Wikiposts

Two down.

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 11th 2011 | 12:09 am
  #1  
bil
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz
bil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond repute
Default Two down.

Yet another bent MP found guilty.

Amusingly, if he gets a sentance of less than 12 months, he is technically allowed to remain as an MP.
 
Old Jan 11th 2011 | 3:14 am
  #2  
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,590
anonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Two down.

Changed his plea to Guilty I see, hoping for a lighter sentence perhaps?

Nowt but a Common thief
 
Old Jan 11th 2011 | 3:17 am
  #3  
Fred James's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,231
From: Granada Costa
Fred James has a reputation beyond reputeFred James has a reputation beyond reputeFred James has a reputation beyond reputeFred James has a reputation beyond reputeFred James has a reputation beyond reputeFred James has a reputation beyond reputeFred James has a reputation beyond reputeFred James has a reputation beyond reputeFred James has a reputation beyond reputeFred James has a reputation beyond reputeFred James has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Two down.

Don't you mean a Commons thief.
 
Old Jan 11th 2011 | 3:24 am
  #4  
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,590
anonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond reputeanonimouse has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Two down.

Originally Posted by Fred James
Don't you mean a Commons thief.
yes I do
 
Old Jan 11th 2011 | 5:07 am
  #5  
bil
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz
bil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Two down.

It's a good result, and maybe the others who are currently pleading not guilty will reconsider.

The rest of the pack of chiselling graspers can consider themselves damn lucky. All the rest of the BTMPs (benefit thieving MPs) were dealt with internally with the worst getting a verbal slap on the wrist and simply having to pay the money back.

Can you imagine if all the people on this board were fiddling their taxes to the tune of anything between 20K and 200 pounds, we were rumbled, and we said to the tax office, "Here, we'll throw half a dozen of them to the wolves, some of us will pay it back, and the rest will promise not to get caught again."

(Sorry, the last bit should have read promise not to do it again.)
 
Old Jan 13th 2011 | 1:18 am
  #6  
Rotor's Avatar
BE Forum Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,178
Rotor has a reputation beyond reputeRotor has a reputation beyond reputeRotor has a reputation beyond reputeRotor has a reputation beyond reputeRotor has a reputation beyond reputeRotor has a reputation beyond reputeRotor has a reputation beyond reputeRotor has a reputation beyond reputeRotor has a reputation beyond reputeRotor has a reputation beyond reputeRotor has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Two down.

I`d really like to see tha tax evading arogant bitch Hazel Blears do time! She really thinks just by handing over a cheque it makes everything okay! If I tried it I`d be behind bars right away.
 
Old Jan 13th 2011 | 2:53 am
  #7  
bil
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz
bil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Two down.

Originally Posted by Rotor
I`d really like to see tha tax evading arogant bitch Hazel Blears do time! She really thinks just by handing over a cheque it makes everything okay! If I tried it I`d be behind bars right away.
I'd have 'em all up for fraud including Brown and Cameron.
 
Old Jan 13th 2011 | 9:12 pm
  #8  
Ex Expat
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,140
From: West Midlands, ex Granada province
scampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Two down.

Originally Posted by bil
I'd have 'em all up for fraud including Brown and Cameron.
But apparently most of them did not commit fraud in the legal sense and therefore cannot be charged with anything.

The legal system would be nearly as corrupt as some other countries if we could arrest, charge and send people to prison just because we did not like what they did, albeit not illegal.
 
Old Jan 13th 2011 | 11:18 pm
  #9  
bil
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz
bil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Two down.

Originally Posted by scampicat
But apparently most of them did not commit fraud in the legal sense and therefore cannot be charged with anything.

The legal system would be nearly as corrupt as some other countries if we could arrest, charge and send people to prison just because we did not like what they did, albeit not illegal.
Quite right. We must just hope that a) they take out every single one that is guilty of breaking the law, and b) at the next elections they will remember which ones were taking the piss and deal with them accordingly.

As if. Far too many vested interests, I'm afraid.

I know it's not a crime to take the piss and siphon out stuff to which you are not morally entitled, but at least it does serve to remind us all that the vast body politic is formed from people who are morally if not legally corrupt.
 
Old Jan 14th 2011 | 1:12 am
  #10  
Ex Expat
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,140
From: West Midlands, ex Granada province
scampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond reputescampicat has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Two down.

Originally Posted by bil
Quite right. We must just hope that a) they take out every single one that is guilty of breaking the law, and b) at the next elections they will remember which ones were taking the piss and deal with them accordingly.

As if. Far too many vested interests, I'm afraid.

I know it's not a crime to take the piss and siphon out stuff to which you are not morally entitled, but at least it does serve to remind us all that the vast body politic is formed from people who are morally if not legally corrupt.
Yes, agreed, and I for one would not have voted for the likes of Hazel Blears (who, if I'm not mistaken retained her seat in the GE).
 
Old Jan 14th 2011 | 4:17 am
  #11  
bil
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz
bil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Two down.

Originally Posted by scampicat
Yes, agreed, and I for one would not have voted for the likes of Hazel Blears (who, if I'm not mistaken retained her seat in the GE).
That bitch? Words fail me.
 
Old Jan 18th 2011 | 8:58 am
  #12  
steviedeluxe's Avatar
Not Banned (yet)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,404
From: East Sussex
steviedeluxe has a reputation beyond reputesteviedeluxe has a reputation beyond reputesteviedeluxe has a reputation beyond reputesteviedeluxe has a reputation beyond reputesteviedeluxe has a reputation beyond reputesteviedeluxe has a reputation beyond reputesteviedeluxe has a reputation beyond reputesteviedeluxe has a reputation beyond reputesteviedeluxe has a reputation beyond reputesteviedeluxe has a reputation beyond reputesteviedeluxe has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Two down.

This case is looking "interesting"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12219365

A relative of a peer standing trial over his expenses has said he was shocked to learn his address had been used on claim forms.

Lord Taylor of Warwick denies false accounting charges relating to expenses for peers who lived outside London.

His half-nephew, Robert Taylor, told the trial he was "quite angry" to hear his Oxford home had been cited on forms submitted by Lord Taylor.

The prosecution says the peer lived in London and never visited the property.

Former Tory peer Lord Taylor, 58, denies six charges of false accounting, over expenses claims amounting to £11,277 made in 2006 and 2007.
 
Old Jan 18th 2011 | 11:53 am
  #13  
bil
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz
bil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond reputebil has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Two down.

Originally Posted by steviedeluxe
This case is looking "interesting"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12219365
A ******* lord, and he has to screw that out of us?
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.