Meet up!
#286
I haven't seen him personally cos he wasn't there......but he's got all the dates and numbers.
#287
Straw Man.










Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 46,302
From: That, there, that's not my post count... nothing to see here, move along.











#290
Straw Man.










Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 46,302
From: That, there, that's not my post count... nothing to see here, move along.











#291
I do understand the Mods position on stopping advertising.....and I'm not trying to break the rules.
The situation is this: If I put up a film of Dylan or something like that, it's my film and my content.
However....when I put up a vid of a cave walkthrough or a cave being built, it's because a client has employed me to take it. If I post it up anywhere WITHOUT the copyright then any other agent can plagarise it for their purposes. And they will do it at the first opportunity!
So I cannot risk what essentially is a client's property being posted on the Net without their branding on it. It's not me trying to flaunt the rules.....it's just that I have a duty of care to the respective client.
So as you see, we have a Catch 22 here.
The situation is this: If I put up a film of Dylan or something like that, it's my film and my content.
However....when I put up a vid of a cave walkthrough or a cave being built, it's because a client has employed me to take it. If I post it up anywhere WITHOUT the copyright then any other agent can plagarise it for their purposes. And they will do it at the first opportunity!
So I cannot risk what essentially is a client's property being posted on the Net without their branding on it. It's not me trying to flaunt the rules.....it's just that I have a duty of care to the respective client.
So as you see, we have a Catch 22 here.
#292
Straw Man.










Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 46,302
From: That, there, that's not my post count... nothing to see here, move along.











I do understand the Mods position on stopping advertising.....and I'm not trying to break the rules.
The situation is this: If I put up a film of Dylan or something like that, it's my film and my content.
However....when I put up a vid of a cave walkthrough or a cave being built, it's because a client has employed me to take it. If I post it up anywhere WITHOUT the copyright then any other agent can plagarise it for their purposes. And they will do it at the first opportunity!
So I cannot risk what essentially is a client's property being posted on the Net without their branding on it. It's not me trying to flaunt the rules.....it's just that I have a duty of care to the respective client.
So as you see, we have a Catch 22 here.
The situation is this: If I put up a film of Dylan or something like that, it's my film and my content.
However....when I put up a vid of a cave walkthrough or a cave being built, it's because a client has employed me to take it. If I post it up anywhere WITHOUT the copyright then any other agent can plagarise it for their purposes. And they will do it at the first opportunity!
So I cannot risk what essentially is a client's property being posted on the Net without their branding on it. It's not me trying to flaunt the rules.....it's just that I have a duty of care to the respective client.
So as you see, we have a Catch 22 here.
#293
I do understand the Mods position on stopping advertising.....and I'm not trying to break the rules.
The situation is this: If I put up a film of Dylan or something like that, it's my film and my content.
However....when I put up a vid of a cave walkthrough or a cave being built, it's because a client has employed me to take it. If I post it up anywhere WITHOUT the copyright then any other agent can plagarise it for their purposes. And they will do it at the first opportunity!
So I cannot risk what essentially is a client's property being posted on the Net without their branding on it. It's not me trying to flaunt the rules.....it's just that I have a duty of care to the respective client.
So as you see, we have a Catch 22 here.
The situation is this: If I put up a film of Dylan or something like that, it's my film and my content.
However....when I put up a vid of a cave walkthrough or a cave being built, it's because a client has employed me to take it. If I post it up anywhere WITHOUT the copyright then any other agent can plagarise it for their purposes. And they will do it at the first opportunity!
So I cannot risk what essentially is a client's property being posted on the Net without their branding on it. It's not me trying to flaunt the rules.....it's just that I have a duty of care to the respective client.
So as you see, we have a Catch 22 here.
#294
I do understand the Mods position on stopping advertising.....and I'm not trying to break the rules.
The situation is this: If I put up a film of Dylan or something like that, it's my film and my content.
However....when I put up a vid of a cave walkthrough or a cave being built, it's because a client has employed me to take it. If I post it up anywhere WITHOUT the copyright then any other agent can plagarise it for their purposes. And they will do it at the first opportunity!
So I cannot risk what essentially is a client's property being posted on the Net without their branding on it. It's not me trying to flaunt the rules.....it's just that I have a duty of care to the respective client.
So as you see, we have a Catch 22 here.
The situation is this: If I put up a film of Dylan or something like that, it's my film and my content.
However....when I put up a vid of a cave walkthrough or a cave being built, it's because a client has employed me to take it. If I post it up anywhere WITHOUT the copyright then any other agent can plagarise it for their purposes. And they will do it at the first opportunity!
So I cannot risk what essentially is a client's property being posted on the Net without their branding on it. It's not me trying to flaunt the rules.....it's just that I have a duty of care to the respective client.
So as you see, we have a Catch 22 here.
#297
Straw Man.










Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 46,302
From: That, there, that's not my post count... nothing to see here, move along.











#299
No we'd have to ban that under the trades descriptions act as he's clearly no gentleman, and hes not Ginger very often either




