Prescriptions
#31
Originally Posted by jdr
I cant see them doing that, it would cost them a fortune in credits, be nice though 

#32
Forum Regular



Joined: May 2006
Posts: 192
From: denia











Originally Posted by jjh
We're not over 60 so I don't know whether they are free for the over 60's but you first need to sign with the equivalent of an NHS Doctor. You can check that when you sign. Prescription medicines are very cheap though. Prior to signing with a Doctor my husband's blood pressure tablets cost almost 20 Euros a month. Now he gets two months for a little over 3 Euros. It has to be worth it.
Good luck.
Good luck.
paris
#33
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,426
From: Velez-Malaga











I saw articles in the British press a few weeks ago about the proposal to reduce the number of years needed to 'earn' a full state pension to 30 years (for both men and women). I'll be delighted if it comes to pass as I've already got more than 30 years in, but can't understand how it will be affordable when the government has been telling us for years that we'll all have to work until we're 70 at least to be able to afford to retire.
#34
Originally Posted by Lynn R
I saw articles in the British press a few weeks ago about the proposal to reduce the number of years needed to 'earn' a full state pension to 30 years (for both men and women). I'll be delighted if it comes to pass as I've already got more than 30 years in, but can't understand how it will be affordable when the government has been telling us for years that we'll all have to work until we're 70 at least to be able to afford to retire.
If their pensions were not adjusted upwards to reflect the 30 year rule there would be riots!
#35
Hi LynnR & Fred,
I bet the same article also said that the state pension age for men & women is to be equalised at 67. This will take place over a number of years in stages ending I think in 2020.
The equalisation also includes the proposal to reduce the number of qualifying years but that does not start until 2012 and I have not seen anywhere that it will be retrospective.
Fred my wife is one of those who gets reduced state pension because we did not react to some changes made in 1977 when she was out of the job market and we did not find out about. We appealed all the way to the commissioners but to no avail. I think if we went to Europe on Human Rights grounds we would win and it would benefit lots of others who lost out when "Home Responsibility Allowance" was introduced. However we have other things to occupy us at the moment but someone perhaps backed by say Age Concern should fight it all the way it would make a big difference for some.
Regards,
John.
I bet the same article also said that the state pension age for men & women is to be equalised at 67. This will take place over a number of years in stages ending I think in 2020.
The equalisation also includes the proposal to reduce the number of qualifying years but that does not start until 2012 and I have not seen anywhere that it will be retrospective.
Fred my wife is one of those who gets reduced state pension because we did not react to some changes made in 1977 when she was out of the job market and we did not find out about. We appealed all the way to the commissioners but to no avail. I think if we went to Europe on Human Rights grounds we would win and it would benefit lots of others who lost out when "Home Responsibility Allowance" was introduced. However we have other things to occupy us at the moment but someone perhaps backed by say Age Concern should fight it all the way it would make a big difference for some.
Regards,
John.
Originally Posted by Lynn R
I saw articles in the British press a few weeks ago about the proposal to reduce the number of years needed to 'earn' a full state pension to 30 years (for both men and women). I'll be delighted if it comes to pass as I've already got more than 30 years in, but can't understand how it will be affordable when the government has been telling us for years that we'll all have to work until we're 70 at least to be able to afford to retire.
#36
Hi Again,
Had a dig round on the DWP website and found this quote;
Edit because of copyright.... please only post a link to the artical
There is also a very informative graph which shows that only 20% of women retiring in 2005 will draw a full state pension.
It does not seem to indicate to me that it will help those already in receipt of a pension.
Regards,
John
Had a dig round on the DWP website and found this quote;
Edit because of copyright.... please only post a link to the artical
There is also a very informative graph which shows that only 20% of women retiring in 2005 will draw a full state pension.
It does not seem to indicate to me that it will help those already in receipt of a pension.
Regards,
John
Originally Posted by John & Kath
Hi LynnR & Fred,
The equalisation also includes the proposal to reduce the number of qualifying years but that does not start until 2012 and I have not seen anywhere that it will be retrospective.
The equalisation also includes the proposal to reduce the number of qualifying years but that does not start until 2012 and I have not seen anywhere that it will be retrospective.
Last edited by jdr; Aug 14th 2006 at 1:51 am. Reason: Copyright
#37
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,426
From: Velez-Malaga











Yes John you are right, the article did refer to the state pension age being equalised at 67 by 2020.
But if the 30 year qualification rule is fully implemented by 2012, I will still get my full state pension in 2016 when I am 65, even if I stop paying NI contributions this year at age 50 which I hope to do.
Won't it be nice to come out on the right side of one of these changes for once - I only just missed out on being able to claim my state pension at 60.
But if the 30 year qualification rule is fully implemented by 2012, I will still get my full state pension in 2016 when I am 65, even if I stop paying NI contributions this year at age 50 which I hope to do.
Won't it be nice to come out on the right side of one of these changes for once - I only just missed out on being able to claim my state pension at 60.
#38
Originally Posted by paris hilton
Hi i saw your post and wonder what the tablets were your husband has as i am on atenanol 50mg,can these be got over in spain easily and if so what are the cost per packet of 28 or 56.
paris
paris
#39
BE Forum Addict








Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,327
From: Chiclana











Originally Posted by Lynn R
Yes John you are right, the article did refer to the state pension age being equalised at 67 by 2020.
But if the 30 year qualification rule is fully implemented by 2012, I will still get my full state pension in 2016 when I am 65, even if I stop paying NI contributions this year at age 50 which I hope to do.
Won't it be nice to come out on the right side of one of these changes for once - I only just missed out on being able to claim my state pension at 60.
But if the 30 year qualification rule is fully implemented by 2012, I will still get my full state pension in 2016 when I am 65, even if I stop paying NI contributions this year at age 50 which I hope to do.
Won't it be nice to come out on the right side of one of these changes for once - I only just missed out on being able to claim my state pension at 60.
#40
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,426
From: Velez-Malaga











Thanks Glynis, but as I was born in 1956 that's why I have to wait until I'm 65 - I come just outside the phased arrangements. One of the few occasions when I wish I was older than I am!
#41
Forum Regular



Joined: May 2006
Posts: 192
From: denia











Originally Posted by Mitzyboy
I was speaking to the Dept of Work and Pensions today because I've given up work to live in Spain. I was going to make voluntary NI contributions because I'm short of the 40 odd years I need to make the full state pension.
She told me that there is a proposal going through at the moment to reduce the amount of years you need to put in to 30 years!!! Although I found this quite strange, she advised me not to make any contributions until early next year, because if I make them now I won't be able to claim them back if the 30 year thing goes through. She did reiterate that its only a proposal at the moment, but just a warning for those considering it or already doing it ... maybe speak to them yourselves on 0044 (0) 191 218 1999
She told me that there is a proposal going through at the moment to reduce the amount of years you need to put in to 30 years!!! Although I found this quite strange, she advised me not to make any contributions until early next year, because if I make them now I won't be able to claim them back if the 30 year thing goes through. She did reiterate that its only a proposal at the moment, but just a warning for those considering it or already doing it ... maybe speak to them yourselves on 0044 (0) 191 218 1999
paris
paris




