"Arizona initiative inspires others"
Nov 10th 2004, 2:10 pm
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Arizona initiative inspires others"
Arizona initiative inspires others
The passage of an Arizona immigration initiative requiring verifiable
identification to vote or receive public benefits has spurred similar
efforts in other states and created panic among some Hispanics, who
are questioning whether it is safe to go to work, shop or send their
children to school.
at http://www.washtimes.com/national/20...3436-8100r.htm
The passage of an Arizona immigration initiative requiring verifiable
identification to vote or receive public benefits has spurred similar
efforts in other states and created panic among some Hispanics, who
are questioning whether it is safe to go to work, shop or send their
children to school.
at http://www.washtimes.com/national/20...3436-8100r.htm
Nov 10th 2004, 3:41 pm
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: "Arizona initiative inspires others"
Mike wrote on 11/10/2004 7:10:
> Arizona initiative inspires others
> The passage of an Arizona immigration initiative requiring verifiable
> identification to vote or receive public benefits has spurred similar
> efforts in other states and created panic among some Hispanics, who
> are questioning whether it is safe to go to work, shop or send their
> children to school.
> at http://www.washtimes.com/national/20...3436-8100r.htm
It is going to be shot down like the infamous CA Prop. 187 was shot
down by the courts in 1995. In other words, it is most likely unconstitutional.
-Joe
> Arizona initiative inspires others
> The passage of an Arizona immigration initiative requiring verifiable
> identification to vote or receive public benefits has spurred similar
> efforts in other states and created panic among some Hispanics, who
> are questioning whether it is safe to go to work, shop or send their
> children to school.
> at http://www.washtimes.com/national/20...3436-8100r.htm
It is going to be shot down like the infamous CA Prop. 187 was shot
down by the courts in 1995. In other words, it is most likely unconstitutional.
-Joe
