Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA
Reload this Page >

United States v. Windsor

United States v. Windsor

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 28th 2013, 11:59 pm
  #46  
-------------------------
 
paranoidandroid's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,382
paranoidandroid has a reputation beyond reputeparanoidandroid has a reputation beyond reputeparanoidandroid has a reputation beyond reputeparanoidandroid has a reputation beyond reputeparanoidandroid has a reputation beyond reputeparanoidandroid has a reputation beyond reputeparanoidandroid has a reputation beyond reputeparanoidandroid has a reputation beyond reputeparanoidandroid has a reputation beyond reputeparanoidandroid has a reputation beyond reputeparanoidandroid has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: United States v. Windsor

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
Or even better - allow common law couples (irrespective of sexual orientation) the same benefits and render marriage itself unnecessary.
You're going straight to hell when you die. I hope you realise that.
paranoidandroid is offline  
Old Jun 29th 2013, 2:20 am
  #47  
 
Nutek's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: CT
Posts: 33,505
Nutek has a reputation beyond reputeNutek has a reputation beyond reputeNutek has a reputation beyond reputeNutek has a reputation beyond reputeNutek has a reputation beyond reputeNutek has a reputation beyond reputeNutek has a reputation beyond reputeNutek has a reputation beyond reputeNutek has a reputation beyond reputeNutek has a reputation beyond reputeNutek has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: United States v. Windsor

Nutek is offline  
Old Jun 29th 2013, 9:34 pm
  #48  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
sir_eccles's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,106
sir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: United States v. Windsor

Apparently they are wasting no time approving petitions. From another thread

http://miamiherald.typepad.com/gayso...ex-couple.html
sir_eccles is offline  
Old Jul 1st 2013, 2:26 pm
  #49  
BE Forum Addict
 
kins's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,043
kins has a reputation beyond reputekins has a reputation beyond reputekins has a reputation beyond reputekins has a reputation beyond reputekins has a reputation beyond reputekins has a reputation beyond reputekins has a reputation beyond reputekins has a reputation beyond reputekins has a reputation beyond reputekins has a reputation beyond reputekins has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: United States v. Windsor

Originally Posted by sir_eccles
Apparently they are wasting no time approving petitions. From another thread

http://miamiherald.typepad.com/gayso...ex-couple.html
I just saw this too -
kins is offline  
Old Jul 1st 2013, 3:53 pm
  #50  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,154
hungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: United States v. Windsor

Originally Posted by kins
I just saw this too -
I won't say 'I told you so..'
hungryhorace is offline  
Old Jul 1st 2013, 6:49 pm
  #51  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
sir_eccles's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,106
sir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: United States v. Windsor

Originally Posted by kins
I just saw this too -
Reading some more details this morning

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/01/us...card.html?_r=0

Things to note:

- the USCIS has been keeping a list of couples who filed a petition and are working through that list officially starting this week but someone pressed the button too soon, no need to re-file

- the couple in the story live in FL a state that does not recognize their marriage in NY (and FL has a constitutional ban) but that does not seem to have mattered

- I am guessing that a lot of these early cases will be like the couple featured, adjusting status from being a student for 15 years, it might be a while until CR1 and K1 petitions make it through the system
sir_eccles is offline  
Old Jul 18th 2013, 9:26 pm
  #52  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
sir_eccles's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,106
sir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: United States v. Windsor

Interesting opinion piece suggesting DHS is overstepping the bounds of the decision in reviewing same sex petitions:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/18/op..._20130718&_r=0
sir_eccles is offline  
Old Aug 29th 2013, 8:36 pm
  #53  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
sir_eccles's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,106
sir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: United States v. Windsor

IRS to recognize all gay marriages regardless of state!

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/30/us...-of-state.html
sir_eccles is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.