|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by username.exe
(Post 11654057)
Interesting that eEven the Fox polls have almost all of the GOP candidates losing to Clinton. :thumbup:
Obama and his people thoroughly dislike Hillary and I wouldn't be surprised to see them start quietly leaking her emails and other damaging stuff to the NYT that will wound her even before the primary season begins. Watch for Warren and a Dark Horse Yet to be Named who will make that race fun to watch. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by username.exe
(Post 11654057)
Interesting that eEven the Fox polls have almost all of the GOP candidates losing to Clinton. :thumbup:
|
Re: 2016 Election
I mainly watch CNN, and Aljazera?
Be nice to have a good news source. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Boiler
(Post 11654098)
I mainly watch CNN, and Aljazera?
Be nice to have a good news source. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Mrs Danvers
(Post 11654095)
Fox News was invented to scare nasty old white men with money. It works. You can see it's already scared the shit out of Boiler.
|
Re: 2016 Election
It's why I mostly listen to Party FM now in the car versus NPR. And really, do we see this election as anything that will really change the course of the direction the USA is going in?
Hillary or Marco Rubio? The only true change of course would be a candidate that isn't owned by business interests. If such a candidate was elected, they would soon be owned by business interests. I fail to see what the fuss is about. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Mrs Danvers
(Post 11654100)
Ha ha! You should really ditch cable altogether. How's the snow up there?
Bit last night, nearly melted out today. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Mrs Danvers
(Post 11654106)
Hillary or Marco Rubio? The only true change of course would be a candidate that isn't owned by business interests. If such a candidate was elected, they would soon be owned by business interests. I fail to see what the fuss is about. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Mrs Danvers
(Post 11654106)
Hillary or Marco Rubio? The only true change of course would be a candidate that isn't owned by business interests. If such a candidate was elected, they would soon be owned by business interests. I fail to see what the fuss is about.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by FlaviusAetius
(Post 11650003)
The ring may need to expand further: George Pataki, former Governor of New York, has been making sounds about sounding out the possibility of a run for President. One is reminded of lemmings.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11659452)
aaaand Pataki makes it official.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Give it two more months and the number of GOP runners will be in the triple digits.
|
Re: 2016 Election
I am thinking of having a go
|
Re: 2016 Election
As quickly as the GOP field has grown, I suspect it will shrink just as quickly...
Mike Huckabee Joked He Wished He Had Pretended to Be Transgender |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11663802)
As quickly as the GOP field has grown, I suspect it will shrink just as quickly...
Mike Huckabee Joked He Wished He Had Pretended to Be Transgender From a practical standpoint, surely his hypothetical 'daughter-meets-tranny-in-the-bathroom' situation is no different to the fact that I have to take my daughter into the gents' when we're out shopping because she can't wipe her own arse yet? In there, there are blokes pissing against the wall, for crying out loud ... |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 9:07 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.