Would you have come to America ...
#91
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,834
Re: Would you have come to America ...
How interesting. I know very little about modern astronomy, let alone its history. But do you really think people living BCE had any real notion of what they were looking at in the sky, and that they too were standing on a planetary body? It's difficult to imagine, given their unawareness of things like it being spherical, orbiting the sun, etc*. I mean, look what a surprise it was when America turned out to be on the either side of the ball (both to the Europeans and the Native Americans).
*youre going to tell me now that the Egyptians or Mayans or some such nailed this a millennium before Copernicus, aren't you 😄
*youre going to tell me now that the Egyptians or Mayans or some such nailed this a millennium before Copernicus, aren't you 😄
#92
Re: Would you have come to America ...
How interesting. I know very little about modern astronomy, let alone its history. But do you really think people living BCE had any real notion of what they were looking at in the sky, and that they too were standing on a planetary body? It's difficult to imagine, given their unawareness of things like it being spherical, orbiting the sun, etc*. I mean, look what a surprise it was when America turned out to be on the either side of the ball (both to the Europeans and the Native Americans).
*youre going to tell me now that the Egyptians or Mayans or some such nailed this a millennium before Copernicus, aren't you.
*youre going to tell me now that the Egyptians or Mayans or some such nailed this a millennium before Copernicus, aren't you.
The revelation of Copernicus was that the earth orbits the sun, prior to that it was believed that everything orbited Earth, although Aristarchus of Samos had suggested a heliocentric model in the third century BC (only about 900 years before Copernicus ), but it didn't catch on at the time. Of course it is hard to be sure what exactly prehistoric man understood about the stars and planets, but the alignment of Stonehenge and other standing stones tells us that they were very much aware of the movements of the sun and undoubtedly other celestial bodies, and I find it hard to believe that people who clearly spent so much time and effort to track the moon and the sun had not worked out that we are standing on a sphere and observing celestial bodies spinning around us.
From the Wikipedia article on the history of astronomy:
.... The Ancient Greeks developed astronomy, which they treated as a branch of mathematics, to a highly sophisticated level. The first geometrical, three-dimensional models to explain the apparent motion of the planets were developed in the 4th century BC by Eudoxus of Cnidus and Callippus of Cyzicus. Their models were based on nested homocentric spheres centered upon the Earth. Their younger contemporaryHeraclides Ponticus proposed that the Earth rotates around its axis.
A different approach to celestial phenomena was taken by natural philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. They were less concerned with developing mathematical predictive models than with developing an explanation of the reasons for the motions of the Cosmos. In his Timaeus, Plato described the universe as a spherical body divided into circles carrying the planets and governed according to harmonic intervals by a world soul.[23] Aristotle, drawing on the mathematical model of Eudoxus, proposed that the universe was made of a complex system of concentric spheres, whose circular motions combined to carry the planets around the earth.[24] This basic cosmological model prevailed, in various forms, until the 16th century AD.
In the 3rd century BC Aristarchus of Samos was the first to suggest a heliocentricsystem, although only fragmentary descriptions of his idea survive.[25] Eratosthenes, using the angles of shadows created at widely separated regions, estimated the circumference of the Earth with great accuracy. ......
A different approach to celestial phenomena was taken by natural philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. They were less concerned with developing mathematical predictive models than with developing an explanation of the reasons for the motions of the Cosmos. In his Timaeus, Plato described the universe as a spherical body divided into circles carrying the planets and governed according to harmonic intervals by a world soul.[23] Aristotle, drawing on the mathematical model of Eudoxus, proposed that the universe was made of a complex system of concentric spheres, whose circular motions combined to carry the planets around the earth.[24] This basic cosmological model prevailed, in various forms, until the 16th century AD.
In the 3rd century BC Aristarchus of Samos was the first to suggest a heliocentricsystem, although only fragmentary descriptions of his idea survive.[25] Eratosthenes, using the angles of shadows created at widely separated regions, estimated the circumference of the Earth with great accuracy. ......
Last edited by Pulaski; Jul 18th 2015 at 11:15 am.
#93
Banned
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 55
Re: Would you have come to America ...
have i landed on the planet of knobs
#94
Re: Would you have come to America ...
How interesting. I know very little about modern astronomy, let alone its history. But do you really think people living BCE had any real notion of what they were looking at in the sky, and that they too were standing on a planetary body? It's difficult to imagine, given their unawareness of things like it being spherical, orbiting the sun, etc*. I mean, look what a surprise it was when America turned out to be on the either side of the ball (both to the Europeans and the Native Americans).
*youre going to tell me now that the Egyptians or Mayans or some such nailed this a millennium before Copernicus, aren't you 😄
*youre going to tell me now that the Egyptians or Mayans or some such nailed this a millennium before Copernicus, aren't you 😄
#95
I have a comma problem
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
Re: Would you have come to America ...
Depending on how you land, that could prove to be quite uncomfortable.
The idea of a heliocentric system goes back almost as far as well. They knew their shit back then. I suppose when there's bugger all else to do at night (unless your wife was feeling cooperative), one spends their time looking up.
The idea of a heliocentric system goes back almost as far as well. They knew their shit back then. I suppose when there's bugger all else to do at night (unless your wife was feeling cooperative), one spends their time looking up.
#97
I have a comma problem
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
#100
I have a comma problem
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
#101
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 19,367
Re: Would you have come to America ...
Well, I generally try to provide tangible evidence to support my views, which is sometimes contrary to what people want to believe and therefore, unacceptable.
And to make it worse, many objectors therefore have difficulty finding supporting evidence of what they want to believe (or simply can't be bothered), so it lends to the perception that I somehow think I'm always right, simply because it's not what they want to hear, and they can't prove otherwise..
However, it would be helpful if pedantics, strawman arguments and the final "you're a moronic tosser troll bitch" weren't considered to be credible final proof that they're right and I'm wrong. But you know what they say about opinions, so no worries, I don't take it personally.
have a nice day.
And to make it worse, many objectors therefore have difficulty finding supporting evidence of what they want to believe (or simply can't be bothered), so it lends to the perception that I somehow think I'm always right, simply because it's not what they want to hear, and they can't prove otherwise..
However, it would be helpful if pedantics, strawman arguments and the final "you're a moronic tosser troll bitch" weren't considered to be credible final proof that they're right and I'm wrong. But you know what they say about opinions, so no worries, I don't take it personally.
have a nice day.
Last edited by amideislas; Jul 20th 2015 at 5:45 pm.
#102
Heading for Poppyland
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: North Norfolk and northern New York State
Posts: 14,544
Re: Would you have come to America ...
Well, I generally try to provide tangible evidence to support my views, which is sometimes contrary to what people want to believe and therefore, unacceptable.
And to make it worse, many objectors therefore have difficulty finding supporting evidence of what they want to believe (or simply can't be bothered), so it lends to the perception that I somehow think I'm always right, simply because it's not what they want to hear, and they can't prove otherwise..
However, it would be helpful if pedantics, strawman arguments and the final "you're a moronic tosser troll bitch" weren't considered to be credible final proof that they're right and I'm wrong. But you know what they say about opinions, so no worries, I don't take it personally.
have a nice day.
And to make it worse, many objectors therefore have difficulty finding supporting evidence of what they want to believe (or simply can't be bothered), so it lends to the perception that I somehow think I'm always right, simply because it's not what they want to hear, and they can't prove otherwise..
However, it would be helpful if pedantics, strawman arguments and the final "you're a moronic tosser troll bitch" weren't considered to be credible final proof that they're right and I'm wrong. But you know what they say about opinions, so no worries, I don't take it personally.
have a nice day.
#103
Banned
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 19,367
Re: Would you have come to America ...
Still, although various research on the topic varies, it seems that there's an overwhelming amount of 'crock' to go around:
The 10 Most Common Languages
2. Spanish
Its prominence in the Americas as well as in Europe makes Spanish one of the most common languages, with 405 million speakers. The Castilian dialect in Spain is held as a national standard, although Andalusian and Catalan are also spoken.
Its prominence in the Americas as well as in Europe makes Spanish one of the most common languages, with 405 million speakers. The Castilian dialect in Spain is held as a national standard, although Andalusian and Catalan are also spoken.
Chinese* (937,132,000)
Spanish (332,000,000)
English (322,000,000)
Bengali (189,000,000)
Hindi/Urdu (182,000,000)
Arabic* (174,950,000)
Portuguese (170,000,000)
Russian (170,000,000)
Japanese (125,000,000)
German (98,000,000)
French* (79,572,000)
Spanish (332,000,000)
English (322,000,000)
Bengali (189,000,000)
Hindi/Urdu (182,000,000)
Arabic* (174,950,000)
Portuguese (170,000,000)
Russian (170,000,000)
Japanese (125,000,000)
German (98,000,000)
French* (79,572,000)
The Top 10 Most Natively Spoken Languages
#2 – Spanish is probably in 2nd place 2nd language with the most native speakers, but it is in very close running with English. The most recent figures are between 329-400 million native speakers in 21 countries, and one of few languages to be spoken natively in both the western and eastern hemispheres.
The most widely spoken languages
Most widely spoken language by number of native speakers
conversation1Mandarin (1197 million)
Spanish (406 million)
English (335 million)
Hindi-Urdu (260 million)
Arabic (223 million)
Portuguese (202 million)
Bengali (193 million)
Russian (162 million)
Japanese (122 million)
Javanese (84.3 million)
Chinese (Mandarin): no less than 1,365,000,000 people!
Spanish: between 325 and 500 million speakers – it is known as Castilian. It is a Romance language that evolved from several languages and dialects in the north central region of the Iberian peninsula during the ninth century. It is spoken in 21 countries.
English: Between 309 and 400 million people speak it natively, and between 500 million and 1.8 billion people speak it as a second language.
Arabic: between 206 and 422 million speakers
Hindi: 181 million speakers
Portuguese: 178 million speakers
Bengali: 173 million speakers
Russian: 164 million speakers
Japanese: 128 million speakers
10. German: 96 million speakers
2. Spanish (329 million speakers)
Spanish is a member of the West Iberian branch of the Romance languages, closely related to Portuguese. Spanish is one of the most widely distributed languages in the world; it is the official language of over 20 countries, and is the official language of nearly every state in Latin America, excepting Brazil, Belize, etc. Additionally, large populations of native speakers have immigrated to the United States, and Spanish is now one of the most common languages in the American southwest. It is also one of the six official languages of the United Nations.
Spanish is a member of the West Iberian branch of the Romance languages, closely related to Portuguese. Spanish is one of the most widely distributed languages in the world; it is the official language of over 20 countries, and is the official language of nearly every state in Latin America, excepting Brazil, Belize, etc. Additionally, large populations of native speakers have immigrated to the United States, and Spanish is now one of the most common languages in the American southwest. It is also one of the six official languages of the United Nations.
Can you name the 50 most spoken languages (by native speakers) in the world?
There's a lot more, but I don't want to piss you off.
Still, I reckon all that crock qualifies me as a "moronic tosser troll bitch" then?
Last edited by amideislas; Jul 20th 2015 at 7:57 pm.
#104
I have a comma problem
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
Re: Would you have come to America ...
Did somebody turn over two pages at once ...
#105
Re: Would you have come to America ...
Well, there you go - exemplifying my point - Wasn't what you wanted to believe? Well that makes it a 'crock' dunnit?
Still, although various research on the topic varies, it seems that there's an overwhelming amount of 'crock' to go around:
The 10 Most Common Languages
The World's Most Widely Spoken Languages
Except all of those quir
The Top 10 Most Natively Spoken Languages
The most widely spoken languages
The 10 most widely spoken languages on Earth…surprise!
Top 10 most spoken languages
And there's even a LITTLE quiz for you:
Can you name the 50 most spoken languages (by native speakers) in the world?
There's a lot more, but I don't want to piss you off.
Still, I reckon all that crock qualifies me as a "moronic tosser troll bitch" then?
Still, although various research on the topic varies, it seems that there's an overwhelming amount of 'crock' to go around:
The 10 Most Common Languages
The World's Most Widely Spoken Languages
Except all of those quir
The Top 10 Most Natively Spoken Languages
The most widely spoken languages
The 10 most widely spoken languages on Earth…surprise!
Top 10 most spoken languages
And there's even a LITTLE quiz for you:
Can you name the 50 most spoken languages (by native speakers) in the world?
There's a lot more, but I don't want to piss you off.
Still, I reckon all that crock qualifies me as a "moronic tosser troll bitch" then?
In short, I am not at all persuded by someone merely publishing a list of languages and numbers of speakers without some explanation of where the numbers come from. Specifically I would like to know what statistics were used to allow for non-Engish speaking minorities in the US, UK, Canada, and Australia, and other countries, and whether any attempt was made to include English speakers in former British colonies notably in Africa?
Someone else (Robin?) also pointed out that at least some of the published figures for Spanish speakers appear to assume 100% of the population speaks Spanish in "Spanish speaking countries".