Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
#286
Re: Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
Not sure I personally have a Government, have not voted for 15 or so years.
Realpolitik?
I recognise the need, just the way things are. You can discuss the extent.
I get confused when those for example of a left of centre position, women's rights etc etc support a totalitarian religion. Makes no sense to me.
A Government holding its nose and doing what is needed is more understandable.
Realpolitik?
I recognise the need, just the way things are. You can discuss the extent.
I get confused when those for example of a left of centre position, women's rights etc etc support a totalitarian religion. Makes no sense to me.
A Government holding its nose and doing what is needed is more understandable.
It is a nuanced conversation and I've racked my brain for a way to talk about this where I wouldn't (within two posts) be accused of supporting something that I do not. It's impossible though because there are certain people who unfailingly, if you don't agree with their wholesale condemnation of 1.6 billion people, you get accused of defending terrorists.
I've posted on here for years about my opposition to the treatment of women in, in the name of religion, some of the most horrific situations you can possibly imagine. I've posted on here about my hatred of the burqua as well as all of the methods of men controlling women's bodies in currently existing societies.
I just wish people would use their brains. Two things can be true at once.
When Warren Jeffs was raping little girls and trafficking in human bodies ... where was the similar outrage against Mormons? Why didn't we hold Mitt Romney to task over all that? Because he had nothing to do with it, that's why.
#287
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
I seem to have lost my impressive reply.
Anyway you are assuming it is a tiny tiny number that hold a peverted interpretation of their religion.
I do not. All the evidence says otherwise.
Let us put it another way if it was the BNP or whoever of the same ilk does every member hold the most extreme views, obviously not.
Anyway you are assuming it is a tiny tiny number that hold a peverted interpretation of their religion.
I do not. All the evidence says otherwise.
Let us put it another way if it was the BNP or whoever of the same ilk does every member hold the most extreme views, obviously not.
#288
Re: Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
Though to use WJ as an example of lunatic thinking, "behind" him there were hundreds of people who knew what was going on and who openly or tacitly supported him, or tolerated it. I have no doubt the math in respect of the jihadis heading to Syria and their supporter is comparable.
Last edited by Pulaski; Jan 11th 2015 at 4:52 pm.
#289
Re: Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
I don't support any religion. A religion is a thing, it can't do anything. I support (and oppose) people and I get nervous when large swaths of people are getting blamed for events they had no knowledge of, no control over, and are just as disgusted with as I am.
It is a nuanced conversation and I've racked my brain for a way to talk about this where I wouldn't (within two posts) be accused of supporting something that I do not. It's impossible though because there are certain people who unfailingly, if you don't agree with their wholesale condemnation of 1.6 billion people, you get accused of defending terrorists.
It is a nuanced conversation and I've racked my brain for a way to talk about this where I wouldn't (within two posts) be accused of supporting something that I do not. It's impossible though because there are certain people who unfailingly, if you don't agree with their wholesale condemnation of 1.6 billion people, you get accused of defending terrorists.
I just wish people would use their brains. Two things can be true at once.
When Warren Jeffs was raping little girls and trafficking in human bodies ... where was the similar outrage against Mormons? Why didn't we hold Mitt Romney to task over all that? Because he had nothing to do with it, that's why.
When Warren Jeffs was raping little girls and trafficking in human bodies ... where was the similar outrage against Mormons? Why didn't we hold Mitt Romney to task over all that? Because he had nothing to do with it, that's why.
Last edited by Michael; Jan 11th 2015 at 5:23 pm.
#290
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
Amusingly if it was unIslamic the sentence would be death.
#292
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
I think you miss out on those. Must be a bit of shortage anyway.
#294
Re: Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
I wonder how the landscape is going to look in 20 years...scary..
#295
Bloody Yank
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 4,186
Re: Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
Then I guess we could say the same thing about the Germans and the Japanese during WWII. Although they may not have been directly complicit in the atrocities, they were willing subjects that turned a blind eye. When someone agrees with extremist's ideas, they are complicit.
Feel free to rush in to give Islam the credit.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/wo...ge-crisis.html
#296
Re: Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
A Muslim employee of the Kosher market in Paris saved 15 people by hiding them in the basement, then helped the police to plan the raid.
Feel free to rush in to give Islam the credit.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/wo...ge-crisis.html
Feel free to rush in to give Islam the credit.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/wo...ge-crisis.html
However, certainly in my opinion, I question if the core teachings of some religions, including Islam, are antithetical to the society in which their practitioners exist.
And if they are..how can the disparity possibly be reconciled as to minimise conflict?
#297
Re: Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
I seem to have lost my impressive reply.
Anyway you are assuming it is a tiny tiny number that hold a peverted interpretation of their religion.
I do not. All the evidence says otherwise.
Let us put it another way if it was the BNP or whoever of the same ilk does every member hold the most extreme views, obviously not.
Anyway you are assuming it is a tiny tiny number that hold a peverted interpretation of their religion.
I do not. All the evidence says otherwise.
Let us put it another way if it was the BNP or whoever of the same ilk does every member hold the most extreme views, obviously not.
#298
Re: Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
A Muslim employee of the Kosher market in Paris saved 15 people by hiding them in the basement, then helped the police to plan the raid.
Feel free to rush in to give Islam the credit.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/wo...ge-crisis.html
Feel free to rush in to give Islam the credit.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/wo...ge-crisis.html
#299
Re: Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
So how do we identify the radicals and eradicate them?
With the help of the community?
Through education?
With the help of the community?
Through education?
#300
Re: Charlie Hebdo shooting in France
Then I guess we could say the same thing about the Germans and the Japanese during WWII. Although they may not have been directly complicit in the atrocities, they were willing subjects that turned a blind eye. When someone agrees with extremist's ideas, they are complicit.
Warren Jeff ran a cult that for about 100 years, the Mormon Church disavowed and had church laws in place against such practices. When the Mormon church was like the Warren Jeff cult, people were outraged at the Mormon church and that is what drove the church to Utah.