Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
#121
Account Closed
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,865
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
So... gun in the home = suicide by gun: clearly wrong.
Ian
#122
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
I see this as, yet another, fallacious argument. It might be more difficult for a child to commit suicide without a gun handy... but someone who is bent on suicide is going to follow through. I say this as a former high school teacher who lost two students to suicide... both had guns in the home, and both chose to die by hanging.
So... gun in the home = suicide by gun: clearly wrong.
Ian
So... gun in the home = suicide by gun: clearly wrong.
Ian
#123
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
I see this as, yet another, fallacious argument. It might be more difficult for a child to commit suicide without a gun handy... but someone who is bent on suicide is going to follow through. I say this as a former high school teacher who lost two students to suicide... both had guns in the home, and both chose to die by hanging.
So... gun in the home = suicide by gun: clearly wrong.
Ian
So... gun in the home = suicide by gun: clearly wrong.
Ian
hanged himself from a tree outside his door so the neighbors could see ... he had two pistols in the house
#124
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
I'm not going to get into whether or not suicides or accidents are more or less likely to happen in a household with a gun or not, we can argue statistics on that until Hell freezes over, and still not reach an agreement.
However, on the question on whether or not a gun offers real protection, my take is rather simple. In my opinion, 3 conditions needs to be met:
1. The operator has to be trained in how to use the gun properly.
2. If the operator points a gun at someone, the operator has to be prepared to fire it.
3. If the operator is prepared to fire, the operator also has to be able and prepared to shoot to kill.
If all 3 conditions are not met and the operator hesitates or fumbles in a threat situation, bad things can happen.
I received extensive firearms training when I was in the military, so for me condition 1 is met. I also feel fairly certain that in a combat situation where you are most likely firing at someone from a distance and operating as a military unit, I would have no problem pulling the trigger.
In a one-on-one home invasion situation or a confrontation on the street, I'm not so sure. So I choose not to keep a gun in my house, I keep a baseball bat around instead. On the street, I just use common sense and stay alert.
I don't really have a problem with anyone who choose to get a gun for protection. I choose to not keep one around, but that does not mean that my choice is the right choice for everyone else. It's a free country, make your own choice. But unless all 3 conditions I outlined above are met, I personally think that a gun for 'protection' really offers nothing but a false sense of security.
That's my 2 cents on the matter.
However, on the question on whether or not a gun offers real protection, my take is rather simple. In my opinion, 3 conditions needs to be met:
1. The operator has to be trained in how to use the gun properly.
2. If the operator points a gun at someone, the operator has to be prepared to fire it.
3. If the operator is prepared to fire, the operator also has to be able and prepared to shoot to kill.
If all 3 conditions are not met and the operator hesitates or fumbles in a threat situation, bad things can happen.
I received extensive firearms training when I was in the military, so for me condition 1 is met. I also feel fairly certain that in a combat situation where you are most likely firing at someone from a distance and operating as a military unit, I would have no problem pulling the trigger.
In a one-on-one home invasion situation or a confrontation on the street, I'm not so sure. So I choose not to keep a gun in my house, I keep a baseball bat around instead. On the street, I just use common sense and stay alert.
I don't really have a problem with anyone who choose to get a gun for protection. I choose to not keep one around, but that does not mean that my choice is the right choice for everyone else. It's a free country, make your own choice. But unless all 3 conditions I outlined above are met, I personally think that a gun for 'protection' really offers nothing but a false sense of security.
That's my 2 cents on the matter.
#125
Peace onion
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,686
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
Why liberals should love the second amendment:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/20...cond-Amendment
Steerpike, just to point out the obvious, this article is posted on Daily Kos. These are your people.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/20...cond-Amendment
Steerpike, just to point out the obvious, this article is posted on Daily Kos. These are your people.
#126
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
Why liberals should love the second amendment:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/20...cond-Amendment
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/20...cond-Amendment
#128
Peace onion
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,686
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
You are a scary individual, Brit3964.
A living document, eh? You know better than Thomas Jefferson?
By your logic, your free speech rights are actually out of mode.
I said so. I'm going to impose restrictions on them. How do you like that?
A living document, eh? You know better than Thomas Jefferson?
By your logic, your free speech rights are actually out of mode.
I said so. I'm going to impose restrictions on them. How do you like that?
#131
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
Why do you believe the Constitution is set in stone? It can be changed. The criteria simply has never been met with regard to the right to bear arms.
#133
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
Some would like to interpret the Constitution narrowly (read conservatively). Not me. Yes you are right, it has been changed, 27 times in fact.
#135
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
I think people read the Constitution in an egocentric manner much like we approach everything in life.