Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12801878)
Pelosi looked pissed, perhaps she was checked for a knife?
You're supposed to be statesman for crying out loud. Shake her hand. Don't tear up the speach in front of TV cameras. It's quite simple really. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 12802157)
Even as a left learner, that whole situation just seemed completely petty.
You're supposed to be statesman for crying out loud. Shake her hand. Don't tear up the speach in front of TV cameras. It's quite simple really. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 12802157)
Even as a left learner, that whole situation just seemed completely petty.
You're supposed to be statesman for crying out loud. Shake her hand. Don't tear up the speach in front of TV cameras. It's quite simple really.
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 12802161)
The fact that the (lack of a) handshake and the tearing up of some paper is treated as the story rather than any of the substance of what Trump said shows the absurdity of the political discourse in this country.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Honestly, who cares what he says? At this point the fact that every other word was a lie is baked in with Trump.
Hopefully (although I am increasingly despondent that the Dems are doing their best to self destruct) we won't have to worry about him after Jan 2021. |
Re: 2020 Election
Seems they are still counting in Iowa.
Trump ratings up to 49 apparently higher than Obama at the same point. |
Re: 2020 Election
The names of several people were on that written copy of the speech including the 100 year old Tuskagee Airman. It was a shabby act of peevishness which I sincerely hope will damage her politically in the future.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by dc koop
(Post 12802249)
The names of several people were on that written copy of the speech including the 100 year old Tuskagee Airman. It was a shabby act of peevishness which I sincerely hope will damage her politically in the future.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by dc koop
(Post 12802249)
The names of several people were on that written copy of the speech including the 100 year old Tuskagee Airman. It was a shabby act of peevishness which I sincerely hope will damage her politically in the future.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Elizabeth Warren caught.
|
Re: 2020 Election
So Trump was acquitted; his personal approval rating is now at an all-time high and his economic approval rating is highest of any president for the last two decades. Way to go Democrats :rolleyes:
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12802363)
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12802363)
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by BritInParis
(Post 12802384)
So Trump was acquitted; his personal approval rating is now at an all-time high and his economic approval rating is highest of any president for the last two decades. Way to go Democrats :rolleyes:
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12802394)
On the plus side 75% of the Iowa count is in.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12802174)
Seems they are still counting in Iowa.
Trump ratings up to 49 apparently higher than Obama at the same point. Will be interesting to see where the polls go over the next couple of weeks. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12802463)
538's poll of polls has him as 43.2%, lower than any post war president bar Truman at this stage of his term, but near Trump's high. Not sure why Truman's popularity tanked so suddenly at this point?
Will be interesting to see where the polls go over the next couple of weeks. Trump roughly 1,111 days in office so far Truman- Approx 1,085 days in Vetoed income tax reduction act. Bill passed by Congress over the president's veto the following day. Approx 1.128 days in Recognized new state of Israel. Approx 1,170 days in Signed Displaced Persons Act authorizing admission into the United States of 205,000 European displaced persons in the following two years. Approx 1,171 days in Ordered Berlin airlift, in conjunction with the British, in answer to Russian blockade of the portion of that city occupied by the Western powers. Blockade lasted until 12 May 1949. Approx 1,201 days in Signed Executive Order 9981, desegregating the United States Armed Forces. The order also established the President's Committee on Equality of Treatment and opportunity in the Armed Services. I used this website as resource. Might give an idea what caused the popularity drop? https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/educat...ears-1945-1949 |
Re: 2020 Election
Hillary has said she will consider the VP position.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12802548)
So my math might be a tad off so don't hold me to it 100%
Trump roughly 1,111 days in office so far Truman- Approx 1,085 days in Vetoed income tax reduction act. Bill passed by Congress over the president's veto the following day. Approx 1.128 days in Recognized new state of Israel. Approx 1,170 days in Signed Displaced Persons Act authorizing admission into the United States of 205,000 European displaced persons in the following two years. Approx 1,171 days in Ordered Berlin airlift, in conjunction with the British, in answer to Russian blockade of the portion of that city occupied by the Western powers. Blockade lasted until 12 May 1949. Approx 1,201 days in Signed Executive Order 9981, desegregating the United States Armed Forces. The order also established the President's Committee on Equality of Treatment and opportunity in the Armed Services. I used this website as resource. Might give an idea what caused the popularity drop? https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/educat...ears-1945-1949 |
Re: 2020 Election
Well the Iowa vote is nearly there, however it seems the last votes will be mailed in so could take a little longer.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by BritInParis
(Post 12802396)
Excellent progress. At this rate they may even have a candidate nominated in time for the 2024 election :nod:
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Anian
(Post 12802832)
If you ever wondered why the Democrats let an insignificant state go first in the primaries, seems to have been a smart choice.
Also, Iowa and New Hampshire have traditionally been much more about weeding out candidates who are non-starters than about predicting a future nominee. It's really a chance for the Tom Steyers and Tulsi Gabbards of the world to decide if they really want to keep going. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Hiro11
(Post 12802887)
Iowa goes first due to an Iowa state law, not due to Democrats' choice.
Also, Iowa and New Hampshire have traditionally been much more about weeding out candidates who are non-starters than about predicting a future nominee. It's really a chance for the Tom Steyers and Tulsi Gabbards of the world to decide if they really want to keep going. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by BritInParis
(Post 12802165)
Even after four years they’re still unable to stop themselves gifting Trump the narrative at every opportunity.
Yet another friend of mine - lifelong Democrat - said he thinks Trump will win. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 12802951)
No truer word was ever spoken. Not sure if they can recover from this one ...
Yet another friend of mine - lifelong Democrat - said he thinks Trump will win. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by BenK91
(Post 12802956)
I don't see how Trump could lose the 2020 election, it really looks like his to lose. The Democrats look like absolute chaos, the current crop of candidates seem to be doing a very good job of alienating moderate voters (much like Flower-Power Corbyn). There was a good talk this morning on NPR with some liberal, moderate and conservative voters and the general consensus from the non-liberals appeared to be that the word 'free' keeps getting bandied around by the Democrats (again, Corbyn-esque) and that it was concerning to them.
The 'optics' of Pelosi last night (tearing up the speech) were awful. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Hiro11
(Post 12802887)
Iowa goes first due to an Iowa state law, not due to Democrats' choice.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Guardian are reporting counting errors in Iowa.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12803004)
Guardian are reporting counting errors in Iowa.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12803004)
Guardian are reporting counting errors in Iowa.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Why cant Iowa just do a regular election? Why this caucus mumbo jumbo?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12803036)
Why cant Iowa just do a regular election? Why this caucus mumbo jumbo?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12803036)
Why cant Iowa just do a regular election? Why this caucus mumbo jumbo?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Jsmth321
(Post 12803036)
Why cant Iowa just do a regular election? Why this caucus mumbo jumbo?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Anian
(Post 12803002)
Any other state Democrat caucus could bring theirs forward to at least match it.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by BenK91
(Post 12803045)
Because Iowa is a nothing state and they want to feel special?
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by BenK91
(Post 12803045)
Because Iowa is a nothing state and they want to feel special?
It's home to over 3 million people. That is never "nothing." |
Re: 2020 Election
I’d be interested to know how much the election bandwagon adds to the state economy every four years relative to the national average.
|
Re: 2020 Election
NYT which I think could be described as friendly, has an in depth story on the Iowa results and their inaccuracies. Bernie seems to have given Iowa up as a bad job and moved on.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 12803296)
NYT which I think could be described as friendly, has an in depth story on the Iowa results and their inaccuracies. Bernie seems to have given Iowa up as a bad job and moved on.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 12803365)
... after declaring victory based on the popular vote which, like the actual election, counts for nothing. The irony. Looks like he and Buttigieg will end up with the same number of delegates unless the whole thing gets thrown out. Which is quite likely. Really the only result of Iowa is that it may hasten Biden’s decline.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 1:34 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.