Go Back  British Expats > Living & Moving Abroad > USA > The Trailer Park
Reload this Page >

A brief whine regarding Veteran's Day

A brief whine regarding Veteran's Day

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 15th 2014, 2:02 am
  #61  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 0
scrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond reputescrubbedexpat091 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: A brief whine regarding Veteran's Day

Originally Posted by Pulaski
Round here a house like that, same age, same size, can be had for about $30k, ..... except it would be on a lot about twice the size.
Land is not something you will get in Vancouver...lol... All the lots are small for the most part (there are pockets of old homes, well more like mansions that are 1 million+ that have larger lots) but the old middle working class neighborhoods are all on small lots.

Large lots appear to never have been fashionable in Vancouver except for the rich.

Now of course developers are buying entire blocks of houses, ripping them out, and building either condos to sell at inflated prices, or building million dollar + homes, so where 2 houses used to be, they now have 1 larger house, but the lot is still small.

The house I lived in, was built in the early 40's and for all intents was a dump but when the owner sold it, she got almost a million dollars, 900 something, not a bad return on investment since she bought in the 70's.

In my town the lots are larger, my GF's mom is on 1/2 acre and its assessed at 700,000, would be higher if the house was in good shape, but its a fixer upper.

A new house next door on a smaller lot, but brand new is listed at 850,000.

Cheapest listed right now is 490,000 but again a fixer upper, so not move in ready and not for someone who lacks the funds or ability to do or pay for the repairs.

This region is in a world of hurt if the housing market ever collapses.
scrubbedexpat091 is offline  
Old Nov 15th 2014, 5:35 pm
  #62  
Bob
BE Site Lead
 
Bob's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 92,170
Bob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: A brief whine regarding Veteran's Day

Originally Posted by hungryhorace
The worst place I've been here is Lawrence. What a complete shit hole. Though, I didn't see any trailer parks?



I was aware of the ridiculous cost for 'low cost' housing. How that is figured to be 'low cost' is beyond me!



What irritated me was the compulsion for luxury apartments to provide a set percentage of rooms to 'low income' homes at a generous discount. Why should they get to live in the same quality of housing as us, just because they don't earn as much? That's incredibly unfair.
Lawrence is a first class shit hole...but there are loads of hidden trailer parks all over the place. Some pretty nice ones too.

As for the low cost in the condo's, it's part of the requirement for them to provide it if they want to build the place, because the town needs to keep that 10% set aside and building up a large number of houses without anything set aside wont' work because the town isn't going to build something specific.
Bob is offline  
Old Nov 17th 2014, 3:54 pm
  #63  
BE Commentator
 
S Folinsky's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 8,427
S Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: A brief whine regarding Veteran's Day

On Veteran's Day one of our paralegals and myself walked to the local Starbucks to get our free cup of coffee. We had both served in the "Army" -- myself in the US Army and the paralegal in the Soviet Army. SB had no problem.

BTW, I was once telling one of the younger attorneys in the office that a uniform aspect of military service anywhere in the world is "painting rocks white." She scoffed at that but our paralegal went "Of course" when relating the experience in the Soviet Army. However, unlike the Soviet Army, we never had to paint the grass green.
S Folinsky is offline  
Old Nov 17th 2014, 4:00 pm
  #64  
BE Commentator
 
S Folinsky's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 8,427
S Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: A brief whine regarding Veteran's Day

BTW, I was co-counsel of a case many years ago where our client needed a medical discharge from the Navy and they let get out instead on alienage. [BTW, the Government attorney who was reserve JAG agreed with us that the Navy had been a bunch of jerks and offered to assist us in changing the discharge once the case was over]. A person who declines to serve on the basis of alienage gives up their right to naturalize. Ultimately, the court ruled that the provision applied to conscription only.

Now to the point -- the regulations provide that service in the armed forces of a NATO member exempts one from the bar noted above. One of our arguments was that three years in the United States Navy was service in the armed forces of NATO. The lower court ruled that the regulation implicitly covered non-US service despite that the regulation had no such language in it. The Court of Appeals ignored that argument.
S Folinsky is offline  
Old Nov 17th 2014, 4:12 pm
  #65  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 5,154
hungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond reputehungryhorace has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: A brief whine regarding Veteran's Day

Originally Posted by S Folinsky
On Veteran's Day one of our paralegals and myself walked to the local Starbucks to get our free cup of coffee. We had both served in the "Army" -- myself in the US Army and the paralegal in the Soviet Army. SB had no proble
British Armed Forces are required to remove their combat gear from most retail locations in England I believe. Tesco's received some negative PR for it a few years back. The RAF were even advised to remove their uniform in public: BBC NEWS | UK | England | Cambridgeshire | Brown condemns no-uniform advice
hungryhorace is offline  
Old Nov 17th 2014, 4:38 pm
  #66  
Bob
BE Site Lead
 
Bob's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 92,170
Bob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond reputeBob has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: A brief whine regarding Veteran's Day

Originally Posted by hungryhorace
British Armed Forces are required to remove their combat gear from most retail locations in England I believe. Tesco's received some negative PR for it a few years back. The RAF were even advised to remove their uniform in public: BBC NEWS | UK | England | Cambridgeshire | Brown condemns no-uniform advice
They've not been banned from wearing uniform outside of base for quite a few years now.

It's just not advised and they need base head honcho approval to do so.
Bob is offline  
Old Nov 17th 2014, 5:06 pm
  #67  
BE Commentator
 
S Folinsky's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 8,427
S Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond reputeS Folinsky has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: A brief whine regarding Veteran's Day

Originally Posted by hungryhorace
British Armed Forces are required to remove their combat gear from most retail locations in England I believe. Tesco's received some negative PR for it a few years back. The RAF were even advised to remove their uniform in public: BBC NEWS | UK | England | Cambridgeshire | Brown condemns no-uniform advice
When I was in the US Army in the early 70's, we were not allowed to wear our "fatigue" ["battle dress"] uniforms off base. When off-base, were allowed to wear our "Class A" or "Class B" uniforms. Judging from what military recruiters now wear, it seems that army now allows the wearing of fatigue like uniforms off base.

My dad tells me that during WWII, civilian clothes were not allowed at all for those in the military.
S Folinsky is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.