![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11739785)
Marco Rubio was saying something similar. It's strange as these people really need to understand what the separation of church and state means.
Oh and she actually married the same guy twice, so you seriously have to question that guy's sanity. |
Re: 2016 Election
Here we go. This can't help her run, but we knew it probably happened multiple times. Who's going to be the highest bidder? The DOJ, RNC, House Committees investigating her? Trump? Hillary? The Chinese, Russians and Iranians don't need to bid as they probably already have all of them.
Hillary Clinton Hacked Emails For Sale | Radar Online |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11739883)
Here we go. This can't help her run, but we knew it probably happened multiple times. Who's going to be the highest bidder? The DOJ, RNC, House Committees investigating her? Trump? Hillary? The Chinese, Russians and Iranians don't need to bid as they probably already have all of them.
Hillary Clinton Hacked Emails For Sale | Radar Online |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11739883)
Here we go. This can't help her run, but we knew it probably happened multiple times. Who's going to be the highest bidder? The DOJ, RNC, House Committees investigating her? Trump? Hillary? The Chinese, Russians and Iranians don't need to bid as they probably already have all of them.
Hillary Clinton Hacked Emails For Sale | Radar Online |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11739898)
There is an above average chance this is bollocks. I mean, it's under the sub-category of 'celebrity news', FFS. A case of 'consider the source', I believe. A cursory Google search didn't reveal any other sources backing up this so called 'exclusive'. Only an article in Huffington Post from yesterday about how the emails could have been hacked.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11739907)
It doesn't help that her IT guy is pleading the 5th. Can somebody explain this to me? Didn't he work for the DOS? How can you actually please the 5th when being questioned by the government about work you did for the government?
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11739909)
It is obviously bollocks.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11739909)
It is obviously bollocks.
|
Re: 2016 Election
The Republicans chase down Dem scandals as dogs chase their tails. Except that the dogs sometimes do manage to get their tails.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Trump to discuss loyalty pledge with Republican chairman
Apparently Trump has signed the aforementioned loyalty oath. He obviously just assumes he will get the nomination. I personally don't think it's worth the paper it's written on. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11739945)
Trump to discuss loyalty pledge with Republican chairman
Apparently Trump has signed the aforementioned loyalty oath. He obviously just assumes he will get the nomination. I personally don't think it's worth the paper it's written on. Just like a diploma from Trump University. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11739907)
It doesn't help that her IT guy is pleading the 5th. Can somebody explain this to me? Didn't he work for the DOS? How can you actually please the 5th when being questioned by the government about work you did for the government?
Sure the whole thing is being overblown, but Hillary has only got herself to blame for giving her opponents the opportunity. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11739956)
Hillary and her campaign really haven't helped themselves with this whole email thing. Making jokes about snapchat and cleaning the server with a cloth is just crass. Plus her whole reasoning that it was for convenience and not having to carry more than one device is clearly bollocks as there has had to be a shit ton of work done to make sure this server is secure. That plus the fact of having to determine if anything is classified or not, does not seem to make this very convenient.
Sure the whole thing is being overblown, but Hillary has only got herself to blame for giving her opponents the opportunity. Whenever you go to work anywhere, they give you an email. And they assign the password because it's THEIR email, not yours. When somebody quits or gets fired ... the password is changed and the account disabled or reassigned, depending on how things are set up. My company is annoying because they like to copy business stuff to our personal emails. They started doing this because certain elements were always claiming "they never got that email" ... I understand why they do it but it's freaking annoying and I never respond from my personal email. Conversely, I never say anything remotely personal on my work assigned email. I always run my work emails through the filter of being comfortable with anybody in the entire company reading it. Basically, Clinton kept control of all of her State emails and they had to come to her and ask for them after her term was over. It's unheard of but yet they knew and didn't do anything to stop her. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Leslie
(Post 11739979)
I've been trying to think of this from her point of view and it's just weird. Okay, so, when it all started, I assumed that she had chosen to use her own email out of laziness or convenience. But this was actually a server and email that she had set up after she got the DOS post. It wasn't something that she already had and was stubborn about continuing to use --- it was created for the specific purpose.
Whenever you go to work anywhere, they give you an email. And they assign the password because it's THEIR email, not yours. When somebody quits or gets fired ... the password is changed and the account disabled or reassigned, depending on how things are set up. My company is annoying because they like to copy business stuff to our personal emails. They started doing this because certain elements were always claiming "they never got that email" ... I understand why they do it but it's freaking annoying and I never respond from my personal email. Conversely, I never say anything remotely personal on my work assigned email. I always run my work emails through the filter of being comfortable with anybody in the entire company reading it. Basically, Clinton kept control of all of her State emails and they had to come to her and ask for them after her term was over. It's unheard of but yet they knew and didn't do anything to stop her. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_W...il_controversy What is a new thing is for the Secretary of State to make use of a .gov address. Kerry is the first to do so. The rules that required the SoS to do so only came in after Clinton was no longer SoS. Why she did what she did? Who knows. Having worked in gov situations, the likelihood is the gov servers where outdated junk. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11739985)
To be fair, using your own email servers in government is not a new thing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_W...il_controversy What is a new thing is for the Secretary of State to make use of a .gov address. Kerry is the first to do so. The rules that required the SoS to do so only came in after Clinton was no longer SoS. Why she did what she did? Who knows. Having worked in gov situations, the likelihood is the gov servers where outdated junk. She just wanted to control her own information --- both work and personal. I think it's as simple and as complicated as that. What I find the most fascinating, and quite ironic, is that Clinton is saying that in actuality everything is on the government servers because whenever she sent or copied an email it went to a .gov address. HOWEVER, the government is such complete shit at archiving that they actually don't have any of the emails. Had Clinton used the .gov account there would actually less of her emails still in existence than there are now. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:08 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.