Wikiposts

2016 Election

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 28th 2016, 5:54 am
  #3661  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Thread Starter
 
sir_eccles's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8,106
sir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond reputesir_eccles has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
At this point, the left vs. right schism in American politics is one of smart vs. stupid.
There was a link I posted a while back from 538 about the difference between misinformed and uninformed. It seems to capture the issue better than just smart v stupid. Here it is to save you looking.

Trump Supporters Appear To Be Misinformed, Not Uninformed | FiveThirtyEight
sir_eccles is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 5:57 am
  #3662  
Account Closed
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
scrubbedexpat099 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 2016 Election

We are enjoying a nice bit of global warming over the next few days, but there is a big storm coming through next week.

And I filled up yesterday at $1.54!
scrubbedexpat099 is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 5:59 am
  #3663  
I have a comma problem
 
SultanOfSwing's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
SultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
I agree that there is no harm, and much good, that would come from further research into alternative energy sources. Eventually, the world's oil and gas reserves will be exhausted. I also agree that nuclear is a major way to go, although the environmentalists don't like it. As for wind, there are two views summarized here:
Wind power generates 140% of Denmark's electricity demand | Environment | The Guardian

and here: A Problem With Wind Power [AWEO.org]

At this time, and in the short run, there is no substitute for cheap fossil fuel power - and especially for the Third World. Only abundant cheap sources of power will lift Africa out of poverty and give their people a decent shot at good health and a comfortable life.
It has to be done in stages. Renewable energy isn't without its problems, of course. I think it'd be better to work on moving the richer countries to alternative energy and let the developing world 'catch up' as you say, by which time we will be in a position where the technology will have developed to the point where rolling it out in those countries will make sense.

We've got maybe 75-100 years before oil dries up, coal gives us 350. Part of our research should focus on cleaning up the use of those fuels as much as it should be about finding alternatives.

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
As for us, forcing the closing of our fossil-fueled power plants and replacement with renewable energy plants will drastically increase our energy costs and result in lower standards of living for all but the wealthy and the power elites. In addition, the big brains on the left are talking about huge transfers of wealth from the US by way of carbon taxes and swaps. By themselves, those will do nothing to cut planetary carbon emissions, but they will lower our standard of living.
It's not so much a forced closure of existing plants as much as a conversion to nuclear in the meantime to help with emissions and then we can work towards viable alternatives. It's not an overnight solution by any means and if it's done in the right way won't have anywhere near the kind of economical impact as you imply here.
SultanOfSwing is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 6:05 am
  #3664  
BE Forum Addict
 
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
It has to be done in stages. Renewable energy isn't without its problems, of course. I think it'd be better to work on moving the richer countries to alternative energy and let the developing world 'catch up' as you say, by which time we will be in a position where the technology will have developed to the point where rolling it out in those countries will make sense.

We've got maybe 75-100 years before oil dries up, coal gives us 350. Part of our research should focus on cleaning up the use of those fuels as much as it should be about finding alternatives.



It's not so much a forced closure of existing plants as much as a conversion to nuclear in the meantime to help with emissions and then we can work towards viable alternatives. It's not an overnight solution by any means and if it's done in the right way won't have anywhere near the kind of economical impact as you imply here.
Thanks, Sultan. This kind of calm, reasoned discussion and exploration of a complicated subject is what I hope to see more of in this thread.
FlaviusAetius is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 6:07 am
  #3665  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,892
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
Thanks, Sultan. This kind of calm, reasoned discussion and exploration of a complicated subject is what I hope to see more of in this thread.
Indeed. Which is why when you post crap like this:

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
97% of left-of-centre (the American centre) politicians and their adherents are in agreement that global warming is anthropomorphic (which is primarily Bush's Fault, by the way, the default position on everything that's gone wrong in the world).
you're going to get called on it.
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 6:10 am
  #3666  
BE Forum Addict
 
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by Giantaxe
Indeed. Which is why when you post crap like this:



you're going to get called on it.
What percentage of left-of-centre politicians and their adherents are in agreement with the theory of anthropomorphic global warming, in your view?
FlaviusAetius is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 6:12 am
  #3667  
I have a comma problem
 
SultanOfSwing's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
SultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
Thanks, Sultan. This kind of calm, reasoned discussion and exploration of a complicated subject is what I hope to see more of in this thread.
And that is why (as touched on by Zargof), if you look at my posts, or walls of text as they tend to go with subjects like this, you'll realise why Bernie tweeted what he did. Just too much to cover. I have a scientific inclination and I can barely touch on all the important points.
SultanOfSwing is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 6:16 am
  #3668  
I have a comma problem
 
SultanOfSwing's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
SultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
What percentage of left-of-centre politicians and their adherents are in agreement with the theory of anthropomorphic global warming, in your view?
To answer that you'd really to need to address the question of how many left-of-centre politicians are backed by the oil industry. There is a vested interest for many on the right to perpetuate climate change denial that simply isn't there on the left.

There are conservative Republicans who don't deny climate change either. This is a scientific issue anyway, first and foremost. Is the scientific community more left leaning? I don't know, but perhaps a slight lean to the left is desired in a community who is essentially working towards the betterment of mankind.
SultanOfSwing is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 6:16 am
  #3669  
Lost in BE Cyberspace
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 12,892
Giantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond reputeGiantaxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
What percentage of left-of-centre politicians and their adherents are in agreement with the theory of anthropomorphic global warming, in your view?
As it's the scientific consensus, I would expect a high percentage are, just as is the case for right-of-centre politicians in all western countries except the US.
Giantaxe is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 6:16 am
  #3670  
I love my brick!
 
zargof's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Peachy
Posts: 9,304
zargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
And that is why (as touched on by Zargof), if you look at my posts, or walls of text as they tend to go with subjects like this, you'll realise why Bernie tweeted what he did. Just too much to cover. I have a scientific inclination and I can barely touch on all the important points.
No, you misunderstand, Bernie didn't tweet that, someone else did as a summary of what Bernie said (it's a tweet after all).

If you look at the video, which I did afterwards, Bernie did as I expect expand on that. As usual Flavor Flav is tilting at windmills.
zargof is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 6:18 am
  #3671  
I have a comma problem
 
SultanOfSwing's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Fox Lake, IL (from Carrickfergus NI)
Posts: 49,598
SultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond reputeSultanOfSwing has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by zargof
No, you misunderstand, Bernie didn't tweet that, someone else did as a summary of what Bernie said (it's a tweet after all).

If you look at the video, which I did afterwards, Bernie did as I expect expand on that. As usual FlavaFlav is tilting at windmills.
OK, I guess I should have read what actually happened.

But the essence was the same - you have to keep a tweet short because there is just too much to go into as to why that person was wrong.
SultanOfSwing is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 6:31 am
  #3672  
Bloody Yank
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: USA! USA!
Posts: 4,186
RoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond reputeRoadWarriorFromLP has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
we need something more than some computer models and "consensus."
Surrounding the word "consensus" with quote marks in order to suggest that there is no consensus among those with the brain capacity to make informed judgments is an indication that you are worthy of the "stupid" label.

Your political universe is built upon misrepresentations and strawman arguments. Even basic facts seems to elude you. There isn't a political debate here, just the uninformed and misinformed cliche-spewing sheep who fancy themselves as being "conservative thinkers" (which appears at this point to be an oxymoron.)
RoadWarriorFromLP is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 6:31 am
  #3673  
BE Forum Addict
 
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by zargof
No, you misunderstand, Bernie didn't tweet that, someone else did as a summary of what Bernie said (it's a tweet after all).

If you look at the video, which I did afterwards, Bernie did as I expect expand on that. As usual Flavor Flav is tilting at windmills.
I agree with the Sultan on this. It would have been better for the poster to have included the video - if available - with the tweet, which was misleading.

Bernie gave the best explanation he could to the kid's question, but it would have been better for him to have avoided the usual arrogant - 'you're wrong' which needlessly embarrassed the kid in front of his schoolmates.
FlaviusAetius is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 6:36 am
  #3674  
BE Forum Addict
 
FlaviusAetius's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA USA
Posts: 1,206
FlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond reputeFlaviusAetius has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
Surrounding the word "consensus" with quote marks in order to suggest that there is no consensus among those with the brain capacity to make informed judgments is an indication that you are worthy of the "stupid" label.

Your political universe is built upon misrepresentations and strawman arguments. Even basic facts seems to elude you. There isn't a political debate here, just the uninformed and misinformed cliche-spewing sheep who fancy themselves as being "conservative thinkers" (which appears at this point to be an oxymoron.)
You project the image of an absolutely insufferable prig. Everyone should defer to your vast knowledge of every subject and worship your unparalleled intellect. Now if you could just learn to control yourself you would be perfection itself.
FlaviusAetius is offline  
Old Jan 28th 2016, 6:39 am
  #3675  
I love my brick!
 
zargof's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: Peachy
Posts: 9,304
zargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond reputezargof has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 2016 Election

Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
I agree with the Sultan on this. It would have been better for the poster to have included the video - if available - with the tweet, which was misleading.

Bernie gave the best explanation he could to the kid's question, but it would have been better for him to have avoided the usual arrogant - 'you're wrong' which needlessly embarrassed the kid in front of his schoolmates.
Keep tilting. You really have got your knickers in a twist over a non issue.

You should start a campaign to ensure that every politician treats everyone they talk to or about as the special snowflakes they are.
zargof is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.