Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.
#16
Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.
as for myself, didn't have the choice, but it is a pretty good hmo.
#17
Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.
Yeah, but for my organization it seemed like difference was negligible considering the costs associated with each plan, co-pays, yada yada yada. It seemed like a no brainer. I can see where you are coming from though.
#18
Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.
They should not be stopped all together. Some of them have merit especially in malpractice.
I'm afraid economic theory doesn't apply here. There is actually a shortage of health care workers.
If anything the main factor that raises the cost of health care is the ability for medical facilities to charge exorbitant rates because health insurance companies charge US exorbitant rates. We need to deal with insurance companies.
Not immigration law regarding physicians.
That does ring true. We need to have transparency between health care lobbies and politicians. Those relationships need to be addressed first and foremost.
#19
Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.
If you stop the negligence suits, you need some other method of weeding out grossly incompetent doctors. The US has no real history of policing itself in any other way than by using the courts -- you cull by suing the b*st*rds to death. Other countries have managed to develop professional organizations that can self-police, or independent ombudsmen who can use their real power to achieve the same effect. That skill has not reached our shores, yet.
Also, it should be noted that negligence payouts becomes smaller in countries where there is already universal health care since damages do not need to include these further health care costs in their calculations.
Also, it should be noted that negligence payouts becomes smaller in countries where there is already universal health care since damages do not need to include these further health care costs in their calculations.
#20
Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.
Let's face it, without a profit necessity, they only need to run at half the efficiency of the private sector to cost the same. They managed to put a man on the moon let's not forget. They can do big stuff when they want to.
Personally, I'd like a "socialized Med program" here in the US. If by such a system you were describing the NHS, it would cost us about half the amount and deliver a similar if not better service overall. But I assume as you used the word "socialized" you are not in favour.
#21
Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.
If you stop the negligence suits, you need some other method of weeding out grossly incompetent doctors. The US has no real history of policing itself in any other way than by using the courts -- you cull by suing the b*st*rds to death. Other countries have managed to develop professional organizations that can self-police, or independent ombudsmen who can use their real power to achieve the same effect. That skill has not reached our shores, yet.
and if your not sick and you take a risk cause you want a bigger d*ck or breasts i do not feel very sorry for you . same as i dont feel sorry for people that take part in very dangerus hobbies like bungee jumping etc etc if the possable bad outcome bothers your that much maybe your shouldnt do it.
there are professional organizations doctors belong too also there is a self policeing method if doctors kill people they wont have customers for very long .
Also, it should be noted that negligence payouts becomes smaller in countries where there is already universal health care since damages do not need to include these further health care costs in their calculations.
The fact that the US government is incapable of running things is not an argument that they shouldn't but rather an argument that they should be forced by the electorate to provide efficiency through accountability
Since there are some things that only government can run (Do you really want Walmart issuing driving licenses or to visit Marriott Yellowstone Park?), push for this rather than your defeatist attitude.
Marriot Yellowstone there is one of those already . i am not defeatist i dont trust the goverment with my health care . With Rights come responbiltys if the goverment is in charge of my health then that gives them reason to tell me what to eat Drink Smoke etc etc ... it would be like moving back in with my mom and dad . if you dont pay your way the one in charge of doing that for u will .
and responibillty is something i forgot to talk about earlyer if anything health care is more in the US cause we have let areselves get fat and out of shape . I would bet the European system would suffer the same strain givin the same kind of population we have in the US right now
Personally, I'd like a "socialized Med program" here in the US. If by such a system you were describing the NHS, it would cost us about half the amount and deliver a similar if not better service overall. But I assume as you used the word "socialized" you are not in favour.
#22
Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.
and if your not sick and you take a risk cause you want a bigger d*ck or breasts i do not feel very sorry for you . same as i dont feel sorry for people that take part in very dangerus hobbies like bungee jumping etc etc if the possable bad outcome bothers your that much maybe your shouldnt do it.
We all pay it here. About twice as much as the NHS, for example.
if the goverment contracted the DMVs out to walmart that would be one of the best things to happen to this nation ? If i could get the same good helpful and nice treatment i get from wallmart employees but from the ones at the DMV i would asked to be pinched . http://uloc.nerdtank.org/quiz/quiz03.jpg
Marriot Yellowstone there is one of those already . i am not defeatist i dont trust the goverment with my health care . With Rights come responbiltys if the goverment is in charge of my health then that gives them reason to tell me what to eat Drink Smoke etc etc ... it would be like moving back in with my mom and dad . if you dont pay your way the one in charge of doing that for u will .
and responibillty is something i forgot to talk about earlyer if anything health care is more in the US cause we have let areselves get fat and out of shape . I would bet the European system would suffer the same strain givin the same kind of population we have in the US right now
Makes no sense. Please expand.
#24
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.
Yes, and over here they don't work -- hence the excessive use of the courts to cull them. It's actually pretty difficult to find information about how good or how bad a doctor is over here. If you know where to discover this information, please let us know. In the absence of such information, each doctor has about 300 million people to get through (or maybe 250 if he refuses to treat those without insurance) before there's nobody left.
#30
And YOU'RE paying for it!
Joined: May 2007
Location: kipper tie?
Posts: 2,328
Re: Universal Health Ins? The Candidates.
I don't know why there is such fear of "socialized" medicine. We (US) pay way more and get way less per dollar than practically anyone else.
What's the VA's spend per covered individual? And is it that much worse than private insurance or (even more so) than being uninsured? I suppose they don't do a lot of obgyn, ER work etc.
Well said, you commie!
What's the VA's spend per covered individual? And is it that much worse than private insurance or (even more so) than being uninsured? I suppose they don't do a lot of obgyn, ER work etc.
I got a bit of unemployment last year (out of work 6 weeks after 23 years of continuous employment, I deserved it ), I get roads to drive on, I get a great state university system, I get a local govt. that issues tax credits for hybrids, that offers medi-cal to poor people, that recognizes domestic partnerships in addition to marriage, etc. I'd rather pay 6.6% to live in compasionate, liberal CA than sweat it out in some right-wing redneck state that has no tax.