2016 Election
Feb 12th 2016, 11:58 am
#4306
WTF?
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Homeostasis
Posts: 79,449
Re: 2016 Election
Now that Gilmore has suspended, this will really mix things up for the GOP!
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/12/jim-gilmore-suspends-presidential-campaign/
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/12/jim-gilmore-suspends-presidential-campaign/
Feb 12th 2016, 12:00 pm
#4307
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,885
Feb 12th 2016, 12:21 pm
#4309
WTF?
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Homeostasis
Posts: 79,449
Re: 2016 Election
Donald Trump has threatened to sue Ted Cruz for not being a citizen. Best. Day. Ever.
Feb 12th 2016, 1:37 pm
#4311
WTF?
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Homeostasis
Posts: 79,449
Re: 2016 Election
Hiya, Boilermaker. So, yes, I have been monitoring your avatar choices and what you are wearing right now is significantly better than the blue "Vote Hillary" one. At least now I won't get your posts confused with Paulry and Boomhauer. HOWEVER, as discussed infinitum ad nauseum, the dog must be reinstated. Full stop.
PS - Go Broncos
PS - Go Broncos
Feb 12th 2016, 1:46 pm
#4312
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: 2016 Election
OK
He has his scarf on which for size comparison is a 3ftx5ft Bronco flag.
He has his scarf on which for size comparison is a 3ftx5ft Bronco flag.
Feb 12th 2016, 2:01 pm
#4315
WTF?
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Homeostasis
Posts: 79,449
Re: 2016 Election
You should make a dog calendar.
Feb 12th 2016, 2:19 pm
#4316
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: 2016 Election
Hmmm Not sure if there is much business for those any longer.
Feb 12th 2016, 2:37 pm
#4318
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
Re: 2016 Election
At least I can always fall back on being the Office Poster of the Denver Broncos, Superbowl Champions Go Broncos
Feb 12th 2016, 3:33 pm
#4319
BE Forum Addict
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
Re: 2016 Election
According to the Florida Times-Union fact checker(s)' article of March 8, 2014, Zeifman did have the power to fire her and he refused to give her a letter of recommendation.
My argument had to do with Zeifman's charge that she wrote a brief arguing that Nixon didn't have the right to counsel in an impeachment hearing, and that her brief deliberately withheld an important precedent to the contrary (the Douglas impeachment) and that she confiscated the records of the Douglas impeachment so that no one else could access them.
My point was that had the brief been offered to the Court, it could have led to her disbarment and I said why. I further caveated that my point is valid IF the information were true. I predicted that Axlrod AND the Roadrunner would immediately leap in and I was right. The Twins just can't help themselves.
Feb 12th 2016, 5:34 pm
#4320
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,885
Re: 2016 Election
I didn't read or quote Snopes. I linked and referred to the Florida Times-Union Newspaper fact-checking article. Argue with the Florida Times-Union, fact checker, not me.
According to the Florida Times-Union fact checker(s)' article of March 8, 2014, Zeifman did have the power to fire her and he refused to give her a letter of recommendation.
My argument had to do with Zeifman's charge that she wrote a brief arguing that Nixon didn't have the right to counsel in an impeachment hearing, and that her brief deliberately withheld an important precedent to the contrary (the Douglas impeachment) and that she confiscated the records of the Douglas impeachment so that no one else could access them.
My point was that had the brief been offered to the Court, it could have led to her disbarment and I said why. I further caveated that my point is valid IF the information were true. I predicted that Axlrod AND the Roadrunner would immediately leap in and I was right. The Twins just can't help themselves.
According to the Florida Times-Union fact checker(s)' article of March 8, 2014, Zeifman did have the power to fire her and he refused to give her a letter of recommendation.
My argument had to do with Zeifman's charge that she wrote a brief arguing that Nixon didn't have the right to counsel in an impeachment hearing, and that her brief deliberately withheld an important precedent to the contrary (the Douglas impeachment) and that she confiscated the records of the Douglas impeachment so that no one else could access them.
My point was that had the brief been offered to the Court, it could have led to her disbarment and I said why. I further caveated that my point is valid IF the information were true. I predicted that Axlrod AND the Roadrunner would immediately leap in and I was right. The Twins just can't help themselves.
My point was that had the brief been offered to the Court, it could have led to her disbarment and I said why. I further caveated that my point is valid IF the information were true. I predicted that Axlrod AND the Roadrunner would immediately leap in and I was right. The Twins just can't help themselves.
And indeed if you continue to post such uncorroborated conspiracy stories, multiple posters will jump in.
