Wikiposts

Carbon tax

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 9:22 pm
  #346  
Bix's Avatar
Bix
da Bonehead
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 22,767
From: Lion in da jungle
Bix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Budawang
In the long run, when the world has moved much further towards reducing carbon emissions, Australian industry will have a competitive advantage.
Just one problem.
There may be no Australian industry worth talking about left by then.
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 9:25 pm
  #347  
Budawang's Avatar
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 899
From: Canberra
Budawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Amazulu
What should happen is an election
I disagree. Gillard formed a legitimate government. Governments make decisions that change people's lives. That's what governments do. Let them get on with it and if you don't like the results then turf them out at the next election. It's called democracy.
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 9:29 pm
  #348  
Budawang's Avatar
BE Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 899
From: Canberra
Budawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond reputeBudawang has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Bix
Just one problem.
There may be no Australian industry worth talking about left by then.
Bix, with all due respect you've been listening to Tony, the shock jocks and the Murdoch media circus too much.
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 9:31 pm
  #349  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,555
IvanM is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Carbon tax

Similar hysteria greeted the GST.
Originally Posted by Bix
Just one problem.
There may be no Australian industry worth talking about left by then.
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 9:48 pm
  #350  
Bix's Avatar
Bix
da Bonehead
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 22,767
From: Lion in da jungle
Bix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond reputeBix has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Budawang
Bix, with all due respect you've been listening to Tony, the shock jocks and the Murdoch media circus too much.
Not listening as much as watching...........watching all the businesses in Cairns close their doors caused by the snowball affect of a high dollar but the carbon tax is going to exacerbate that situation.

I may be a bit of a rarity in that I hold no allegiance to any political party, preferring to judge each policy on it's merits, but in this case that is what is sorely missing. I have seen no credible evidence to suggest there is an issue and even if there was this action does nothing to address it. It purely taxes Australia.

If the global community was serious it would assist the USA and China to do something and get a far better return for it's money.

You don't solve many problems by nibbling at the small fry. You hit the big stuff where the returns are high for less input.
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 9:52 pm
  #351  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 269
billingham is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Broad Shoulders
http://www.news.com.au/money/money-m...-1226096932869

Well it certainly looks like the start of my prediction is becoming real

Just so I know, at what point can I say "I told you so"?

Couldn't believe my luck that this came out only one day after you posted that
Ironically it came off the back of one of your gospel-ladden polls


I'm off to the TAB
What on earth are you talking about?

Correct me if I am wrong, but the poll suggests that most of the population do not understand the carbon tax? Yes? So, 2 conclusions can be drawn from that:

1: The Australian public is stupid

2: Labour are crap at explaining.

Which is it?

Furthermore, you stated (which was the point of your diatribe):

"Besides, you watch, the in favour rate will bounce back once there is more education about it"

That poll simply shows that people know nothing about it, not that they will agree with it once they do know! Extrapolating lucid information is a skill, but massaging information to suit your argument is simply the preserve of con artists.

Apart from the fact that your views are now somewhat discredited because of your vested interests, could you please stay on topic and answer some / all of the valid counter arguments? That would make this forum a little less like being in the playground.
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 10:01 pm
  #352  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,237
From: Perth
HelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Broad Shoulders
...and? I'm not the one who has a problem with conflicts of interest here? You're the one who brought up the Gillard conflict, I simply pointed out that if you want to play that game the other side of politics is equally conflicted. Everyone will have some biaise one way or another, it will affect different people in different ways. I look at this tax purely from a personal stand point and how this will affect my household. On a professional note, I actually don't think this carbon tax will have that much of an impact on my business. The Labor plans are commercially orientated and I doubt much of that $10billion will go to solar. Once you start looking at renewable energy power stations solar PV is not cost efficient and that is where wind farms and solar thermal plants take over.

So in reality there is not much of a conflict there. Keep on mud slinging though. You are clearly determined to argue the man and not the plan!
How am I mud-slinging and no one else here is, including you? How am I attacking the man - it's the whole shebang of disastrous policies this mangled-together government has come up with. I would hope that people are looking at this from a personal household viewpoint as well as how it will affect the country. It just doesn't make sense for individuals or the country as a whole as well as internationally.
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 10:08 pm
  #353  
NedKelly's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,584
NedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Budawang
If you take the science of anthropogenic climate change seriously, introducing a carbon tax or an ETS is a "no brainer".
You should have said "If you take the science of anthropogenic climate change seriously, you obviously have no brain".
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 10:11 pm
  #354  
NedKelly's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,584
NedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Budawang
That's right, public servants are all soulless slaves to their political masters. They shouldn't even be able to vote.
The only ones who shouldn't be able to vote are the ones who pay no tax or get a net tax credit.
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 10:11 pm
  #355  
Broad Shoulders's Avatar
I'm Old Gregg!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,460
From: A Former Bogan Colony in QLD
Broad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by billingham
What on earth are you talking about?

Correct me if I am wrong, but the poll suggests that most of the population do not understand the carbon tax? Yes? So, 2 conclusions can be drawn from that:

1: The Australian public is stupid

2: Labour are crap at explaining.

Which is it?

Furthermore, you stated (which was the point of your diatribe):

"Besides, you watch, the in favour rate will bounce back once there is more education about it"

That poll simply shows that people know nothing about it, not that they will agree with it once they do know! Extrapolating lucid information is a skill, but massaging information to suit your argument is simply the preserve of con artists.

Apart from the fact that your views are now somewhat discredited because of your vested interests, could you please stay on topic and answer some / all of the valid counter arguments? That would make this forum a little less like being in the playground.
or 3) Labor has still only had 1 week since announcing the details to educate.
The coalition has had 3 months of fear mongering
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 10:14 pm
  #356  
Broad Shoulders's Avatar
I'm Old Gregg!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,460
From: A Former Bogan Colony in QLD
Broad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by billingham
Furthermore, you stated (which was the point of your diatribe):

"Besides, you watch, the in favour rate will bounce back once there is more education about it"

That poll simply shows that people know nothing about it, not that they will agree with it once they do know! Extrapolating lucid information is a skill, but massaging information to suit your argument is simply the preserve of con artists.
Why do you fail to read my full posts?

I said "Well it certainly looks like the start of my prediction is becoming real"

The theory being, once educated, the Australian public will begin to swing back. You really are quite something, please read fully my posts before responding to them.
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 10:17 pm
  #357  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,555
IvanM is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Carbon tax

So in Ned world low income workers and carers get no vote?

Originally Posted by NedKelly
The only ones who shouldn't be able to vote are the ones who pay no tax or get a net tax credit.
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 10:18 pm
  #358  
Broad Shoulders's Avatar
I'm Old Gregg!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,460
From: A Former Bogan Colony in QLD
Broad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond reputeBroad Shoulders has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by HelenTD
How am I mud-slinging and no one else here is, including you? How am I attacking the man - it's the whole shebang of disastrous policies this mangled-together government has come up with. I would hope that people are looking at this from a personal household viewpoint as well as how it will affect the country. It just doesn't make sense for individuals or the country as a whole as well as internationally.
The fact that you cannot see how you are not attacking the man just illustrates the problem here. You keep wanting to point out how everyone who opposes your point of view has a conflict of interest, insinuating that their opinion and thoughts are void. That is attacking the man.

This thread is about the Carbon Tax, not me, not Julia Gillard, Rupert Murdoch, Tony Abbott. The fact that you refuse to debate the tax just tells me that you have not bothered at all to familiarise yourself with it, instead believing the propaganda being plastered around by the fear mongerers.
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 10:19 pm
  #359  
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,237
From: Perth
HelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond reputeHelenTD has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by Budawang
Helen, I think you've missed the point regarding the Carbon Tax. The idea is not to encourage the rich domestic consumers to use less electricity - as you point out, they are not likely to be very responsive to a modest increase in the cost of fossil fuel derived electricity. It is designed to encourage a change in the behaviour of electricity producers and the heavy industrial consumers like the steel and aluminium industries. A small increase in the cost of producing or consuming electricity has a big increase on their bottom line. If they can substitute some of their production or consumption with non fossil fuel sources (i.e. carbon neutral "renewable" energy), then that will reduce costs and will give them a competitive advantage. These large corporations are highly price sensitive and the carbon tax will result in a significant incentive to become more efficient and innovate. In the long run, when the world has moved much further towards reducing carbon emissions, Australian industry will have a competitive advantage.
You're using concepts that don't normally go together, such as Australian industry, reduce costs, competitive advantage, more efficient and innovate. Australian industry is insignificant compared to other countries. Australian industry and residents can reduce their impact on the environment. I have always found this country quite wasteful of its resources. I don't see how the carbon tax will change that. If your argument is correct that it's all about industry reducing its use of fossil-fuels, why aren't all Australian households being compensated? Why is the coal industry still going? Why is Queensland rushing into coal seam gas?
 
Old Jul 17th 2011 | 10:25 pm
  #360  
NedKelly's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,584
NedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond reputeNedKelly has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Carbon tax

Originally Posted by IvanM
So in Ned world low income workers and carers get no vote?
Works for me.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.