The Oscars 2010 tonight!
#226
Re: The Oscars 2010 tonight!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Oher
#227
Re: The Oscars 2010 tonight!
Read the wiki on Michael Oher and you get a little more realistic take on what actually happened. It's too bad because it would have been an even more interesting story if they hadn't sanitized it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Oher
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Oher
Has the wiki entry been sanitized, or the movie? I'm not quite sure what you're refering to.
#229
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: North Charleston,SC. born in Stockport,UK.
Posts: 10,109
Re: The Oscars 2010 tonight!
Well if you read the Texas Monthly article (I think you have to join though) you'll find that a white male writer from Texas came to a similar conclusion. The movie wasn't even about the boy (Michael Oher) who overcame his almost insurmountable past (albeit with a little help and that is GREAT. Don't we all need a little help as kids?) but rather about a rich white woman who suffered the horror of being snubbed by the junior league. There's nothing wrong with the story but rather the intellectual dishonesty with which it was told.
The thing that pissed me off really is the way that Vanessa Williams made it sound like the Mom only took in the boy because he was black (as if she were 'saving' him, she said it's yet another story of whites saving black people!!)and that didn't come through in the movie in any way, nor in any of the interviews I have seen with the Mom or Sandra Bullock. It just smacked of reverse prejudice to me
#230
Re: The Oscars 2010 tonight!
I watched the movie (a couple times) and I don't recall anything about her being snubbed by the junior league in the movie?
The thing that pissed me off really is the way that Vanessa Williams made it sound like the Mom only took in the boy because he was black (as if she were 'saving' him, she said it's yet another story of whites saving black people!!)and that didn't come through in the movie in any way, nor in any of the interviews I have seen with the Mom or Sandra Bullock. It just smacked of reverse prejudice to me
The thing that pissed me off really is the way that Vanessa Williams made it sound like the Mom only took in the boy because he was black (as if she were 'saving' him, she said it's yet another story of whites saving black people!!)and that didn't come through in the movie in any way, nor in any of the interviews I have seen with the Mom or Sandra Bullock. It just smacked of reverse prejudice to me
I didn't see it that way. The point that Williams was making was that it was another movie about black people needing white people to "save" them. The way the movie was slanted was not exactly as it actually happened - the tone of the film being that he would have never made it without them. Truth be told he had something they wanted and they had something he wanted. It was a mutually beneficial relationship where both sides came out of it better off (on many levels) than when they went in. In reality, they didn't take him in just because he was black. They took him in because he was a football protege with a really shitty home life. Football was his ticket out of the ghetto and their schools needed his talent. Win/win.
Another point made by other critics (not Williams) is that every other black character in the movie was demonized.
It is a real life "feel good" story that got changed in subtle and insidious ways to make one group look more benevolent than they really were and the other group to look more evil than they really were. Why not leave it as it really was?
Anyway, not everybody agrees with Williams and I, the NAACP nominated the movie for several awards.
Last edited by Leslie; Mar 10th 2010 at 7:44 pm.
#231
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: North Charleston,SC. born in Stockport,UK.
Posts: 10,109
#232
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Re: The Oscars 2010 tonight!
I think people often like stories about one lucky person getting 'saved' from a bad situation, but I'm not keen on them. They seem to send the message that we don't need to change the crap things about society because there are guardian angel types who will intervene.
#233
Re: The Oscars 2010 tonight!
I think people often like stories about one lucky person getting 'saved' from a bad situation, but I'm not keen on them. They seem to send the message that we don't need to change the crap things about society because there are guardian angel types who will intervene.
#234
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 41,518
Re: The Oscars 2010 tonight!
I agree. I dislike this particular one because it actually minimizes all of his hard work and exceptional talent and maximizes their savior role. They wouldn't have been nearly as interested in saving him if he had be the talentless son of a crackhead. I'm okay with that but apparently Hollywood wasn't.
#237
Re: The Oscars 2010 tonight!
As I heard from native Texans, in places like Dallas, Odessa, Houston etc, it was not uncommon for star players from other cities or schools to suddenly receive a job offer in a different area of the state or city just to get the kid to play there. Of course, when he was injured or crippled for life, the dad was quietly let go. I seem to recall a 60 minutes, or 20/20 story on the same type of abuses.
#238
Re: The Oscars 2010 tonight!
A great book on the subject is Friday Night Lights: A Town, a Team, and a Dream.
As I heard from native Texans, in places like Dallas, Odessa, Houston etc, it was not uncommon for star players from other cities or schools to suddenly receive a job offer in a different area of the state or city just to get the kid to play there. Of course, when he was injured or crippled for life, the dad was quietly let go. I seem to recall a 60 minutes, or 20/20 story on the same type of abuses.
As I heard from native Texans, in places like Dallas, Odessa, Houston etc, it was not uncommon for star players from other cities or schools to suddenly receive a job offer in a different area of the state or city just to get the kid to play there. Of course, when he was injured or crippled for life, the dad was quietly let go. I seem to recall a 60 minutes, or 20/20 story on the same type of abuses.