Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA
Reload this Page >

Moving on from an E2

Moving on from an E2

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 23rd 2008, 2:42 am
  #1  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 12
dip your toe is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Moving on from an E2

If your original E2 investment has grown to a value that would qualify, after CGT, for an EB5, can you apply for an EB5 whilst maintaining an E2 status and sell the business back to yourself by setting up a new coporation to purchase the original E2 business?
dip your toe is offline  
Old Feb 23rd 2008, 5:40 am
  #2  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,266
Folinskyinla is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Moving on from an E2

Originally Posted by dip your toe
If your original E2 investment has grown to a value that would qualify, after CGT, for an EB5, can you apply for an EB5 whilst maintaining an E2 status and sell the business back to yourself by setting up a new coporation to purchase the original E2 business?
Hi:

Maybe yes, maybe no. This is presuming that the investment was in a NEW business which created 10 jobs.

I have a gut feeling that the "straw" transaction you are talking about would make a difference -- and in fact might hurt because of the "new" requirement.

I'm a lawyer but I'm not YOUR lawyer. And I now avoid EB-5's like the plague.

I've mentioned this elsewhere that I was once involved in a case where the E-2 investments was in an ongoing business and did not create a single new job. However, the investment then started losing money hand over fist -- so as to become a "distressed business." There is a quirk in the regulations that look at the amount invested at the time made but the determination of stress is as of the time the petition is filed. The DAO and I had a chuckle on how stupid the regulation was.

Please note that CIS has a strange habit these days of ignoring the law as part of the "Just say 'no'" attitude which is strong these days.
Folinskyinla is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2008, 12:15 am
  #3  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 12
dip your toe is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Moving on from an E2

Thanks for the reply. Our current E2 investment has two locations with an approx joint value of just over two million. A new renewal is currently in progress. We are researching into the idea of selling one location and re-investing through an EB5 visa into a business in the same field with a value of over 1 million. A brand new start up facility built from the ground up. The theory being that we will still maintain an E2 status on the unsold location whilst we got the new business on the EB5 up and running.

Would be interested to know why you avoid EB5's like the plague. I would be reluctant to invest in an EB5 if I didn't have control of the project.
dip your toe is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2008, 4:58 am
  #4  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,266
Folinskyinla is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Moving on from an E2

Originally Posted by dip your toe
Thanks for the reply. Our current E2 investment has two locations with an approx joint value of just over two million. A new renewal is currently in progress. We are researching into the idea of selling one location and re-investing through an EB5 visa into a business in the same field with a value of over 1 million. A brand new start up facility built from the ground up. The theory being that we will still maintain an E2 status on the unsold location whilst we got the new business on the EB5 up and running.

Would be interested to know why you avoid EB5's like the plague. I would be reluctant to invest in an EB5 if I didn't have control of the project.
Hi:

Liability.
Folinskyinla is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2008, 11:13 am
  #5  
Just Joined
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 12
dip your toe is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Moving on from an E2

Originally Posted by Folinskyinla
Hi:

Liability.
For some reason that made me smile.

Does anyone know if you can apply for an EB5 whilst maintaining E2 staus? and if you can, and the EB5 is granted do you have to relinquish your E2 status? In my proposed scenario if the EB5 was granted and the E2 had to be relinquished would I be able to transfer the second location to EB5 status? With our without paying CGT?

Or am I, not for the first time, barking up the wrong tree?
dip your toe is offline  
Old Feb 26th 2008, 2:22 pm
  #6  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,266
Folinskyinla is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Moving on from an E2

Originally Posted by dip your toe
For some reason that made me smile.

Does anyone know if you can apply for an EB5 whilst maintaining E2 staus? and if you can, and the EB5 is granted do you have to relinquish your E2 status? In my proposed scenario if the EB5 was granted and the E2 had to be relinquished would I be able to transfer the second location to EB5 status? With our without paying CGT?

Or am I, not for the first time, barking up the wrong tree?
Hi:

In regards to my old firm [not me personally] -- been there done that.
Folinskyinla is offline  
Old May 24th 2008, 1:50 am
  #7  
Just Joined
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 9
karel is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Moving on from an E2

I think the biggest issue is that for E-2 visa you have to prove that you are intending to return back home. So it directly contradicts with EB-5 visa.

What if E-2 is held in husband name and wife applies for EB-5 visa through the investment. Did anyone tried that? It seems as the least risky way to proceed.
karel is offline  
Old May 24th 2008, 2:01 am
  #8  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,266
Folinskyinla is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Moving on from an E2

Originally Posted by karel
I think the biggest issue is that for E-2 visa you have to prove that you are intending to return back home. So it directly contradicts with EB-5 visa.
Hi:

The "E" non-immigrant classification is one of the few that does NOT contain an express requirement of a home abroad with no intent of abandonment. So, the intent to return home is quite attenuated.

The old fashioned "dual intent" argument would apply in this case. [BTW, this argument was fashioned in the days before the current 214(b) which is mistakenly called "dual intent" as to H & L visas. And yes, I know that many lawyers use that term. But I remember the context in which 214(b) was amended -- it simply obviated the need for "dual intent" for H & L. But it still exists for E's inasmuch as there is no time limit on E's.
Folinskyinla is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.