Voting?
#31
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 691











The Libs are prepared to make tough, challenging decsions and stick by their principles for the good of the country. Practically every reform that has been needed to make Australia's ecomony strong (and it is now one of the strongests in the world) have been opposed by Rudd and his lot (though Rudd claims he is an "economic conservative"- what a joke!)
#32
BE Enthusiast





Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 691











So based on this analysis you will vote for a party that will march a country off to an unjust war at the drop of a hat (and the next one...) because they are led by Bush's Bitch? And turn the screw on employees with more to follow?
Look, I'm not pretending that Rudd won't say anything to get in and that a Labo(u)r goverment won't have it's flaws (let's be realistic and look at Blair...) ... but more Howard with a Costello chaser?
Not for my money ... which isn't apparently valid currency yet
Look, I'm not pretending that Rudd won't say anything to get in and that a Labo(u)r goverment won't have it's flaws (let's be realistic and look at Blair...) ... but more Howard with a Costello chaser?
Not for my money ... which isn't apparently valid currency yet

I don't think Howard has ever lied (I can hear the scoffs now) It was just that what he believed to be true turned out to be wrong (huge difference between lying and being mistaken, but a lot of people find it politically convenient not to appreciate the difference)
#33
You would honestly prefer a man who picks his own ear wax in parliament and eats it, speaks using constant slogans and sounds bites, complains about things but never explains just how the ALP will fix them in cold, hard terms and is apparently quite nasty and a control freak behind the scenes.
The Libs are prepared to make tough, challenging decsions and stick by their principles for the good of the country. Practically every reform that has been needed to make Australia's ecomony strong (and it is now one of the strongests in the world) have been opposed by Rudd and his lot (though Rudd claims he is an "economic conservative"- what a joke!)
The Libs are prepared to make tough, challenging decsions and stick by their principles for the good of the country. Practically every reform that has been needed to make Australia's ecomony strong (and it is now one of the strongests in the world) have been opposed by Rudd and his lot (though Rudd claims he is an "economic conservative"- what a joke!)
#34
Rudd has already lied (anyone remeber the ALP snake Brian Burke?)
I don't think Howard has ever lied (I can hear the scoffs now) It was just that what he believed to be true turned out to be wrong (huge difference between lying and being mistaken, but a lot of people find it politically convenient not to appreciate the difference)
I don't think Howard has ever lied (I can hear the scoffs now) It was just that what he believed to be true turned out to be wrong (huge difference between lying and being mistaken, but a lot of people find it politically convenient not to appreciate the difference)
He's a politician FFS! It is in the job description to be able to lie cleverly so that it appears to be the truth or a "mistake" or blame a staffer.
Last edited by The Bloke; Nov 23rd 2007 at 4:30 pm.
#35
As for when Keating was Treasurer, as stated before, the whole world was in recession.
Last edited by The Bloke; Nov 23rd 2007 at 4:51 pm.
#36





Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 721

Your memory isn't that hot either. You've forgotten the total mess that the Fraser government inherited from Whitlam. They had to get the country back from the verge of bankruptcy. Hawke/Keating inherited an economy that the Libs had started to turn around. And don't forget the recession we had to have or Keating saying that we would become a banana republic.
Let me quote "The Bloke" for a response to that one.
He just puts it so well....
The large debt historically was a legacy of the Menzies to McMahon Liberal. the Whitlam gov't inherited the debt along with an unpopular war (Vietnam). They were NOT allowed to implement policy as the Senate was then controlled by the Liberals, which blocked the passage of (monetary) Supply Bills on more than one occasion. They then tried to raise funds from an Arab go-between (Kemlani) to cover the shortfall created by the blocking of the Supply Bill. It was then the the GG dismissed the gov't on the instigation of Malcolm Fraser.
As for when Keating was Treasurer, as stated before, the whole world was in recession.
As for when Keating was Treasurer, as stated before, the whole world was in recession.
I guess we could keep going back all the way to Federation and find pros and cons for each side. That's the point really. It's all cyclical.
#37










Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,133

Rudd has already lied (anyone remeber the ALP snake Brian Burke?)
I don't think Howard has ever lied (I can hear the scoffs now) It was just that what he believed to be true turned out to be wrong (huge difference between lying and being mistaken, but a lot of people find it politically convenient not to appreciate the difference)
I don't think Howard has ever lied (I can hear the scoffs now) It was just that what he believed to be true turned out to be wrong (huge difference between lying and being mistaken, but a lot of people find it politically convenient not to appreciate the difference)
However, I do remember troops going off to a war that has been condemned by the majority of the rest of the world for reasons that were totally fictitious.
I'd bet that most people would see that ordering people into the line of fire for reasons that you don't totally understand because you are Bush's Bitch is worse than lying anyway and a decent reason for saying 'Thanks, but see ya!'.
#39





Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 721

The Bennelong exit poll just discussed on the 7 special.
That's a 1 in 100 sample, pretty decent sample for statistical accuracy.
7% swing against John Howard !!
That's a 1 in 100 sample, pretty decent sample for statistical accuracy.
7% swing against John Howard !!
#40
Home and Happy










Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 94,305
From: Keep true friends and puppets close, trust no-one else...











Sod the Aussie politics, I think NZ is far more exciting.
Full hedgehog suffrage
After a goat successfully received nomination in a local body election on Waiheke Island, the McGillicuddy Serious Party unsuccessfully attempted to stand a hedgehog for Parliament, apparently solely in order to make "prick" jokes.
Taken from -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McGillicuddy_Serious_Party
Full hedgehog suffrage
After a goat successfully received nomination in a local body election on Waiheke Island, the McGillicuddy Serious Party unsuccessfully attempted to stand a hedgehog for Parliament, apparently solely in order to make "prick" jokes.
Taken from -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McGillicuddy_Serious_Party
#41
Thread Starter
Account Closed




Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 383

So, John Howard is out, not only as PM but also as MP. How does the Australian political-system work? Does Rudd become PM straight away or is there some transition-period?
#42
Technically the Liberal Party is still in control, in a caretaker role, until the new Ministers and Parliament is sworn in by the GG. They cannot, however, make any decisions or implement any policy, so in effect the whole Australian Public Service is now in limbo until then. Half of the Senate does not change until next July, so in effect they are in control of that too until then, when the new makeup of Senators becomes apparent.




