![]() |
Re: Cane Toads
Originally Posted by jayr
(Post 7057701)
Lots of people will happily aim to run over cane toads in their car, especially when there are lot on the road following rains.
The RSPCA suggest putting haemmorhoid cream on their backs then freezing, or better still taking to a vet to euthanise. I suspect that if we leave it to RSPCA methods the cane toad invasion will continue apace and kill off more indigineous wildlife in QLD, the NT and increasingly in NSW I think they're trying to genetically engineer a virus of some description to make the toads sterile . . . although I may be getting confused with Jurassic Park . . . so don't quote me on it! |
Re: Cane Toads
I believe the cream anaesthetises them, then put them in frdige at 4C for half an hour then into the freezer. They will sow down and their body temp drops and they die humanely apparently.
Problem with this method, I suspect, is few people are prepared to do it. You also need to be wearing gloves and eye protection and of course have to handle the toad directly. Most people I know seem to ahve a preference for running them over, using dettol or salt. WHile these may be inhumane, the willingness of people to use these methods is presumably a more effective control on numbers than by freezing them.
Originally Posted by spartacus
(Post 7057729)
I'm intrigued by the inclusion of haemmorhoid cream. For what purpose?
I think they're trying to genetically engineer a virus of some description to make the toads sterile . . . although I may be getting confused with Jurassic Park . . . so don't quote me on it! |
Re: Cane Toads
Originally Posted by jayr
(Post 7057747)
I believe the cream anaesthetises them, then put them in frdige at 4C for half an hour then into the freezer. They will sow down and their body temp drops and they die humanely apparently.
Problem with this method, I suspect, is few people are prepared to do it. You also need to be wearing gloves and eye protection and of course have to handle the toad directly. Most people I know seem to ahve a preference for running them over, using dettol or salt. WHile these may be inhumane, the willingness of people to use these methods is presumably a more effective control on numbers than by freezing them. |
Re: Cane Toads
http://web.cornell.edu/studentblogs/...g-legs-jpg.jpe
And please spare a thought for all those disabled frogs that mankind has created :cry_smile::cry_smile: |
Re: Cane Toads
It's a joke. There are so many introduced animals in Australia. Even dingos aren't 'native' but they've been here so long that Australia thinks they're the native dog. Cows and sheep aren't native. Blackbirds aren't native. Pigs aren't native... toads, Goats, pigs rabbits etc are only here cos PEOPLE brought them here! It does NOT give people the right to torture them, and what well balanced person would want to anyway??:curse: |
Re: Cane Toads
Originally Posted by jayr
(Post 7057701)
Lots of people will happily aim to run over cane toads in their car, especially when there are lot on the road following rains.
The RSPCA suggest putting haemmorhoid cream on their backs then freezing, or better still taking to a vet to euthanise. I suspect that if we leave it to RSPCA methods the cane toad invasion will continue apace and kill off more indigineous wildlife in QLD, the NT and increasingly in NSW |
Re: Cane Toads
I cannot possibly imagine how a slow agonizing freezing death can be more merciful than a quick bat around the head which will kill instantly.
Obviously some people cannot stand blood and gore and prefer to think they are more civilized by freezing an animal rather than being violent towards it, but surely it is what quickly kills the animal with the least amount of suffering that counts. I think a bat, brick or any heavy object that will instantly smash the brain would be best. |
Re: Cane Toads
I think the RSPCA's only objection is whether or not a single blow kills. If you aim accuratley and use sufficent force to kill instantly, or ensure you aim centrally with the wheels of your car, then I see no objection to killing toads in this maner, aside from it being a little messy.
Those who beleive in the rights of all animals to live should be more concerned with the devastation that cane toads have on indigineous wildlife. It may seem ironic, but those willing to kill a cane toad quickly are doing more for animal welfare and the sustainability of the Austrlaian environment.
Originally Posted by krunchynutt
(Post 7059328)
I cannot possibly imagine how a slow agonizing freezing death can be more merciful than a quick bat around the head which will kill instantly.
Obviously some people cannot stand blood and gore and prefer to think they are more civilized by freezing an animal rather than being violent towards it, but surely it is what quickly kills the animal with the least amount of suffering that counts. I think a bat, brick or any heavy object that will instantly smash the brain would be best. |
Re: Cane Toads
Originally Posted by jayr
(Post 7059512)
I think the RSPCA's only objection is whether or not a single blow kills. If you aim accuratley and use sufficent force to kill instantly, or ensure you aim centrally with the wheels of your car, then I see no objection to killing toads in this maner, aside from it being a little messy.
Those who beleive in the rights of all animals to live should be more concerned with the devastation that cane toads have on indigineous wildlife. It may seem ironic, but those willing to kill a cane toad quickly are doing more for animal welfare and the sustainability of the Austrlaian environment. |
Re: Cane Toads
Originally Posted by jayr
(Post 7059512)
Those who beleive in the rights of all animals to live should be more concerned with the devastation that cane toads have on indigineous wildlife. It may seem ironic, but those willing to kill a cane toad quickly are doing more for animal welfare and the sustainability of the Austrlaian environment.
|
Re: Cane Toads
Originally Posted by ray2gill
(Post 7059572)
Are you talking about the indigineous wildlife that people happily talk about going out and shooting i.e. Kangeroos?
|
Re: Cane Toads
Originally Posted by krunchynutt
(Post 7059599)
I don't think there is a shortage of Kangaroos, if there shot for food then why not, Kangaroo meat is very tasty and healthy.
G |
Re: Cane Toads
Those who beleive in the rights of all animals to live should be more concerned with the devastation that cane toads have on indigineous wildlife. It may seem ironic, but those willing to kill a cane toad quickly are doing more for animal welfare and the sustainability of the Austrlaian environment. agree with you, but there are far too many animal rights activists and doo gooders who are too blind to see the bigger picture. Jackie do-gooder |
Re: Cane Toads
Originally Posted by krunchynutt
(Post 7059328)
I cannot possibly imagine how a slow agonizing freezing death can be more merciful than a quick bat around the head which will kill instantly.
Obviously some people cannot stand blood and gore and prefer to think they are more civilized by freezing an animal rather than being violent towards it, but surely it is what quickly kills the animal with the least amount of suffering that counts. I think a bat, brick or any heavy object that will instantly smash the brain would be best. Cane Toads and actually, quite a few other amphibious creatures have a natural mechanism that causes them to go into a state of hibernation quite naturally when they are cold. Obviously you don't know about that. Here's an interesting study for you to read: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0826115906.htm What may seem slow and agonising for you is not for a toad. They naturally go to sleep when they're cold. This is why some toads and frogs in certain countries can burrow themselves and go to sleep for a winter, or a drought, and wake up months later when the rains or heat arrives back. I don't have any objection to blood and gore... but one smash doesn't do it for many cane toads, which results in a long, slow, agonising, bashing death. |
Re: Cane Toads
Originally Posted by jayr
(Post 7059512)
Those who beleive in the rights of all animals to live should be more concerned with the devastation that cane toads have on indigineous wildlife. It may seem ironic, but those willing to kill a cane toad quickly are doing more for animal welfare and the sustainability of the Austrlaian environment. How have you reached that conclusion exactly? And your second point, how will collecting 100 toads a night and putting them to death through kinder methods do less than someone willing to bash 100 toads over the head? Can you tell me exactly what advantage to animal welfare this has? I'm struggling to see your point so perhaps you can enlighten us all. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:56 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.