Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA
Reload this Page >

Working in the States

Working in the States

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 16th 2010, 4:12 pm
  #46  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Working in the States

Originally Posted by meauxna
Sorry, I've tried to keep them on track. It's like that here sometimes.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance...-than-the-nhs/

My evidence.
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Dec 17th 2010, 11:57 am
  #47  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
fish.01's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,039
fish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Working in the States

Originally Posted by E3only
I just want to, once and for all, try and bust this myth (well partially bust it anyway).

Australia has both public and private health insurance covers. Public / govt health insurance has a cost and only covers you for non elective procedures. Yes, for common illnesses you are covered. HOWEVER. It has a cost.

For a couple with no kids earning 150k, you will be forced to pay 1.5% i.e. 1500 a year. 150K is considered rich by Australian govt so you will have to pay another 1% as surcharge i.e total 2.5% = $315 a month. This will ONLY cover you for common illnesses and none of the major surgeries.
What do you mean it will not cover you for major surgeries? Public health system covers you for every surgery...cancer, heart attack, everything?

Sure, minor elective surgery has a waiting list, but the big city hospital wait times are often fine. Here's my local hospital's waiting times for example: http://www.myhospitals.gov.au/hospit...omens-hospital

Originally Posted by E3only
The way to avoid the surcharge would be to have “private health insurance”. Lot of people end up taking the pvt health insurance so they don’t have to pay 1% surcharge and also get better coverage.

Now, the pvt health insurance totally depends on what type of cover you wanted. For a basic hospital cover my wife and I were paying around $225 a month. NOTE, this is after tax dollars so to convert that to before tax dollars and add it to the 1.5% cost of public health insurance we get to roughly $500 a month. Remember this is before you even add kids to the plan. I compare that with what I am paying now ($300 a month) and I consider US to be financially ahead of the medical insurance in US.
Yes, this surcharge you pay when you earn over $150,000 was added by the conservatives (republicans) to push more people into private insurance.

Comparing premiums and taxation is a bit pointless given they are based on totally different taxation systems. We are all paying in so many different ways. For example as someone pointed out the US government pays far more taxpayer dollars on medicine than do countries like the UK and Australia and still has no universal healthcare.

Originally Posted by E3only
And don’t even get me started on Australian pvt health insurance waiting times. For instance, if my fall were to fall pregnant and didn’t have pregnancy cover for alteast 12 months before falling pregnant, she will not be covered for pvt health insurance.
I think you have misinterpreted this. The 12 months is before the date of the birth not getting pregnant. So the actual wait is 3 months. And if you fell pregnant less than 3 months after getting your insurance you could just go through the public system which provides great pregnancy care. If fact many prefer it.


And your private insurance premium is not tied to your job. So the $250 family cover would continue to be $250 if you lost your job. There is no cut off. People are not scared of losing health entitlements when losing their job. They are unrelated.

And if money gets tight you can drop your private insurance and still often get top notch treatment in the public system. Poor people are fully covered like everyone else.

I think Australia is lucky to have a mix of the British and USA systems - universal cover with a strong private system as well. It of course has issues like all health systems do. The US system of course would have some strengths that the Australian one doesn't. They all have good and bad.

I think one statistic is a pretty good indicator of a health system. The Life Expectancy of people born today in your country. Australia doesn't do so bad at 5th in the world so I would say our health system must be getting lots more right than it gets wrong: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ife_expectancy

Last edited by fish.01; Dec 17th 2010 at 12:17 pm.
fish.01 is offline  
Old Dec 17th 2010, 12:15 pm
  #48  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
fish.01's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,039
fish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond reputefish.01 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Working in the States

Originally Posted by E3only
[I]...
Don’t even get me started on that. Let’s just say I am a Liberal and I believe in – who uses, should pay. Labor came in power and reduced the limit to 144k. Tell you what 144K after tax with 2 kids and a mortgage in Sydney is average money. But that’s a whole another discussion. And yes, that how Socialistic society works – not “our” society. Talking about fairness – well I agree non income earners deserve access to medicare as much as anyone else.

...
You have this the wrong way around. Labor came to power and increased the limit so less people had to pay it. It used to be far lower under the conservatives (LNP) so far more had to pay it.
fish.01 is offline  
Old Dec 17th 2010, 3:20 pm
  #49  
 
meauxna's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 35,082
meauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond reputemeauxna has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Working in the States

This is not the place for a discussion about Australian health care.

OP, if you have a more specific question, please start a new thread.
meauxna is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.