|
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 11303442)
Jeez there ought to be a law against posting such huge piccies.:sneaky:
We find that the teckies have carried out a planned maintenance visit, buggered it all up, left us with a super slow website - and yet they still allow piccies of that size. no justice in life :( All the things you are and aren't allowed to do, and yet this is still allowed ! |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by jennieJ
(Post 11303551)
+1
All the things you are and aren't allowed to do, and yet this is still allowed ! :thumbdown: ` |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 11303885)
too right on that, and I am starting to take it personally
:thumbdown: ` Aside from that, you all do realise that the limit on image size is based on the file size, not the amount of pixels along each edge, right? Annoying as it is when it reformats the whole page, it really isn't anything that the tech team are going to waste their time over. |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 11303442)
Jeez there ought to be a law against posting such huge piccies.:sneaky:
We find that the teckies have carried out a planned maintenance visit, buggered it all up, left us with a super slow website - and yet they still allow piccies of that size. no justice in life :(
Originally Posted by jennieJ
(Post 11303551)
+1
All the things you are and aren't allowed to do, and yet this is still allowed !
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 11303885)
too right on that, and I am starting to take it personally
:thumbdown: ` If it grossly offends you do please email admin to ask them to remove it.:blink: You might get sucked into the anomaly though. Just saying... |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11303889)
Of course, because that makes perfect sense :blink:
Aside from that, you all do realise that the limit on image size is based on the file size, not the amount of pixels along each edge, right? Annoying as it is when it reformats the whole page, it really isn't anything that the tech team are going to waste their time over. but that is the IT ethos. ` |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 11303907)
well considering the mess they have made of the planned maintenance and associated upgrades perhaps they should be doing what the client wants rather than doing what they want.
but that is the IT ethos. ` Outside the Anomaly. |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 11303906)
Good grief people. The pic just came out a bit larger than I expected. Nobody "allowed" anything either way.
If it grossly offends you do please email admin to ask them to remove it.:blink: You might get sucked into the anomaly though. Just saying... |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 11303906)
Good grief people. The pic just came out a bit larger than I expected. Nobody "allowed" anything either way.
If it grossly offends you do please email admin to ask them to remove it.:blink: You might get sucked into the anomaly though. Just saying... |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 11303907)
well considering the mess they have made of the planned maintenance and associated upgrades perhaps they should be doing what the client wants rather than doing what they want.
but that is the IT ethos. ` |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 11303913)
just expressing a viewpoint as I understand I am still allowed that little luxury, so no need to get so defensive
|
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Jerseygirl
(Post 11303912)
I've asked the techs if they can block people posting large pics because it reduces the rest of the thread. It will also use a lot of data. It may take a while for them to get round to it...what with all the problems with the recent upgrade.
It didn't look that large on the site I grabbed it from, honest guv. I don't think it is a large file actually since it's just a screen grab so it won't suck up too much power, it's just in a large format. |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 11303921)
Thank you.
It didn't look that large on the site I grabbed it from, honest guv. I don't think it is a large few actually since it's just a screen grab so it won't suck up too much power, it's just in a large formay. It won't be a large file size, probably just a few megs, it's the pixels that determine the physical size of the image on screen. Bit of a non issue really, unless your internet is really shit, I suppose. Like 1995 dial-up shit. |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by SultanOfSwing
(Post 11303927)
You never know what size a pic will post at until it is posted, unless you preview the post before submitting.
It won't be a large file size, probably just a few megs, it's the pixels that determine the physical size of the image on screen. Bit of a non issue really, unless your internet is really shit, I suppose. Like 1995 dial-up shit. |
Re: PDT v TIO
Originally Posted by Lion in Winter
(Post 11303932)
Well anyway, it seems it will be taken care of soon so we can go back to discussing actual crimes against humanity and stuff. :)
|
Re: PDT v TIO
I think it should be left there, just 'cause.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 8:56 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.