Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
#46
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
I'm less certain. The counter argument is that people don't commit crimes in the expectation of being caught. Of course, then it becomes a question of perception and calculation of probabilities and risk, a complex calculus which we know folks are notoriously poor at.
Some people keep their nose clean, not because they are honest and good and moral, but rather solely because the consequences are too costly. I do not think this is necessarily the vast majority of the population though ... that's why I worded my response the way that I did.
EDIT TO ADD: To clarify, I'm also including in this example people who have had brushes with the law yet never reoffend.
Last edited by Leslie; Jul 2nd 2010 at 8:20 pm.
#47
Peace onion
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,686
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
It would freak me out being handcuffed. It's also humiliating.
Which is why I always carry a standard handcuff key on the inside of my belt, which is just the perfect height for access should one be unfortunate enough to be detained. Undetectable too.
So here's a thought - how would you restrain a one armed suspect? Cuff his hand to his belt loop? Not strong enough. A belt? Kind of defeats the purpose.
Which is why I always carry a standard handcuff key on the inside of my belt, which is just the perfect height for access should one be unfortunate enough to be detained. Undetectable too.
So here's a thought - how would you restrain a one armed suspect? Cuff his hand to his belt loop? Not strong enough. A belt? Kind of defeats the purpose.
#48
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
It would freak me out being handcuffed. It's also humiliating.
Which is why I always carry a standard handcuff key on the inside of my belt, which is just the perfect height for access should one be unfortunate enough to be detained. Undetectable too.
So here's a thought - how would you restrain a one armed suspect? Cuff his hand to his belt loop? Not strong enough. A belt? Kind of defeats the purpose.
Which is why I always carry a standard handcuff key on the inside of my belt, which is just the perfect height for access should one be unfortunate enough to be detained. Undetectable too.
So here's a thought - how would you restrain a one armed suspect? Cuff his hand to his belt loop? Not strong enough. A belt? Kind of defeats the purpose.
One arm? Handcuff the hand to the opposite leg. That would be pretty humiliating.
#50
Peace onion
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,686
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
Plus, how would the suspect sit in the Crown Vic on the way to the station?
#51
Peace onion
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,686
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
I shouldn't go here, but what about thalidomide?
#53
Peace onion
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,686
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
They can speak. Hitler whipped a whole country into a frenzy using the written and spoken word. Free speech can be very dangerous.
#54
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
You could hook the handcuff to the leg cuff. Sort of like they do when they use five sets of handcuffs on huge fat people.
#55
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
Just stuff something in their mouths then - it's not like they can stop you. And gouge out their eyes to be safe.
#56
Peace onion
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,686
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?
But they could choke. They have those spit hoods. Perhaps a ring-gag.
#60
Re: Do you think police and laws are too tough in USA?