2016 Election
#3661
Trump Supporters Appear To Be Misinformed, Not Uninformed | FiveThirtyEight
#3662
Account Closed
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2

We are enjoying a nice bit of global warming over the next few days, but there is a big storm coming through next week.
And I filled up yesterday at $1.54!
And I filled up yesterday at $1.54!
#3663
I agree that there is no harm, and much good, that would come from further research into alternative energy sources. Eventually, the world's oil and gas reserves will be exhausted. I also agree that nuclear is a major way to go, although the environmentalists don't like it. As for wind, there are two views summarized here:
Wind power generates 140% of Denmark's electricity demand | Environment | The Guardian
and here: A Problem With Wind Power [AWEO.org]
At this time, and in the short run, there is no substitute for cheap fossil fuel power - and especially for the Third World. Only abundant cheap sources of power will lift Africa out of poverty and give their people a decent shot at good health and a comfortable life.
Wind power generates 140% of Denmark's electricity demand | Environment | The Guardian
and here: A Problem With Wind Power [AWEO.org]
At this time, and in the short run, there is no substitute for cheap fossil fuel power - and especially for the Third World. Only abundant cheap sources of power will lift Africa out of poverty and give their people a decent shot at good health and a comfortable life.
We've got maybe 75-100 years before oil dries up, coal gives us 350. Part of our research should focus on cleaning up the use of those fuels as much as it should be about finding alternatives.
As for us, forcing the closing of our fossil-fueled power plants and replacement with renewable energy plants will drastically increase our energy costs and result in lower standards of living for all but the wealthy and the power elites. In addition, the big brains on the left are talking about huge transfers of wealth from the US by way of carbon taxes and swaps. By themselves, those will do nothing to cut planetary carbon emissions, but they will lower our standard of living.
#3664
It has to be done in stages. Renewable energy isn't without its problems, of course. I think it'd be better to work on moving the richer countries to alternative energy and let the developing world 'catch up' as you say, by which time we will be in a position where the technology will have developed to the point where rolling it out in those countries will make sense.
We've got maybe 75-100 years before oil dries up, coal gives us 350. Part of our research should focus on cleaning up the use of those fuels as much as it should be about finding alternatives.
It's not so much a forced closure of existing plants as much as a conversion to nuclear in the meantime to help with emissions and then we can work towards viable alternatives. It's not an overnight solution by any means and if it's done in the right way won't have anywhere near the kind of economical impact as you imply here.
We've got maybe 75-100 years before oil dries up, coal gives us 350. Part of our research should focus on cleaning up the use of those fuels as much as it should be about finding alternatives.
It's not so much a forced closure of existing plants as much as a conversion to nuclear in the meantime to help with emissions and then we can work towards viable alternatives. It's not an overnight solution by any means and if it's done in the right way won't have anywhere near the kind of economical impact as you imply here.
#3665
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 13,212
From: San Francisco











you're going to get called on it.
#3667
And that is why (as touched on by Zargof), if you look at my posts, or walls of text as they tend to go with subjects like this, you'll realise why Bernie tweeted what he did. Just too much to cover. I have a scientific inclination and I can barely touch on all the important points.
#3668
There are conservative Republicans who don't deny climate change either. This is a scientific issue anyway, first and foremost. Is the scientific community more left leaning? I don't know, but perhaps a slight lean to the left is desired in a community who is essentially working towards the betterment of mankind.
#3669
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 13,212
From: San Francisco











As it's the scientific consensus, I would expect a high percentage are, just as is the case for right-of-centre politicians in all western countries except the US.
#3670
And that is why (as touched on by Zargof), if you look at my posts, or walls of text as they tend to go with subjects like this, you'll realise why Bernie tweeted what he did. Just too much to cover. I have a scientific inclination and I can barely touch on all the important points.
If you look at the video, which I did afterwards, Bernie did as I expect expand on that. As usual Flavor Flav is tilting at windmills.
#3671
No, you misunderstand, Bernie didn't tweet that, someone else did as a summary of what Bernie said (it's a tweet after all).
If you look at the video, which I did afterwards, Bernie did as I expect expand on that. As usual FlavaFlav is tilting at windmills.
If you look at the video, which I did afterwards, Bernie did as I expect expand on that. As usual FlavaFlav is tilting at windmills.
But the essence was the same - you have to keep a tweet short because there is just too much to go into as to why that person was wrong.
#3672
Bloody Yank









Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,186
From: USA! USA!











Your political universe is built upon misrepresentations and strawman arguments. Even basic facts seems to elude you. There isn't a political debate here, just the uninformed and misinformed cliche-spewing sheep who fancy themselves as being "conservative thinkers" (which appears at this point to be an oxymoron.)
#3673
No, you misunderstand, Bernie didn't tweet that, someone else did as a summary of what Bernie said (it's a tweet after all).
If you look at the video, which I did afterwards, Bernie did as I expect expand on that. As usual Flavor Flav is tilting at windmills.
If you look at the video, which I did afterwards, Bernie did as I expect expand on that. As usual Flavor Flav is tilting at windmills.
Bernie gave the best explanation he could to the kid's question, but it would have been better for him to have avoided the usual arrogant - 'you're wrong' which needlessly embarrassed the kid in front of his schoolmates.
#3674
Surrounding the word "consensus" with quote marks in order to suggest that there is no consensus among those with the brain capacity to make informed judgments is an indication that you are worthy of the "stupid" label.
Your political universe is built upon misrepresentations and strawman arguments. Even basic facts seems to elude you. There isn't a political debate here, just the uninformed and misinformed cliche-spewing sheep who fancy themselves as being "conservative thinkers" (which appears at this point to be an oxymoron.)
Your political universe is built upon misrepresentations and strawman arguments. Even basic facts seems to elude you. There isn't a political debate here, just the uninformed and misinformed cliche-spewing sheep who fancy themselves as being "conservative thinkers" (which appears at this point to be an oxymoron.)
#3675
I agree with the Sultan on this. It would have been better for the poster to have included the video - if available - with the tweet, which was misleading.
Bernie gave the best explanation he could to the kid's question, but it would have been better for him to have avoided the usual arrogant - 'you're wrong' which needlessly embarrassed the kid in front of his schoolmates.
Bernie gave the best explanation he could to the kid's question, but it would have been better for him to have avoided the usual arrogant - 'you're wrong' which needlessly embarrassed the kid in front of his schoolmates.
You should start a campaign to ensure that every politician treats everyone they talk to or about as the special snowflakes they are.



