Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
Oct 8th 2013, 5:23 pm
#106
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
I have no intention of doing a transcript. You have the link.
I mentioned some of the key aspects, text would lose the nuances anyway.
I mentioned some of the key aspects, text would lose the nuances anyway.
Oct 8th 2013, 5:25 pm
#107
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
Oh he did not nail it, if it had been a Dimbleby or someone similar it would have been quite fascinating.
US Politicians do not allow themselves to be interviewed like that.
US Politicians do not allow themselves to be interviewed like that.
Oct 8th 2013, 5:29 pm
#108
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
I'm not asking for a transcript; I'm asking you to back up your assertion that he "nailed it" on Obamacare. You're very fond of throwing out one-liners, but when you get called on them to back them up, you do precisely what you do here. Quite honestly, you're frequently little more than a troll.
Last edited by Giantaxe; Oct 8th 2013 at 5:31 pm.
Oct 8th 2013, 5:33 pm
#109
Bloody Yank
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 4,186
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
He wants a single payer system. That's a lovely opinion, but it's not what is currently on the table and not likely to be implemented anytime soon. I don't see how his conclusion his helpful in dealing with the ACA or its implementation.
The software glitches are annoying and embarrassing for the moment, but they do nothing to change the nature of the program itself or its long-term viability.
The software glitches are annoying and embarrassing for the moment, but they do nothing to change the nature of the program itself or its long-term viability.
Oct 8th 2013, 6:42 pm
#111
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
I'm not asking for a transcript; I'm asking you to back up your assertion that he "nailed it" on Obamacare. You're very fond of throwing out one-liners, but when you get called on them to back them up, you do precisely what you do here. Quite honestly, you're frequently little more than a troll.
Oct 8th 2013, 6:51 pm
#112
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
I apologize, I misquoted you. You said "John Stewart tonight put it very succinctly". Of course, that makes absolutely no difference to my assertion that your failure to back up one-line assertions such as this frequently makes you little more than a troll.
Oct 8th 2013, 7:33 pm
#113
Account Closed
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
I referenced it, but no I am not going to go through his script line by line.
Oct 8th 2013, 7:36 pm
#114
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,865
Oct 8th 2013, 7:52 pm
#115
Bloody Yank
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 4,186
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
Jon Stewart thinks that the websites should be working properly.
I doubt that anyone who supports the healthcare law would disagree with that position.
However, the websites aren't central to the healthcare law. If my insurer's website crashes, that does not result in a cancellation of my policy or a change in coverage. In the scheme of things, the issues with the websites are not that big of a deal.
I doubt that anyone who supports the healthcare law would disagree with that position.
However, the websites aren't central to the healthcare law. If my insurer's website crashes, that does not result in a cancellation of my policy or a change in coverage. In the scheme of things, the issues with the websites are not that big of a deal.
Oct 8th 2013, 8:05 pm
#116
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 10,678
Re: Compulsory Photo ID for Voting
Jon Stewart thinks that the websites should be working properly.
I doubt that anyone who supports the healthcare law would disagree with that position.
However, the websites aren't central to the healthcare law. If my insurer's website crashes, that does not result in a cancellation of my policy or a change in coverage. In the scheme of things, the issues with the websites are not that big of a deal.
I doubt that anyone who supports the healthcare law would disagree with that position.
However, the websites aren't central to the healthcare law. If my insurer's website crashes, that does not result in a cancellation of my policy or a change in coverage. In the scheme of things, the issues with the websites are not that big of a deal.
