![]() |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Giantaxe
(Post 11796688)
Another one bites the dust: Jindal "suspends" campaign. Now he can concentrate fully on ensuring that poorer Louisianans don't have access to healthcare.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Carson's own camp basically saying he is thick. So I assume his numbers will go up now?
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/18/us...isers-say.html |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11796831)
Carson's own camp basically saying he is thick. So I assume his numbers will go up now?
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/18/us...isers-say.html |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by username.exe
(Post 11796852)
I guess claiming to have attempted murder just didn't have the impact they were hoping for.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11797172)
Attempted murder just shows he'll be tough on crime, or something.
|
Re: 2016 Election
Could someone explain to me what Rand Paul is proposing regarding ESTA and the Visa Waiver in the wake of the Paris attacks?
I really don't understand when articles say: "Paul's bill would also institute a 30-day waiting period for citizens of so-called visa waiver countries" Should I post in another section, or can you answer me? |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by Ricky_85
(Post 11797305)
Could someone explain to me what Rand Paul is proposing regarding ESTA and the Visa Waiver in the wake of the Paris attacks?
I really don't understand when articles say: "Paul's bill would also institute a 30-day waiting period for citizens of so-called visa waiver countries" Should I post in another section, or can you answer me? Though it is weird that suddenly they are all in favor of immigration reform. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11797307)
No idea, do you have a link with actual details.
Though it is weird that suddenly they are all in favor of immigration reform. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by sir_eccles
(Post 11796831)
Carson's own camp basically saying he is thick. So I assume his numbers will go up now?
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/18/us...isers-say.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ace/?tid=sm_fb |
Re: 2016 Election
Polls, gotta love them, they are so accurate. Just been called by a robot that informed me that since I am a responsible VOTING (!!!) citizen (??) I have been selected blah, blah.....so, I am >75 yrs old Black man living in a house worth more than $100k who would vote for Donald Trump and the most important issue is school lunches. YES!!
|
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by RoadWarriorFromLP
(Post 11797173)
"I used to be black, but I've changed!"
|
Re: 2016 Election
So Trump's latest idea is that Muslims should have some sort of special identification so we know who they are. Hmm... that sounds vaguely familiar.
“We’re going to have to do things that we never did before. And some people are going to be upset about it, but I think that now everybody is feeling that security is going to rule,†Trump said. “And certain things will be done that we never thought would happen in this country in terms of information and learning about the enemy. And so we’re going to have to do certain things that were frankly unthinkable a year ago.†Yahoo News asked Trump whether this level of tracking might require registering Muslims in a database or giving them a form of special identification that noted their religion. He wouldn’t rule it out. “We’re going to have to — we’re going to have to look at a lot of things very closely,†Trump said when presented with the idea. “We’re going to have to look at the mosques. We’re going to have to look very, very carefully.†https://www.yahoo.com/politics/donal...537878070.html Anyway, if he wants to start looking very closely perhaps he could start with the First Amendment. The help him find it, it's right before the Second Amendment. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11797472)
Not only is he struggling with foreign policy, he's also struggling with American geography.
Let's be fair, though. It's not as if Carson drew the map himself. It's obvious that some staffer screwed up; there are so many gaffes coming from Carson himself that there's no need to fault him for something that he didn't do. |
Re: 2016 Election
Originally Posted by zargof
(Post 11798007)
So Trump's latest idea is that Muslims should have some sort of special identification so we know who they are. Hmm... that sounds vaguely familiar.
“We’re going to have to do things that we never did before. And some people are going to be upset about it, but I think that now everybody is feeling that security is going to rule,†Trump said. “And certain things will be done that we never thought would happen in this country in terms of information and learning about the enemy. And so we’re going to have to do certain things that were frankly unthinkable a year ago.†Yahoo News asked Trump whether this level of tracking might require registering Muslims in a database or giving them a form of special identification that noted their religion. He wouldn’t rule it out. “We’re going to have to — we’re going to have to look at a lot of things very closely,†Trump said when presented with the idea. “We’re going to have to look at the mosques. We’re going to have to look very, very carefully.†https://www.yahoo.com/politics/donal...537878070.html Anyway, if he wants to start looking very closely perhaps he could start with the First Amendment. The help him find it, it's right before the Second Amendment. |
Re: 2016 Election
Rejecting refugees of a particular religion; requiring those of a particular religion to have special identification. Hmmm I'm sure that happened last century. How did it work out?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:17 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.