A "Little Ironporer" on the way
#1
A "Little Ironporer" on the way
When Cathy got here 6 weeks ago, we decided that at our ages (42/39) the pill and other maeans were not what we wanted.... and left it in God's hands. I really did not expect His answer so soon, but He did- and the baby is due May 5, 2004, and we are both estatic!!
Mathematically (according to the rhythem system), it almost had to be the day she arrived, or the next.
Mathematically (according to the rhythem system), it almost had to be the day she arrived, or the next.
#2
Wales is next to England
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: New Jersey (but part of Wales came with me)
Posts: 425
Re: A "Little Ironporer" on the way
Originally posted by ironporer
When Cathy got here 6 weeks ago, we decided that at our ages (42/39) the pill and other maeans were not what we wanted.... and left it in God's hands. I really did not expect His answer so soon, but He did- and the baby is due May 5, 2004, and we are both estatic!!
Mathematically (according to the rhythem system), it almost had to be the day she arrived, or the next.
When Cathy got here 6 weeks ago, we decided that at our ages (42/39) the pill and other maeans were not what we wanted.... and left it in God's hands. I really did not expect His answer so soon, but He did- and the baby is due May 5, 2004, and we are both estatic!!
Mathematically (according to the rhythem system), it almost had to be the day she arrived, or the next.
Congratulations
John and Cindy
#3
#4
Congrats to both of you, dude. We're personally a little younger (25/29), so we're aiming for much later down the beaten path
#8
Re: A "Little Ironporer" on the way
Originally posted by ironporer
When Cathy got here 6 weeks ago, we decided that at our ages (42/39) the pill and other maeans were not what we wanted.... and left it in God's hands. I really did not expect His answer so soon, but He did- and the baby is due May 5, 2004, and we are both estatic!!
Mathematically (according to the rhythem system), it almost had to be the day she arrived, or the next.
When Cathy got here 6 weeks ago, we decided that at our ages (42/39) the pill and other maeans were not what we wanted.... and left it in God's hands. I really did not expect His answer so soon, but He did- and the baby is due May 5, 2004, and we are both estatic!!
Mathematically (according to the rhythem system), it almost had to be the day she arrived, or the next.
Doing this in reverse for your projected birthdate, that would make the date of conception, August 29. A very memorable Labor Day weekend ;-)
Congratulations to you and Cathy.
Rete
#9
Re: A "Little Ironporer" on the way
Originally posted by Rete
The older method of determining the pending birthdate of a child was to take the last menstral cycle, add 7 and then subtract three months.
Doing this in reverse for your projected birthdate, that would make the date of conception, August 29. A very memorable Labor Day weekend ;-)
Congratulations to you and Cathy.
Rete
The older method of determining the pending birthdate of a child was to take the last menstral cycle, add 7 and then subtract three months.
Doing this in reverse for your projected birthdate, that would make the date of conception, August 29. A very memorable Labor Day weekend ;-)
Congratulations to you and Cathy.
Rete
She has a doctor's appt. this week, so I guess we'll see what they say.
#12
wooooo
Hey there John!!!
I am so happy for you guys!! You are gonna be a daddy!!! That is certainly a VERY good new!!, Thanks for sharing!!
Get on yahoo more oftenly.. I don't ever get to talk to you guys anymore!!. Tell Cathy Hola de parte de la navarrica!! lol
Take care!
I am so happy for you guys!! You are gonna be a daddy!!! That is certainly a VERY good new!!, Thanks for sharing!!
Get on yahoo more oftenly.. I don't ever get to talk to you guys anymore!!. Tell Cathy Hola de parte de la navarrica!! lol
Take care!
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A "Little Ironporer" on the way
what are you going to name the baby? hopefully not "k-1" lol
"ironporer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> When Cathy got here 6 weeks ago, we decided that at our ages (42/39) the
> pill and other maeans were not what we wanted.... and left it in God's
> hands. I really did not expect His answer so soon, but He did- and the
> baby is due May 5, 2004, and we are both estatic!!
> Mathematically (according to the rhythem system), it almost had to be
> the day she arrived, or the next.
> --
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
"ironporer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> When Cathy got here 6 weeks ago, we decided that at our ages (42/39) the
> pill and other maeans were not what we wanted.... and left it in God's
> hands. I really did not expect His answer so soon, but He did- and the
> baby is due May 5, 2004, and we are both estatic!!
> Mathematically (according to the rhythem system), it almost had to be
> the day she arrived, or the next.
> --
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
#14
Re: A "Little Ironporer" on the way
Originally posted by ironporer
When Cathy got here 6 weeks ago, we decided that at our ages (42/39) the pill and other maeans were not what we wanted.... and left it in God's hands. I really did not expect His answer so soon, but He did- and the baby is due May 5, 2004, and we are both estatic!!
Mathematically (according to the rhythem system), it almost had to be the day she arrived, or the next.
When Cathy got here 6 weeks ago, we decided that at our ages (42/39) the pill and other maeans were not what we wanted.... and left it in God's hands. I really did not expect His answer so soon, but He did- and the baby is due May 5, 2004, and we are both estatic!!
Mathematically (according to the rhythem system), it almost had to be the day she arrived, or the next.
Congratulations. That's wonderful news.
#15
Wonderful news all around. Just the kind of thing I needed to hear today
Congrats, and take good care of yourselves. Oh, and sleep while you still can...
Elly
Congrats, and take good care of yourselves. Oh, and sleep while you still can...
Elly