"1 in a 100 year slump"
#61
Re: "1 in a 100 year slump"
What's so bad about house prices going down by 30% anyway? They'll still be 30% up on 2001 prices. For most owner-occupiers it won't make any difference. For people who invested heavily in investment properties it won't look good on paper but rents have been going up a lot so that will cushion the blow. The RBA's aggressive interest rate policy means interest rates will most likely be significantly lower in 2010. For young first home buyers it will be sweet.
I honestly don't care much if my house value drops 30%. Might be a good time for buying that beach house I've been dreaming about.
I honestly don't care much if my house value drops 30%. Might be a good time for buying that beach house I've been dreaming about.
#62
Re: "1 in a 100 year slump"
Vash
16% increase in a year is worse then ridiculous - it's dangerous. To put it in perspective, house prices have crashed about 8% or 10% (I'm reading conflicting reports) in the last year, and the whole country is wetting its pants.
If it went down as fast as it went up, say, 16%, there would be a major crash. Stupid rises like this are of course a major contributor to housing crashes.
16% increase in a year is worse then ridiculous - it's dangerous. To put it in perspective, house prices have crashed about 8% or 10% (I'm reading conflicting reports) in the last year, and the whole country is wetting its pants.
If it went down as fast as it went up, say, 16%, there would be a major crash. Stupid rises like this are of course a major contributor to housing crashes.
#65
Re: "1 in a 100 year slump"
I agree. Or you could ask Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch and the IMF as they all say the same thing. I recall "armchair experts"predicting a 10% drop this time last year and they were roundly mocked.
Now 10% has come off. House prices are toast, and this is because of pretty simple economic factors that nearly everyone can understand, except those in denial or the greedy.
Now 10% has come off. House prices are toast, and this is because of pretty simple economic factors that nearly everyone can understand, except those in denial or the greedy.
#66
Account Open
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,298
Re: "1 in a 100 year slump"
I agree. Or you could ask Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch and the IMF as they all say the same thing. I recall "armchair experts"predicting a 10% drop this time last year and they were roundly mocked.
Now 10% has come off. House prices are toast, and this is because of pretty simple economic factors that nearly everyone can understand, except those in denial or the greedy.
Now 10% has come off. House prices are toast, and this is because of pretty simple economic factors that nearly everyone can understand, except those in denial or the greedy.
#67
Re: "1 in a 100 year slump"
What's so bad about house prices going down by 30% anyway? They'll still be 30% up on 2001 prices. For most owner-occupiers it won't make any difference. For people who invested heavily in investment properties it won't look good on paper but rents have been going up a lot so that will cushion the blow. The RBA's aggressive interest rate policy means interest rates will most likely be significantly lower in 2010. For young first home buyers it will be sweet.
I honestly don't care much if my house value drops 30%. Might be a good time for buying that beach house I've been dreaming about.
I honestly don't care much if my house value drops 30%. Might be a good time for buying that beach house I've been dreaming about.
but.....our outstanding home loan balance today is now 100k less than it was 3 years ago, so even with a 30% drop today our value to debt ratio would still be at 1.3:1
In actual fact, for our value to debt ratio to drop right down to 1:1 (where our house value matched our outstanding loan balance), we would need to see a 57% drop in our current house price.
I can live with the odds of that happening !!
A no brainer for us....even with that enormous correction in pricing happening, our mortgage is getting smaller by the month and in hindsight it was the best decision we ever made.
In the meantime we watch rental prices go up, and up and up.....
If, on the other hand, we had bought our house here in Melbourne just 12 months ago, at the price it was valued at then, we would be very nervous right now of facing possible negative equity if there was such a massive price correction, but thankfully that is not the case.
This would be the exact same situation for someone in the UK I would think ?
Last edited by DownUnderPaddy; Aug 6th 2008 at 5:20 pm.
#68
Re: "1 in a 100 year slump"
But 10% hasn't come off. And for every 'expert' which says everything's going to drop by 30%, there's another who says things will remain stable and then slowly grow - so who knows?! Certainly not me and, dare I say it, certainly not you either.
Either way it doesn't really bother me - houses are a long term investment and will always go up and down in value.
Cheers,
Graham
Either way it doesn't really bother me - houses are a long term investment and will always go up and down in value.
Cheers,
Graham
#69
Re: "1 in a 100 year slump"
But 10% hasn't come off. And for every 'expert' which says everything's going to drop by 30%, there's another who says things will remain stable and then slowly grow - so who knows?! Certainly not me and, dare I say it, certainly not you either.
Either way it doesn't really bother me - houses are a long term investment and will always go up and down in value.
Cheers,
Graham
Either way it doesn't really bother me - houses are a long term investment and will always go up and down in value.
Cheers,
Graham
#70
Re: "1 in a 100 year slump"
Well it's already come off Californian house prices and property there was over-valued to a similar percentage as Australian stock. People waiting there didn't need luck and neither will people waiting in Australia. Several leading financial institutions have forecast a major drop of between 25% - 30% off these prices, but I guess you know better.
I'll enjoy catching up with you in 2010 to talk about who was right.
I'll enjoy catching up with you in 2010 to talk about who was right.
#71
Re: "1 in a 100 year slump"
But 10% hasn't come off. And for every 'expert' which says everything's going to drop by 30%, there's another who says things will remain stable and then slowly grow - so who knows?! Certainly not me and, dare I say it, certainly not you either.
Either way it doesn't really bother me - houses are a long term investment and will always go up and down in value.
Cheers,
Graham
Either way it doesn't really bother me - houses are a long term investment and will always go up and down in value.
Cheers,
Graham
Its arse just might be saved by falling oil prices, but this is unlikely for two reasons: 1) the oil increase only played one part out of several in the house market slide, and 2) the credit crunch has already instilled extreme caution in buyers. Frankly, you would have to be an absolute moron to borrow seven times your salary to buy a house in this uncertain market. And because only a small percentage of the population are absolute morons, the majority of people are now simply sitting with their money in the bank and waiting for prices to come down.
This in itself will cause a crash, or in other words fear of a crash causes a crash.
I mkust say it is fascinating actually living now and taking all this denial in because I have often wondered how people got caught out in the crashes of the 1830s, or 1870s, or 1890s, or 1930s, or 1970s, or 1990s, but now I can see how - they think it simply cannot happen "here" and cannot happen "now".
The arrogance of people to presume house prices can never drop again in all history is an amazing spectacle. Just look at the above decades - do people seriously think the 1990s was the last time houses will ever crash? They are currently more over-valued in real terms than the 1820s, 1860s, 1880s, 1920s, 1960s , and 1980s.
You do the maths.
I add in edit Graham that my post is not specifically aimed at you - your post just gave me reason to think about all this generally, so I'm really referring to anyone running round saying "it can never happen here" to anyone who will listen, when I suspect what they are thinking is "I don't want it to happen to now and I might be able to convince myself it will not happen if I say it out loud enough" etc.
Last edited by Tableland; Aug 7th 2008 at 9:15 am.
#73
Re: "1 in a 100 year slump"
Have you seen a graph of average house prices? It is so far above trend a correction is inevitable. Pretty soon they're going to have make A4 paper bigger to fit it in. Too much money being lent to too many people at too low an interest rate for too long.
Last edited by Tableland; Aug 7th 2008 at 9:17 am.
#74
Re: "1 in a 100 year slump"
I agree broadly that nothing is certain in this market, and despite what my posts might look like, I am skeptical of "financial insitutions". My strong feeling that the market is coming down is based more on a reading of market history and the general attitude of buyers right now plus the fact they cannot get the (ridiculous) amount of money out of banks any more to "buy" the properties.
Have you seen a graph of average house prices? It is so far above trend a correction is inevitable. Pretty soon they're going to have make A4 paper bigger to fit it in. Too much money being lent to too many people at too low an interest rate for too long.
Have you seen a graph of average house prices? It is so far above trend a correction is inevitable. Pretty soon they're going to have make A4 paper bigger to fit it in. Too much money being lent to too many people at too low an interest rate for too long.
The very nature of modern capitalism, the desire to make more and more money, will ensure this happens.
#75
Re: "1 in a 100 year slump"
Not so sure... I thought after the debacle of the early 90's that it could never happen again but here we are, and it's just as bad as far as the irresponsible lending goes... people have some short memories...