![]() |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11185125)
According to Wikipedia, it does.
I can't help but think that for really long range/ time operations, provision of bunks and food prep/ storage might therefore be the missing piece of the puzzle, and surely wouldn't add much weight. So refueling of P-8's will become available as the search for MH370 continues. :rofl: |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by Michael
(Post 11185130)
The P8-A wasn't delivered until November 2013 and suspect a P-8 may possibly have been dispatched.
|
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11185132)
I was joking about the "refueling" aspect, for which you reported training would not begin until 2015.
|
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11185125)
I can't help but think that for really long range/ time operations, provision of bunks and food prep/ storage might therefore be the missing piece of the puzzle, and surely wouldn't add much weight.
|
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by Michael
(Post 11185142)
With it already very heavy, I suspect there is a lot of detection and fire control equipment as well as ordinance using up most of the available space. Doubling the size of the crew and adding beds and a bigger galley may not be possible due to space restrictions. With a crew, it appears to have a weight that is heavier than a fully loaded 737-800 but that is probably classified since different configurations are available.
|
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by Pulaski
(Post 11185151)
I was assuming that with ordinance, machinery, and fuel, that weight (not space) is the limiting factor, as it is invariably on almost all large aircraft. Given refueling capability, you might therefore give up 2000lbs of fuel at take-off (not fuel capacity), and add five more crew (half the weight) and some bunks and a small galley and fridge (the other 1,000lbs) with no loss of functionality. Then you'd have to refuel say 30 minutes sooner? .... Maybe my thinking is too simplistic.
http://news.msn.com/world/us-search-...r25-mln-so-far A P-8A with in flight refueling capabilities was dispatched so maybe with the right crew, the plane can be refueled in flight. However the P3-C also has in flight refueling capabilities but they are searching only 2 hours and then returning so maybe there isn't a refueling tanker in the area. I believe the P8-A can stay aloft longer than the original designed P-8 or up to about 10 hours total (about a 2-3 hour search window if flying from Perth). I can only imagine what may be in the P8-A but it may be laid out like rooms with each having a large flat panel screen with individual controllable cameras for visual searches, sonar displays, and radar displays with controls for all as well as fire control. Each of the crew members may be individually visually searching as well as monitoring other displays. There may possibly also be some mechanism that can automatically reload ordinances as ordinances are launched. A 737-800 costs about $70 million and production P8-As cost $169 million without the ordinance ($111 million for the airframe, $20 million for the engines, and $32 million for the avionics) after initial development costs of $3.89 billion. http://www.ausn.org/Portals/0/pdfs/f...ct%20Sheet.pdf |
Re: Planespotting
4 Attachment(s)
The following are some pictures of the interior of a P-8.
|
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by Michael
(Post 11185826)
The following are some pictures of the interior of a P-8.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=sRWF8uVaK...yer_detailpage |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by Yorkieabroad
(Post 11186055)
I want to see what happens to those guys in the 3rd photo on take off/ landing:lol: presumably they have some more...appropriate seating?
That would take some explaining.. |
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by Yorkieabroad
(Post 11186055)
I want to see what happens to those guys in the 3rd photo on take off/ landing:lol: presumably they have some more...appropriate seating?
|
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by lansbury
(Post 11186097)
That's what the handles by the side of the monitors are for. Hold on during take off and landing.
Same for a hard bank to starboard? How about to port...do the monitors have airbags? |
Re: Planespotting
2 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by lansbury
(Post 11186097)
That's what the handles by the side of the monitors are for. Hold on during take off and landing.
|
Re: Planespotting
I noticed that the artist rendition of the 2nd picture of the P8 has a major flaw. Can you spot it?
|
Re: Planespotting
Raked wingtips rather than sharklets?
|
Re: Planespotting
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 11186825)
Raked wingtips rather than sharklets?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:53 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.