![]() |
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
Originally Posted by DeadVim
(Post 8425774)
That's what Alex Ferguson will look like in the future ...
|
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
Originally Posted by Amazulu
(Post 8425780)
What do you mean 'in the future'? :D
|
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
Originally Posted by DeadVim
(Post 8425776)
Don't tell me, you are one of the suckers that spent over $15 for a HDMI cable? :D
|
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
OLEDs in large panels have "been coming" for several years - no sign yet though!
|
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
Originally Posted by Deancm
(Post 8426039)
Definitely not. Expensive HDMI cable is a con. Expensive cable for the analogue HI FI, different kettle of fish.
|
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
i dont think that there is agreat deal of difference between plasma and LCD now; SONY only do LCD and they're one of the biggest out there.
i think the most importnant thing is to get a set that allows you to manually adjust all the things that influence picture quality - RGB, gamma etc etc - so that you can set it up for the exact conditions in your room. shops will set up a particular brand over another eg sony over panny if they are a sony dealer, so that the sony looks better and they achieve more sales. OLED is the way forward i am led to believe but at present that tech is still quite pricey. |
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
Originally Posted by DeadVim
(Post 8426141)
Indeed ... I went into Dick(head) Smiths and enquired as to why their cheapest HDMI cable was $55 ... "That's How Much They Cost, It's New Technology" was the cutting insight offered ... I bought mine off the 'net for $14 ...
What a load of crap. It's a digital signal! It's either on or off. |
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
Originally Posted by Rod-Helen-Poppy
(Post 8426157)
OLED is the way forward i am led to believe but at present that tech is still quite pricey.
Laser TV was apparently going to be the next big thing as well... |
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
Originally Posted by DeadVim
(Post 8426141)
Indeed ... I went into Dick(head) Smiths and enquired as to why their cheapest HDMI cable was $55 ... "That's How Much They Cost, It's New Technology" was the cutting insight offered ... I bought mine off the 'net for $14 ...
http://www.comet.co.uk/shopcomet/pro...-2M-HDMI-CABLE 1.5m HDMI from CableUniverse £1.75 http://www.cableuniverse.co.uk/catal...cat=230&page=1 |
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
Originally Posted by Alfresco
(Post 8426362)
2m HDMI cable from Comet £69.99 (Monster Cable)
http://www.comet.co.uk/shopcomet/pro...-2M-HDMI-CABLE 1.5m HDMI from CableUniverse £1.75 http://www.cableuniverse.co.uk/catal...cat=230&page=1 |
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
Originally Posted by freebo
(Post 8426383)
I also think really expensive analouge cables are a waste of money, but thats a whole new argument;)
|
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
Originally Posted by Deancm
(Post 8426404)
I have to disagree with that but you would need a really good Hi Fi and speakers to notice the difference.
|
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
Originally Posted by freebo
(Post 8426446)
I thought someone would ;) I've seen threads hundreds of pages long with folk arguing both sides of that very subject so lets not go there :D
|
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
Originally Posted by Deancm
(Post 8426348)
The guys at Dick Smiths, Harvey Norman etc haven't got a clue what they are talking about. They try the old "you'll get less signal degradation with the more expensive ones and in turn get a better picture".
What a load of crap. It's a digital signal! It's either on or off. |
Re: LCD Vs Plasma
Originally Posted by Wol
(Post 8426463)
Grain of truth - the better the error correction circuitry the fewer the picture interpolations, no?
There's a good article about this on the AVForums: http://www.avforums.com/forums/inter...h-fiction.html |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:34 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.