Michael Jackson - Verdict
#16
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,894
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Guilty till proven rich & famous.... The American Way.
#17
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Originally Posted by franc111s
In your oppinion. 12 people of our peers don't think so and I bet they went in with an open mind too. Hope I never find you on my jury. H'e s weirdo sure, but I never believed for one minute he was guilty - the evidence was pathetic, made up like friggin jackanory.
If we locked up all the weirdo's in Hollywood, I guess the free-ways would be easier to travel on.
If we locked up all the weirdo's in Hollywood, I guess the free-ways would be easier to travel on.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Originally Posted by britvic
Here Here franc111s well said, I'm so relieved for Michael and in tears watching the verdict, should never have gone to trial in the first place.
Actually I hope he counter sues the defendants parents to make an example to the dick head irresponsable morons that like to use their little dears as a money making scheme.
#19
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Originally Posted by ImHere
Actually I hope he counter sues the defendants parents to make an example to the dick head irresponsable morons that like to use their little dears as a money making scheme.
#20
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Anyone care to place a bet on MJ re-releasing "Smooth criminal" to kick start his career!
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Originally Posted by rincewind
Blimey, how many MJ threads are running now. I can't possibly argue on all of them
#22
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,296
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Originally Posted by ImHere
Actually I hope he counter sues the defendants parents to make an example to the dick head irresponsable morons that like to use their little dears as a money making scheme.
Back to the topic. I think there was more than enough doubt established to acquitt Jackson- the prosecution didn't really have a case, as it turns out. I believe Jackson tries to look and act like Peter Pan in his Neverland having sleepovers with lost boys- no doubt trying to have the normal childhood he never had. Eccentric, yes absolutely.. but child molestor? nahhh. He was far too open about his activities for one thing- IMO.... in all innocence.
#23
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 857
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Originally Posted by DonnaElvira
Luckily, at the end of the day, juries tend to go by the evidence presented to them, not their 'gut' feeling or what they 'believe'. The evidence presented did not prove, beyond all reasonable doubt, that MJ was guilty. So they had to find him innocent.
I am one of the camp who didn't believe that he molested this particular boy (and the only one in my household). Others I know, may not have believed the charge by this boy, but thought he should have been found guilty because of all the other 'stories' ... which really would have been an injustice.
#24
BE Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 857
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Originally Posted by britvic
.... should never have gone to trial in the first place.
#25
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Originally Posted by Taffyles
There should be an investigation into the mother and charges brought- she is abusing her children.
Back to the topic. I think there was more than enough doubt established to acquitt Jackson- the prosecution didn't really have a case, as it turns out. I believe Jackson tries to look and act like Peter Pan in his Neverland having sleepovers with lost boys- no doubt trying to have the normal childhood he never had. Eccentric, yes absolutely.. but child molestor? nahhh. He was far too open about his activities for one thing- IMO.... in all innocence.
Back to the topic. I think there was more than enough doubt established to acquitt Jackson- the prosecution didn't really have a case, as it turns out. I believe Jackson tries to look and act like Peter Pan in his Neverland having sleepovers with lost boys- no doubt trying to have the normal childhood he never had. Eccentric, yes absolutely.. but child molestor? nahhh. He was far too open about his activities for one thing- IMO.... in all innocence.
Whatever the parent's "m.o." was, I think they should be investigated. Wasn't there some deal with them and JC Penny's?? Didn't the parents so them too??
#26
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Originally Posted by britvic
should never have gone to trial in the first place.
I feel this case had to go to trial to either confirm or deny the allegations. For me, the truth is now known yet there will be some that feel this is an injustice.
If he had paid this bunch off, it would have made him look more guilty when he wasn't according to the jury.
#27
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Another forum I'm on has some interesting information about the pay off on the old case from someone who went to Neverland (as a cancer patient, as part of the "Make a wish" foundation) as a young teenager, and has kept in touch ever since.
Apparantly the pay off was against Michaels wishes, but was under instruction from the insurance company of his record label. It wasn't even his money.
Of course, that could be bollocks, but she seems pretty sure!
Apparantly the pay off was against Michaels wishes, but was under instruction from the insurance company of his record label. It wasn't even his money.
Of course, that could be bollocks, but she seems pretty sure!
#28
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Case was one of the biggest farces I have seen in my life. Glad the jury saw through the serial liars. The only thing sickening about this case was that a mother would put her children through anything for a cash windfall. Well done MJ!
#29
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
The most horrifying aspect of today's events must be the news that MJ is going to do a "Victory" tour with his brothers. :scared:
#30
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Nevada b4 California b4 Colorado b4 Valley of plastic and sand, b4 London
Posts: 2,025
Re: Michael Jackson - Verdict
Looks like many people were hoping he was guilty without any evidence. Just amasing how people can get labelled just by being charged with something and later aquitted by their peers in a court of law. I pray to God I never have some of these people on this board as a jury should I even end up in court for something I never done.
Originally Posted by franc111s
In your oppinion. 12 people of our peers don't think so and I bet they went in with an open mind too. Hope I never find you on my jury. H'e s weirdo sure, but I never believed for one minute he was guilty - the evidence was pathetic, made up like friggin jackanory.
If we locked up all the weirdo's in Hollywood, I guess the free-ways would be easier to travel on.
If we locked up all the weirdo's in Hollywood, I guess the free-ways would be easier to travel on.