Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA > The Trailer Park
Reload this Page >

Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 4th 2013, 11:07 pm
  #16  
The Unmod
 
paddingtongreen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Glen Mills, PA
Posts: 8,870
paddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond reputepaddingtongreen has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

Originally Posted by Pulaski
Well that's a circular argument if there ever was one, because at the moment there are no reliable records because ID is not required, so we don't know who voted and using whose voting registration?

Perhaps the answer is to beef up security around mail-in votes, and require each in-person voter to have one digit stained (one specific digit, doesn't matter which so long as it's consistent for everyone) with indelible ink, as is used in some other countries, so that at least we could be reasonably sure it is only possible to vote once.
That first para is very strange. The voter's rolls exist, names are checked against the lists. ID cards are not a factor. The lists have been checked exhaustively by proponents of the ID Card for evidence of falsity, dead people registering etc. and a negligible amount found.
paddingtongreen is offline  
Old Oct 4th 2013, 11:19 pm
  #17  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
sir_eccles's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,106
sir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
It also helps to remember that obstructions to voting were a central part of Jim Crow legislation. In this country, voting restrictions have a nasty legacy of racism attached to them.

And it's no coincidence that it's the red states that are most eager to have ID requirements -- they don't want certain kinds of people to vote. Some things never change.
Worth reminding people what all these red states did the second the SCOTUS overturned parts of the VRA...
sir_eccles is offline  
Old Oct 4th 2013, 11:56 pm
  #18  
 
Pulaski's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Dixie, ex UK
Posts: 52,463
Pulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond reputePulaski has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

Originally Posted by paddingtongreen
That first para is very strange. The voter's rolls exist, names are checked against the lists. ID cards are not a factor. .....
Yes, they are! ... Without an ID check at the point the vote is cast there is nothing to stop me giving my neighbor's name and taking his vote, or visiting each polling station in the area and voting a genuine properly registered name at each location, just not my name. And because there is no control to stop that happening nobody has any data to prove it isn't. As I said earlier, a finger dipped in indelible stain/ink would largely solve the problem with rather less controversy, I presume.
Pulaski is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2013, 12:13 am
  #19  
Bloody Yank
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 4,186
RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

Originally Posted by Pulaski
Yes, they are! ... Without an ID check at the point the vote is cast there is nothing to stop me giving my neighbor's name and taking his vote, or visiting each polling station in the area and voting a genuine properly registered name at each location, just not my name.
There's nothing to stop you from driving a semi truck through your neighbor's house, but you probably haven't done that, either.

Voter fraud is generally futile because each individual vote counts for very little. It takes a lot of fraud to change the outcome with an election, and it just isn't that easy.

Studies show that voter fraud is minimal and not significant enough to put someone other than the preferred candidate into office. The much greater problem comes from using bogus voting restrictions to disenfranchise substantial numbers of legitimate voters just because they would most likely vote for Democrats if permitted to cast their ballots.
RoadWarriorFromLP is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2013, 12:56 am
  #20  
BE Irregular
 
RICH's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Tampa Bay Florida
Posts: 4,849
RICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond reputeRICH has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

Originally Posted by Pulaski
Yes, they are! ... Without an ID check at the point the vote is cast there is nothing to stop me giving my neighbor's name and taking his vote, or visiting each polling station in the area and voting a genuine properly registered name at each location, just not my name. And because there is no control to stop that happening nobody has any data to prove it isn't. As I said earlier, a finger dipped in indelible stain/ink would largely solve the problem with rather less controversy, I presume.
If there were proper ID checks, we the people would have to take responsibility for the officials we elect. As it stands, our hands are clean.

By we, I mean you, as I am still an alien
RICH is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2013, 1:07 am
  #21  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 10,678
Michael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

I wouldn't be so opposed to it if republicans spent as much time trying to solve a real problem as they do trying to solve an imagined problem. 50 million people are without health insurance with total health care costing the US economy 16% of gdp and their only solution is a free market system which is what caused the problem in the first place.
Michael is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2013, 1:48 am
  #22  
Account Closed
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

Originally Posted by RICH
If there were proper ID checks, we the people would have to take responsibility for the officials we elect. As it stands, our hands are clean.

By we, I mean you, as I am still an alien
Me too.

But that sounds horribly radical.
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2013, 2:05 am
  #23  
Account Closed
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

Originally Posted by Michael
I wouldn't be so opposed to it if republicans spent as much time trying to solve a real problem as they do trying to solve an imagined problem. 50 million people are without health insurance with total health care costing the US economy 16% of gdp and their only solution is a free market system which is what caused the problem in the first place.
More than 16%

Not sure your description of the Repubs is correct, but it does not really matter.

So how would you describe Obamacare?
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2013, 2:06 am
  #24  
Member
 
jeffreyhy's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,049
jeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

You have a lot of company. But clearly you are among the people who are not an American as defined by Cruz and Boner, who know so well that real Americans don't want Obamacare.

Regards, JEff
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
I am personally benefiting from the new law.
jeffreyhy is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2013, 2:07 am
  #25  
Member
 
jeffreyhy's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,049
jeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

A step in the right direction.

But I thought from the subject line that this was a thread about voter ID?

Regards, JEff
Originally Posted by Boiler
So how would you describe Obamacare?
jeffreyhy is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2013, 2:08 am
  #26  
Account Closed
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

I like free stuff, lots of Americans do as well.

A lot of those are just finding out they were sold a pup.
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2013, 2:11 am
  #27  
Member
 
jeffreyhy's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,049
jeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond reputejeffreyhy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

So, you've been practicing forging his signature have you? Be sure to get to the polling place before he does, or he will already have signed the book.

Regards, JEff
Originally Posted by Pulaski
Without an ID check at the point the vote is cast there is nothing to stop me giving my neighbor's name and taking his vote, ...
jeffreyhy is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2013, 2:14 am
  #28  
Account Closed
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

True

A comparison between something easy to do vs something difficult and the double standards involved.
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2013, 2:19 am
  #29  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Michael's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 10,678
Michael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond reputeMichael has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

Originally Posted by Boiler
More than 16%

Not sure your description of the Repubs is correct, but it does not really matter.

So how would you describe Obamacare?
Obamacare is not the solution but a compromise to get the country moving in a direction that could possibly solve the problem in the future. Even trying to get a "single payer" system was not possible and that would have likely reduced premiums by 15%-20% and/or made the Silver Plan the lowest tier at the cost of the Bronze Plan.

Even within the democratic party, there are currently powerful lobbies that can defeat any real reform. For example, Evan Bayh's wife was on the board of directors for a health insurance company collecting over $1 million per year so no way could Evan vote for a single payer system. Prior to getting that job (work a couple days every three months), she was a junior lawyer.

There is a lot more to do to get the costs down but just sitting on your hands thinking that the US has the perfect system except the only thing wrong is it needs less regulation, less lawsuits, and people need to pay more for their health care is not the solution. It is strange that the republicans claim to be frugal and won't allocate $100 billion for infrastructure projects but see nothing wrong with nearly $2.5 trillion per year going for health care costs. The only thing they seem to care about is who is going to pay the bill, the government or you (which is the same thing except the rich can afford it and the average person can't) and have no ideas on how to reduce the costs.

Last edited by Michael; Oct 5th 2013 at 3:13 am.
Michael is offline  
Old Oct 5th 2013, 5:40 am
  #30  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Steerpike's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 13,162
Steerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond reputeSteerpike has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting

Originally Posted by Pulaski
Yes, they are! ... Without an ID check at the point the vote is cast there is nothing to stop me giving my neighbor's name and taking his vote, or visiting each polling station in the area and voting a genuine properly registered name at each location, just not my name. And because there is no control to stop that happening nobody has any data to prove it isn't. As I said earlier, a finger dipped in indelible stain/ink would largely solve the problem with rather less controversy, I presume.
There seem to be some gaping holes in your logic here ... for your theory to hold true, not one of those neighbors, or randomly selected names, would themselves have to show up to vote; if any one of them did, then a problem would be found and an investigation held - which would trigger a 'problem' statistic. In other words ... if you voted using your neighbors name, and your neighbor shows up to vote, an 'alarm' would be raised.

I used to think there was no reason NOT to have photo ID, but others on here have convinced me that there are poor, old people who no longer drive who also no longer bother to renew their drivers licenses.
Steerpike is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.