Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
#31
Forum Regular
Joined: Apr 2016
Location: California
Posts: 233
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
In my wildest pipe-dreams - it's never even crossed my mind that either the State or Federal govt. would shell out to repair destruction to one's home due to earthquake damage.
At best - yes, hopefully dig you out from beneath the rubble , get you to Cedars (or whatever hospital is closest) if required and if it's still standing but other than that....would think all available emergency and monetary resources will go toward rescue operations, extinguishing fires caused by exploding gas mains etc. and then in prioritised order - massive cleanup operations, infrastructure repair/reconstruction (roads/freeways, bridges, ports, power etc.)
but....I don't like to think about this - so am crawling back into my state of denial and not comforting myself with any fantasies about what governmental deus ex machina might mean in a post-apocalypse reality.
Housing Repair and Reconstruction After Loma Prieta
At best - yes, hopefully dig you out from beneath the rubble , get you to Cedars (or whatever hospital is closest) if required and if it's still standing but other than that....would think all available emergency and monetary resources will go toward rescue operations, extinguishing fires caused by exploding gas mains etc. and then in prioritised order - massive cleanup operations, infrastructure repair/reconstruction (roads/freeways, bridges, ports, power etc.)
but....I don't like to think about this - so am crawling back into my state of denial and not comforting myself with any fantasies about what governmental deus ex machina might mean in a post-apocalypse reality.
Housing Repair and Reconstruction After Loma Prieta
#33
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
Reading the useful link that you provided I see that there was quite some assistance- two-thirds of over a billion dollars of assistance to owner-occupiers. Makes me a bit more comfortable not having earthquake insurance with my house right on top of a fault. But like you I don't like to think about it.
course you could also say: "over $666,666,666.667"!
Whatever - but glad it provides some re-assurance
#34
Forum Regular
Joined: Apr 2016
Location: California
Posts: 233
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
Yes I didn't put it very well. I was thinking of this piece from under Table 3 in the article
"out of an estimated $1,130,000 spent on earthquake recovery 66% ($750 million) was spent on assistance for owner occupiers".
(they've missed 3 zeros)
#35
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
The thing is if you've ever been thru a "big one" (and maybe you have ) it's harder to take comfort in number$ eg a Panglossian panacea.
I just want to survive it
#36
Just Joined
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
As an owner of several rental properties I'd say that if you can keep your London property and still buy here in CA then do it. Perhaps you can refinance the London property and get enough for the downpayment here. Since mortgage rates are so low and you can deduct interest payments then it's worth having a large mortgage and keep getting rental income, since I assume you are getting a good return on that London property.
I love rental properties and the income that they generate.
I love rental properties and the income that they generate.
#37
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2013
Location: California
Posts: 88
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
We bought here but kept the UK property till we understand tax implications. We did wait for green cards but saw prices go up in that time. I would be tempted to find a better rental and wait for green cards. The London market will go up more than LA I reckon. Maybe your tenant will still want to buy a year from now? I have heard the London market is cooling. Maintenance costs much less here. New asphalt roof 10$ k. New hvac system $5500. UK flat always has crazy high bills on it.
#38
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
You are the first person I think I have ever seen say that. IME, and everyone else's I have ever seen post on the topic, maintenance costs in the US easily outstrip maintenance costs in the UK - and to your two examples, a roof in the US often only lasts around 20 years, and an HVAC (heating/AC) as little as ten years.
#39
Return of bouncing girl!
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: The Fourth Reich
Posts: 4,931
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
Reading the useful link that you provided I see that there was quite some assistance- two-thirds of over a billion dollars of assistance to owner-occupiers. Makes me a bit more comfortable not having earthquake insurance with my house right on top of a fault. But like you I don't like to think about it.
We don't have earthquake insurance as the cost is simply prohibitive - I console myself with the thought that a large part of the value of our home is in the land, which of course we'd still own: the actual rebuild cost (according to AAA) is less than half what we paid for the house.
There's always GoFundMe
#40
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2013
Location: California
Posts: 88
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
Well I can only speak of our personal experience Pulaski. We own a Victorian flat that is tiny in the UK and every year we have to fork out for something-now it is a 39K$ bill on putting steel into the front of the house to support the wall- that is just our share so you can multiply that by 5 for the cost the company is billing us all- 125 K sterling plus extra costs due to it being a listed building. The lease will be another 20 K to get back up to 100 years when we come to sell.
In the US we have a mid century home- 60 years old. The hvac system we have was put in in 87 so we expect it to go pretty soon. 5500 to put a new unit and furnace in. The roof is coming up to 30 years- asphalt...so we have to replace this soon but no leaks yet. We know these dates as I called the city before we bought and they send a folder with every date of every license that was issued.
So it may be we find standards have dropped and we will now only find hvac units that last 10 years and the same for roofs.....but going on the evidence available so far.....cost on our 400 square foot uk property vastly outstrip what we spend here. We spent 120$ on maintenance last year-due to having a home warranty so I guess we will continue to have that.
Maybe you live somewhere with adverse weather? You are obviously having a different experience of costs to us.
I agree having a home incurs costs but so far the costs of the UK property are way higher.
I just checked travel costs in the UK to get a train up North and was astounded having not visited in a while. I really do not know how people survive in the south east of the UK with an average income. We find living costs lower here for most things and we are in an expensive city.
In the US we have a mid century home- 60 years old. The hvac system we have was put in in 87 so we expect it to go pretty soon. 5500 to put a new unit and furnace in. The roof is coming up to 30 years- asphalt...so we have to replace this soon but no leaks yet. We know these dates as I called the city before we bought and they send a folder with every date of every license that was issued.
So it may be we find standards have dropped and we will now only find hvac units that last 10 years and the same for roofs.....but going on the evidence available so far.....cost on our 400 square foot uk property vastly outstrip what we spend here. We spent 120$ on maintenance last year-due to having a home warranty so I guess we will continue to have that.
Maybe you live somewhere with adverse weather? You are obviously having a different experience of costs to us.
I agree having a home incurs costs but so far the costs of the UK property are way higher.
I just checked travel costs in the UK to get a train up North and was astounded having not visited in a while. I really do not know how people survive in the south east of the UK with an average income. We find living costs lower here for most things and we are in an expensive city.
#41
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
Well I can only speak of our personal experience Pulaski. We own a Victorian flat that is tiny in the UK and every year we have to fork out for something-now it is a 39K$ bill on putting steel into the front of the house to support the wall- that is just our share so you can multiply that by 5 for the cost the company is billing us all- 125 K sterling plus extra costs due to it being a listed building. The lease will be another 20 K to get back up to 100 years when we come to sell.
In the US we have a mid century home- 60 years old. The hvac system we have was put in in 87 so we expect it to go pretty soon. 5500 to put a new unit and furnace in. The roof is coming up to 30 years- asphalt...so we have to replace this soon but no leaks yet. We know these dates as I called the city before we bought and they send a folder with every date of every license that was issued.
So it may be we find standards have dropped and we will now only find hvac units that last 10 years and the same for roofs.....but going on the evidence available so far.....cost on our 400 square foot uk property vastly outstrip what we spend here. We spent 120$ on maintenance last year-due to having a home warranty so I guess we will continue to have that.
Maybe you live somewhere with adverse weather? You are obviously having a different experience of costs to us.
I agree having a home incurs costs but so far the costs of the UK property are way higher.
I just checked travel costs in the UK to get a train up North and was astounded having not visited in a while. I really do not know how people survive in the south east of the UK with an average income. We find living costs lower here for most things and we are in an expensive city.
In the US we have a mid century home- 60 years old. The hvac system we have was put in in 87 so we expect it to go pretty soon. 5500 to put a new unit and furnace in. The roof is coming up to 30 years- asphalt...so we have to replace this soon but no leaks yet. We know these dates as I called the city before we bought and they send a folder with every date of every license that was issued.
So it may be we find standards have dropped and we will now only find hvac units that last 10 years and the same for roofs.....but going on the evidence available so far.....cost on our 400 square foot uk property vastly outstrip what we spend here. We spent 120$ on maintenance last year-due to having a home warranty so I guess we will continue to have that.
Maybe you live somewhere with adverse weather? You are obviously having a different experience of costs to us.
I agree having a home incurs costs but so far the costs of the UK property are way higher.
I just checked travel costs in the UK to get a train up North and was astounded having not visited in a while. I really do not know how people survive in the south east of the UK with an average income. We find living costs lower here for most things and we are in an expensive city.
I am citing a blend of my personal experience, that of friends and colleagues, and reported by others on BE.
My ten year old heating and AC system was "condemned" three years ago, but with a few relatively modest repairs it is doing quite nicely at the moment, and I know enough to push back on contractors trying to sell me something - others likely don't have my knowledge or experience to push back as effectively
Your experience in the US is far from typical, and in fairness your UK benchmark home is also atypical for the UK. Consider yourself lucky(US)/unlucky(UK). Generally speaking someone from the UK cannot expect to have the same experience as you.
Last edited by Pulaski; Apr 21st 2016 at 5:47 pm.
#42
Forum Regular
Joined: Jul 2013
Location: California
Posts: 88
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
That could be one way to look at it Pulaski- we have to see ourselves ultimately as lucky it has gone up 400 % in value since we bought it, which we realise is modest compared to London gains, but we accept a small chunk of any profit will now be spent on these expensive repairs.
I think Victorian homes are not uncommon in the UK so these bills will not be so unusual. Ten years for a hvac system is terrible- were you unlucky to buy a home where someone had put in a cheap system?))
Surely roofs in climates with little rain last longer than an average UK roof, which not being asphalt will be more costly to replace? We have not owned a UK house, only a flat, so we cannot compare on that front, but when we come to replace our hvac we will do plenty of research to get a good one that lasts longer than 10 years. The owner who lived here before us engineered for NASA so maybe he brought some bits and bobs back from work and adapted our hvac system making it last three times longer than the ones you speak of.)) That would indeed be lucky for us.
I think Victorian homes are not uncommon in the UK so these bills will not be so unusual. Ten years for a hvac system is terrible- were you unlucky to buy a home where someone had put in a cheap system?))
Surely roofs in climates with little rain last longer than an average UK roof, which not being asphalt will be more costly to replace? We have not owned a UK house, only a flat, so we cannot compare on that front, but when we come to replace our hvac we will do plenty of research to get a good one that lasts longer than 10 years. The owner who lived here before us engineered for NASA so maybe he brought some bits and bobs back from work and adapted our hvac system making it last three times longer than the ones you speak of.)) That would indeed be lucky for us.
#43
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
That could be one way to look at it Pulaski- we have to see ourselves ultimately as lucky it has gone up 400 % in value since we bought it, which we realise is modest compared to London gains, but we accept a small chunk of any profit will now be spent on these expensive repairs.
I think Victorian homes are not uncommon in the UK so these bills will not be so unusual. Ten years for a hvac system is terrible- were you unlucky to buy a home where someone had put in a cheap system?))
Surely roofs in climates with little rain last longer than an average UK roof, which not being asphalt will be more costly to replace? We have not owned a UK house, only a flat, so we cannot compare on that front, .....
I think Victorian homes are not uncommon in the UK so these bills will not be so unusual. Ten years for a hvac system is terrible- were you unlucky to buy a home where someone had put in a cheap system?))
Surely roofs in climates with little rain last longer than an average UK roof, which not being asphalt will be more costly to replace? We have not owned a UK house, only a flat, so we cannot compare on that front, .....
Here in the US roofs often get damaged (maybe they're badly installed or with cheap materials?), and get replaced after less than the usual 20 or so years. A neighbouring house to us was built 26 years ago and the owner knows the roof is now on borrowed time. Over say 50 years of adulthood and home ownership in the US, you can reasonably expect to have two or three roofs to buy, OR see a depressed value of your home at sale because the roof is "old" or "damaged".
My parents had new central heating installed in the late 1970's. It still runs just fine, with an annual service, more than 40 years later, and I am sure has many more years life in it yet. Over the same period in the US a heating/AC system would likely have had to be replaced, twice! Remember, the systems are completely different technology, with a US heating/AC system having more in common with a fridge than with a British heating system.
And yes, my heating system is cheap and has been badly maintained.
Last edited by Pulaski; Apr 21st 2016 at 6:23 pm.
#44
Forum Regular
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 211
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
Tile roofs are very good. Luckily I have one on my primary here in CA. I'm always amazed when I see those wood shake jobbies that appear to be disintegrating.
#45
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Aug 2013
Location: Athens GA
Posts: 2,134
Re: Selling in London to buy in LA....?!
That could be one way to look at it Pulaski- we have to see ourselves ultimately as lucky it has gone up 400 % in value since we bought it, which we realise is modest compared to London gains, but we accept a small chunk of any profit will now be spent on these expensive repairs.
I think Victorian homes are not uncommon in the UK so these bills will not be so unusual. Ten years for a hvac system is terrible- were you unlucky to buy a home where someone had put in a cheap system?))
Surely roofs in climates with little rain last longer than an average UK roof, which not being asphalt will be more costly to replace? We have not owned a UK house, only a flat, so we cannot compare on that front, but when we come to replace our hvac we will do plenty of research to get a good one that lasts longer than 10 years. The owner who lived here before us engineered for NASA so maybe he brought some bits and bobs back from work and adapted our hvac system making it last three times longer than the ones you speak of.)) That would indeed be lucky for us.
I think Victorian homes are not uncommon in the UK so these bills will not be so unusual. Ten years for a hvac system is terrible- were you unlucky to buy a home where someone had put in a cheap system?))
Surely roofs in climates with little rain last longer than an average UK roof, which not being asphalt will be more costly to replace? We have not owned a UK house, only a flat, so we cannot compare on that front, but when we come to replace our hvac we will do plenty of research to get a good one that lasts longer than 10 years. The owner who lived here before us engineered for NASA so maybe he brought some bits and bobs back from work and adapted our hvac system making it last three times longer than the ones you speak of.)) That would indeed be lucky for us.
Guidance here in the south is for hvac to last 10 - 15 years.