Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
#16
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
Well that's a circular argument if there ever was one, because at the moment there are no reliable records because ID is not required, so we don't know who voted and using whose voting registration?
Perhaps the answer is to beef up security around mail-in votes, and require each in-person voter to have one digit stained (one specific digit, doesn't matter which so long as it's consistent for everyone) with indelible ink, as is used in some other countries, so that at least we could be reasonably sure it is only possible to vote once.
Perhaps the answer is to beef up security around mail-in votes, and require each in-person voter to have one digit stained (one specific digit, doesn't matter which so long as it's consistent for everyone) with indelible ink, as is used in some other countries, so that at least we could be reasonably sure it is only possible to vote once.
#17
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
It also helps to remember that obstructions to voting were a central part of Jim Crow legislation. In this country, voting restrictions have a nasty legacy of racism attached to them.
And it's no coincidence that it's the red states that are most eager to have ID requirements -- they don't want certain kinds of people to vote. Some things never change.
And it's no coincidence that it's the red states that are most eager to have ID requirements -- they don't want certain kinds of people to vote. Some things never change.
#18
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
Yes, they are! ... Without an ID check at the point the vote is cast there is nothing to stop me giving my neighbor's name and taking his vote, or visiting each polling station in the area and voting a genuine properly registered name at each location, just not my name. And because there is no control to stop that happening nobody has any data to prove it isn't. As I said earlier, a finger dipped in indelible stain/ink would largely solve the problem with rather less controversy, I presume.
#19
Bloody Yank
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 4,186
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
Voter fraud is generally futile because each individual vote counts for very little. It takes a lot of fraud to change the outcome with an election, and it just isn't that easy.
Studies show that voter fraud is minimal and not significant enough to put someone other than the preferred candidate into office. The much greater problem comes from using bogus voting restrictions to disenfranchise substantial numbers of legitimate voters just because they would most likely vote for Democrats if permitted to cast their ballots.
#20
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
Yes, they are! ... Without an ID check at the point the vote is cast there is nothing to stop me giving my neighbor's name and taking his vote, or visiting each polling station in the area and voting a genuine properly registered name at each location, just not my name. And because there is no control to stop that happening nobody has any data to prove it isn't. As I said earlier, a finger dipped in indelible stain/ink would largely solve the problem with rather less controversy, I presume.
By we, I mean you, as I am still an alien
#21
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
I wouldn't be so opposed to it if republicans spent as much time trying to solve a real problem as they do trying to solve an imagined problem. 50 million people are without health insurance with total health care costing the US economy 16% of gdp and their only solution is a free market system which is what caused the problem in the first place.
#23
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
I wouldn't be so opposed to it if republicans spent as much time trying to solve a real problem as they do trying to solve an imagined problem. 50 million people are without health insurance with total health care costing the US economy 16% of gdp and their only solution is a free market system which is what caused the problem in the first place.
Not sure your description of the Repubs is correct, but it does not really matter.
So how would you describe Obamacare?
#24
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
You have a lot of company. But clearly you are among the people who are not an American as defined by Cruz and Boner, who know so well that real Americans don't want Obamacare.
Regards, JEff
Regards, JEff
#26
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
I like free stuff, lots of Americans do as well.
A lot of those are just finding out they were sold a pup.
A lot of those are just finding out they were sold a pup.
#27
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
So, you've been practicing forging his signature have you? Be sure to get to the polling place before he does, or he will already have signed the book.
Regards, JEff
Regards, JEff
#28
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
True
A comparison between something easy to do vs something difficult and the double standards involved.
A comparison between something easy to do vs something difficult and the double standards involved.
#29
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
Even within the democratic party, there are currently powerful lobbies that can defeat any real reform. For example, Evan Bayh's wife was on the board of directors for a health insurance company collecting over $1 million per year so no way could Evan vote for a single payer system. Prior to getting that job (work a couple days every three months), she was a junior lawyer.
There is a lot more to do to get the costs down but just sitting on your hands thinking that the US has the perfect system except the only thing wrong is it needs less regulation, less lawsuits, and people need to pay more for their health care is not the solution. It is strange that the republicans claim to be frugal and won't allocate $100 billion for infrastructure projects but see nothing wrong with nearly $2.5 trillion per year going for health care costs. The only thing they seem to care about is who is going to pay the bill, the government or you (which is the same thing except the rich can afford it and the average person can't) and have no ideas on how to reduce the costs.
Last edited by Michael; Oct 5th 2013 at 3:13 am.
#30
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
Yes, they are! ... Without an ID check at the point the vote is cast there is nothing to stop me giving my neighbor's name and taking his vote, or visiting each polling station in the area and voting a genuine properly registered name at each location, just not my name. And because there is no control to stop that happening nobody has any data to prove it isn't. As I said earlier, a finger dipped in indelible stain/ink would largely solve the problem with rather less controversy, I presume.
I used to think there was no reason NOT to have photo ID, but others on here have convinced me that there are poor, old people who no longer drive who also no longer bother to renew their drivers licenses.