British Expats

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Trailer Park (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/)
-   -   Planespotting (https://britishexpats.com/forum/trailer-park-96/planespotting-742453/)

Michael Mar 21st 2014 4:21 pm

Re: Planespotting
 

Originally Posted by Pulaski (Post 11185125)
According to Wikipedia, it does.

I can't help but think that for really long range/ time operations, provision of bunks and food prep/ storage might therefore be the missing piece of the puzzle, and surely wouldn't add much weight.


So refueling of P-8's will become available as the search for MH370 continues. :rofl:

The P8-A wasn't delivered until November 2013 and suspect a P-8 may possibly have been dispatched. The P8-A is still not in full production so it may still be in the testing stage.

Pulaski Mar 21st 2014 4:29 pm

Re: Planespotting
 

Originally Posted by Michael (Post 11185130)
The P8-A wasn't delivered until November 2013 and suspect a P-8 may possibly have been dispatched.

I was joking about the lack of (any) meaningful progress to date in finding MH370 and that you reported that training for the refueling capability would not begin until 2015.

Michael Mar 21st 2014 4:34 pm

Re: Planespotting
 

Originally Posted by Pulaski (Post 11185132)
I was joking about the "refueling" aspect, for which you reported training would not begin until 2015.

Possibly one crew has already performed in flight refueling. They'd have to train a crew during the testing stage to make sure it all works and changes don't need to be made before they can start training other crews in 2015.

Michael Mar 21st 2014 4:44 pm

Re: Planespotting
 

Originally Posted by Pulaski (Post 11185125)
I can't help but think that for really long range/ time operations, provision of bunks and food prep/ storage might therefore be the missing piece of the puzzle, and surely wouldn't add much weight.

With it already very heavy, I suspect there is a lot of detection and fire control equipment as well as ordinance using up most of the available space. Doubling the size of the crew and adding beds and a bigger galley may not be possible due to space restrictions. With a crew, it probably has a weight that is heavier than a fully loaded 737-800 since it has a higher maximum takeoff weight than the 737-800 but that is probably classified since different configurations are available. The P-8I for India is different than the P-8A for the US.

Pulaski Mar 21st 2014 5:00 pm

Re: Planespotting
 

Originally Posted by Michael (Post 11185142)
With it already very heavy, I suspect there is a lot of detection and fire control equipment as well as ordinance using up most of the available space. Doubling the size of the crew and adding beds and a bigger galley may not be possible due to space restrictions. With a crew, it appears to have a weight that is heavier than a fully loaded 737-800 but that is probably classified since different configurations are available.

I was assuming that with ordinance, machinery, and fuel, that weight (not space) is the limiting factor, as it is invariably on almost all large aircraft. Given refueling capability, you might therefore give up 2000lbs of fuel at take-off (not fuel capacity), and add five more crew (half the weight) and some bunks and a small galley and fridge (the other 1,000lbs) with no loss of functionality. Then you'd have to refuel say 30 minutes sooner? .... Maybe my thinking is too simplistic.

Michael Mar 21st 2014 7:49 pm

Re: Planespotting
 

Originally Posted by Pulaski (Post 11185151)
I was assuming that with ordinance, machinery, and fuel, that weight (not space) is the limiting factor, as it is invariably on almost all large aircraft. Given refueling capability, you might therefore give up 2000lbs of fuel at take-off (not fuel capacity), and add five more crew (half the weight) and some bunks and a small galley and fridge (the other 1,000lbs) with no loss of functionality. Then you'd have to refuel say 30 minutes sooner? .... Maybe my thinking is too simplistic.

Two U.S. spy planes are now hunting for the jet, including an advanced P-8A Poseidon designed to spot submarines.

http://news.msn.com/world/us-search-...r25-mln-so-far

A P-8A with in flight refueling capabilities was dispatched so maybe with the right crew, the plane can be refueled in flight. However the P3-C also has in flight refueling capabilities but they are searching only 2 hours and then returning so maybe there isn't a refueling tanker in the area. I believe the P8-A can stay aloft longer than the original designed P-8 or up to about 10 hours total (about a 2-3 hour search window if flying from Perth).

I can only imagine what may be in the P8-A but it may be laid out like rooms with each having a large flat panel screen with individual controllable cameras for visual searches, sonar displays, and radar displays with controls for all as well as fire control. Each of the crew members may be individually visually searching as well as monitoring other displays. There may possibly also be some mechanism that can automatically reload ordinances as ordinances are launched.

A 737-800 costs about $70 million and production P8-As cost $169 million without the ordinance ($111 million for the airframe, $20 million for the engines, and $32 million for the avionics) after initial development costs of $3.89 billion.

http://www.ausn.org/Portals/0/pdfs/f...ct%20Sheet.pdf

Michael Mar 22nd 2014 7:14 am

Re: Planespotting
 
4 Attachment(s)
The following are some pictures of the interior of a P-8.


Yorkieabroad Mar 22nd 2014 11:47 am

Re: Planespotting
 

Originally Posted by Michael (Post 11185826)
The following are some pictures of the interior of a P-8.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=sRWF8uVaK...yer_detailpage

I want to see what happens to those guys in the 3rd photo on take off/ landing:lol: presumably they have some more...appropriate seating?

civilservant Mar 22nd 2014 11:48 am

Re: Planespotting
 

Originally Posted by Yorkieabroad (Post 11186055)
I want to see what happens to those guys in the 3rd photo on take off/ landing:lol: presumably they have some more...appropriate seating?

:lol:

That would take some explaining..

lansbury Mar 22nd 2014 12:51 pm

Re: Planespotting
 

Originally Posted by Yorkieabroad (Post 11186055)
I want to see what happens to those guys in the 3rd photo on take off/ landing:lol: presumably they have some more...appropriate seating?

That's what the handles by the side of the monitors are for. Hold on during take off and landing.

Yorkieabroad Mar 22nd 2014 2:44 pm

Re: Planespotting
 

Originally Posted by lansbury (Post 11186097)
That's what the handles by the side of the monitors are for. Hold on during take off and landing.

I did wonder.....:)
Same for a hard bank to starboard?
How about to port...do the monitors have airbags?

Michael Mar 22nd 2014 2:45 pm

Re: Planespotting
 
2 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by lansbury (Post 11186097)
That's what the handles by the side of the monitors are for. Hold on during take off and landing.

That picture was taken from an article about the P-8I. Maybe that version is only available for people that that had practice going to school in India.:D

Michael Mar 23rd 2014 3:26 am

Re: Planespotting
 
I noticed that the artist rendition of the 2nd picture of the P8 has a major flaw. Can you spot it?

civilservant Mar 23rd 2014 3:28 am

Re: Planespotting
 
Raked wingtips rather than sharklets?

Michael Mar 23rd 2014 3:31 am

Re: Planespotting
 

Originally Posted by civilservant (Post 11186825)
Raked wingtips rather than sharklets?

Nope. In fact it is so ridiculous that it appears the artist was pulling a fast one to see what he could get away with.


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:53 am.

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.