![]() |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 12923070)
This is exactly my point - you end up getting a quiet residential area turned into party central, with drunk kids blasting music and then driving home drunk at 4am. This has apparently become worse since Covid-19, where bars / clubs have closed. Get 30 kids together, ask for $10 each, and rent a nice home somewhere for $300/night.
Regarding licensing - I think different countries treat this differently. As an example, Uber in UK towns are treated almost like taxis by the local authorities, while in the US, Uber is much less regulated. Vancouver just got Uber this year, but there are more licensing here than it seems in the US for Uber and Lyft and the like. Not quite as regulated as taxi's but not too far off. Need a BC class 4 commercial license Need a vehicle less than 9 years old with clean title BC Commercial vehicle inspection Uber has to maintain insurance as the drivers personal insurance policy doesn't cover Uber rides. The rates are regulated partially as well, the province has set minimum rates they can charge. There is a 30 cent drop off/pick up fee in certain areas of the city (congested areas) Uber/Lyft have to pay something like $150 per vehicle on their platform and each driver has to pay for a business license which I think is $100 per year. Just to start driving for Uber or the like you need a few hundred bucks just in fees. It's $4.50 just to get into the Uber in Vancouver before even moving (base fare + booking fee) It really took a lot for Uber to get into BC, no politician for years wanted to piss off the Taxi cartels, and their votes. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 12916640)
Your interesting report suggests that Trump raised a lot more (historically, this year to date) but has also spent a lot more to date, and the two sides are now 'close' in terms of 'cash remaining'. So if Biden is now out-raising Trump it would suggest perhaps Biden has a big advantage (in terms of ability to spend on ads over the next month) over Trump? OR, are 'ad buys' for October already pre-purchased from the existing 'spent' pile I wonder?
"Enthusiasm gap' sounds pretty ill-defined; I have very strong opposition to Trump, and relatively little enthusiasm for Biden; but my strong opposition to Trump is practically speaking an equivalence to enthusiasm for Biden, is it not? It's certainly motivating me to vote for Biden. |
Re: 2020 Election
received my ballot, filled it out, and submitted it this weekend. One more boring vote for Biden (and Kelly in the Senate). I went online today to check the status. Here's what I had to fill in:
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...f69c4e8a92.png So that's last name, house NUMBER (not street name), DOB, and then ONE of (SSN - last 4; Voter ID; State ID; Drivers License). The status came back as: https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/british...51e6e359fc.png I'll check again in a few days. I'm posting the details because I think zzrmark commented that anyone could guess at his info; not the case for me (Arizona). |
Re: 2020 Election
^^^ Yeah, that's better. Mine only needed my DOB and name. I'm sure that kind of data can be found on stalker sites such as Whitepages - can't say for sure as it's not something I'm given to doing but if I'm going to pay for a site to give me data on someone else I figure I'd be wanting their DOB and address as the barest minimum.
|
Re: 2020 Election
So much historical based drama recently has had so much contemporary relevance.not least the Netflix drama The Trial of the Chicago 7. Recommended.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 12923847)
So much historical based drama recently has had so much contemporary relevance.not least the Netflix drama The Trial of the Chicago 7. Recommended.
|
Re: 2020 Election
The muting of microphones only for the initial 2 minutes of a candidate's response means that there will still be opportunity for Biden to tell Trump to shut up, but now when one of them interrupts it's going to cost them time: (sorry no electrified anal probe)
"Time taken up during any interruptions will be returned to the other candidate." https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/world/...nses-1.5151993 |
Re: 2020 Election
I'm not really convinced that the rules will change anything. Trump can just yell and Bidens mike will pick it up, and the 9 minute exchanges will just be a repeat of the 1st debate.
It's only morbid fascination that will make me tune in since I've already voted. |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 12923931)
I'm not really convinced that the rules will change anything. Trump can just yell and Bidens mike will pick it up, and the 9 minute exchanges will just be a repeat of the 1st debate. It's only morbid fascination that will make me tune in since I've already voted.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by caretaker
(Post 12923872)
The muting of microphones only for the initial 2 minutes of a candidate's response means that there will still be opportunity for Biden to tell Trump to shut up, but now when one of them interrupts it's going to cost them time: (sorry no electrified anal probe)
"Time taken up during any interruptions will be returned to the other candidate." https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/world/...nses-1.5151993
Originally Posted by civilservant
(Post 12923931)
I'm not really convinced that the rules will change anything. Trump can just yell and Bidens mike will pick it up, and the 9 minute exchanges will just be a repeat of the 1st debate.
It's only morbid fascination that will make me tune in since I've already voted. ​​​​​​⠀‹ |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike;12923985[b
]Not only will Biden's mic still pick up Trump's voice[/b], but Biden's EARS will still pick up Trump's voice, which means he will still get distracted. Imagine trying to explain some policy position with an angry rude man yelling in your ear! Has the subject of screens come up? For the VP debate, there was a somewhat useless-looking plexiglass sheet, but I haven't heard for this debate.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by Steerpike
(Post 12923985)
Not only will Biden's mic still pick up Trump's voice, but Biden's EARS will still pick up Trump's voice, which means he will still get distracted. Imagine trying to explain some policy position with an angry rude man yelling in your ear! Has the subject of screens come up? For the VP debate, there was a somewhat useless-looking plexiglass sheet, but I haven't heard for this debate.
​​​​​​⠀‹ |
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by SpoogleDrummer
(Post 12923992)
I'd insist on greater physical distance between Biden and Trump due to Trump being a known spreader of the virus, who knows what members of his entourage are still infected.
|
Re: 2020 Election
Originally Posted by kimilseung
(Post 12923989)
Directional mics and filters should eliminate trump almost completely (if they chose - they may think it good TV to keep it), Biden's ears, as you say will not be able to do so.
|
Re: 2020 Election
One conduit for Russian disinformation is a former University of Ottawa professor:
"The platform, Global Research, features a Canadian domain name and offers an ever-expanding collection of conspiracy theories" https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/r...site-1.5767208 |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:35 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.