personally find offencive to the extreme
I agree with you that it's time to move on, however that'll never happen unless Australia takes sole responsibility for the current situation. It's in a mess, go to some towns out west and they're looked at and spoken about like they're no better than animals, which I personally find offencive to the extreme
Apology to Australia's Indigenous peoples | australia.gov.au
If there's some local pockets which offend you, perhaps you should report it.
#21
Re: Aboriginal recognition
Another myth perpetuated by the left and aboriginal asshats with an axe to grind
Do your own research. There is a really good SBS article on this subject
#22
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0
Re: Aboriginal recognition
So prior to 1967 they weren't regulated by the Flora and Fauna act? Not everything is a lefty conspiracy you know, some 'lefties' are just people who give a shit about someone other than themselves.
#23
Re: Aboriginal recognition
Boyle is an asshole. Get your facts from a more reliable source than a prick like that
#24
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0
Re: Aboriginal recognition
An article I read had reference to just that, it just wasn't documented which department looked after indigenous affairs, many states just lumped it on flor and fauna. I'd be inclined to take the whole '**** it you take care of em' sound of that as even more of an insult TBH
Last edited by scrubbedexpat098; Jun 14th 2015 at 6:44 pm.
#25
Re: Aboriginal recognition
what do you mean by 'just' ?
An article I read had reference to just that, it just wasn't documented which department looked after indigenous affairs, many states just lumped it on flor and fauna. I'd be inclined to take the whole '**** it you take care of em' sound of that as even more of an insult TBH
An article I read had reference to just that, it just wasn't documented which department looked after indigenous affairs, many states just lumped it on flor and fauna. I'd be inclined to take the whole '**** it you take care of em' sound of that as even more of an insult TBH
Let's not beat around the bush, what you and Boyle and those who want to make Australia look racist and backwards are trying to make out is that prior to 1967, Australia considered Aboriginals to be animals (fauna) and classified them as such - when they most certainly did not
Australia is no more racist than the UK - that was the case in 1967 and is the case today
#26
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 14,040
Re: Aboriginal recognition
Just was the wrong word to use so let's get that agenda issue out of the way. Apologies for my error
Let's not beat around the bush, what you and Boyle and those who want to make Australia look racist and backwards are trying to make out is that prior to 1967, Australia considered Aboriginals to be animals (fauna) and classified them as such - when they most certainly did not
Australia is no more racist than the UK - that was the case in 1967 and is the case today
Let's not beat around the bush, what you and Boyle and those who want to make Australia look racist and backwards are trying to make out is that prior to 1967, Australia considered Aboriginals to be animals (fauna) and classified them as such - when they most certainly did not
Australia is no more racist than the UK - that was the case in 1967 and is the case today
Kind of akin to the way Brits love shoving countries into a box and boringly banging on about whatever topic they come up with ....... forever. They make light of it as 'just taking the piss' but its pure racism.
#27
Re: Aboriginal recognition
Brits love trying to make Australia look racist. Didn't you know?
Kind of akin to the way Brits love shoving countries into a box and boringly banging on about whatever topic they come up with ....... forever. They make light of it as 'just taking the piss' but its pure racism.
Kind of akin to the way Brits love shoving countries into a box and boringly banging on about whatever topic they come up with ....... forever. They make light of it as 'just taking the piss' but its pure racism.
#28
Re: Aboriginal recognition
It always amuses me when people knock "lefties" and try to construct caring about other people, giving a shit about equality (real equality, not just equality that serves the status quo), and generally being a decent human being as something noxious and with a hidden agenda!
#29
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0
Re: Aboriginal recognition
Just was the wrong word to use so let's get that agenda issue out of the way. Apologies for my error
Let's not beat around the bush, what you and Boyle and those who want to make Australia look racist and backwards are trying to make out is that prior to 1967, Australia considered Aboriginals to be animals (fauna) and classified them as such - when they most certainly did not
Australia is no more racist than the UK - that was the case in 1967 and is the case today
Let's not beat around the bush, what you and Boyle and those who want to make Australia look racist and backwards are trying to make out is that prior to 1967, Australia considered Aboriginals to be animals (fauna) and classified them as such - when they most certainly did not
Australia is no more racist than the UK - that was the case in 1967 and is the case today
Similarly, I think the fact that there is a referendum looming on whether or not the traditional occupants of this country should or shouldn't be recognised in its constitution is absolute proof of its backwardness. It's 2015 for Christs sake, if Australia doesn't want to appear backwards, it's time to stand up and be accountable for its own problems, and stop trying to pay the problem to go away. Just make it happen, equal rights, equal recognition, no special treatment for anyone who doesn't need it.
This is probably all a bit lefty and preachy, but my original issue is the fact that it's going to a vote. They're sussing out the wording of the question, FFS
#30
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 0
Re: Aboriginal recognition
Brits love trying to make Australia look racist. Didn't you know?
Kind of akin to the way Brits love shoving countries into a box and boringly banging on about whatever topic they come up with ....... forever. They make light of it as 'just taking the piss' but its pure racism.
Kind of akin to the way Brits love shoving countries into a box and boringly banging on about whatever topic they come up with ....... forever. They make light of it as 'just taking the piss' but its pure racism.
I don't give a monkeys where Britain stands in the racism table, my home is Australia, I'm a citizen and I have a voice.