Illegal House.
#106
Straw Man.










Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 46,302
From: That, there, that's not my post count... nothing to see here, move along.











#107
Banned










Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz











You see, more incomplete English.
You should always leave them wanting more!!
I alas must be off to work now.
You should always leave them wanting more!!
I alas must be off to work now.
#108
Straw Man.










Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 46,302
From: That, there, that's not my post count... nothing to see here, move along.











#109
Banned










Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz











Very, but the art is in what you choose to see.
#110
Straw Man.










Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 46,302
From: That, there, that's not my post count... nothing to see here, move along.











#111
Banned










Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,653
From: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz











Think of it as less of a contradiction, and more of a leg pull.
#112
Thread Starter
Ex Expat







Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,140
From: West Midlands, ex Granada province











Well, our friends are still waiting for the court case, they have spent 1000s in lawyers' fees.
Turns out that the previous owners were being threatened with legal action because of it being an illegal dwelling in the January and in the April (without anything being resolved) they sold it to our friends.
I don't know how they can sleep at night. They have gone back to the UK and left no valid forwarding address.
The written translation has translated the word nave as dwelling or house. This was done by a bilingual employee of the estate agent. On the escritura it says nave. Our friends did not speak any Spanish at the time, the woman is now quite fluent.
They also have photographs taken from long before they were on the scene showing it being used as a dwelling, with the extensions and additions.
Their argument is, if it looks like a house, says it's a house in the translation and they were told (wrongly) it was a house by someone whose business it is to know, how were they to know otherwise?
What gets to me thought is that there are many other illegal dwellings in the same vicinity, some of them built and sold quite knowingly by an expat builder. The people who live in these properties, knowing they were illegal when they moved in, are not in trouble - one has even said that the illegal property which she knew was illegal from the beginning, is her pension!! Why are our friends who bought in good faith being made an example of but nothing happening to these people who knowingly bought or occupied? (I personally have a theory).
Anyway, suffice it to say, all is not quite lost yet for our friends but things still look very bleak.
Turns out that the previous owners were being threatened with legal action because of it being an illegal dwelling in the January and in the April (without anything being resolved) they sold it to our friends.
I don't know how they can sleep at night. They have gone back to the UK and left no valid forwarding address.The written translation has translated the word nave as dwelling or house. This was done by a bilingual employee of the estate agent. On the escritura it says nave. Our friends did not speak any Spanish at the time, the woman is now quite fluent.
They also have photographs taken from long before they were on the scene showing it being used as a dwelling, with the extensions and additions.
Their argument is, if it looks like a house, says it's a house in the translation and they were told (wrongly) it was a house by someone whose business it is to know, how were they to know otherwise?
What gets to me thought is that there are many other illegal dwellings in the same vicinity, some of them built and sold quite knowingly by an expat builder. The people who live in these properties, knowing they were illegal when they moved in, are not in trouble - one has even said that the illegal property which she knew was illegal from the beginning, is her pension!! Why are our friends who bought in good faith being made an example of but nothing happening to these people who knowingly bought or occupied? (I personally have a theory).
Anyway, suffice it to say, all is not quite lost yet for our friends but things still look very bleak.
Last edited by scampicat; Sep 18th 2008 at 4:06 pm.
#114
Banned






Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,380
From: inaskip











Well, our friends are still waiting for the court case, they have spent 1000s in lawyers' fees.
Turns out that the previous owners were being threatened with legal action because of it being an illegal dwelling in the January and in the April (without anything being resolved) they sold it to our friends.
I don't know how they can sleep at night. They have gone back to the UK and left no valid forwarding address.
The written translation has translated the word nave as dwelling or house. This was done by a bilingual employee of the estate agent. On the escritura it says nave. Our friends did not speak any Spanish at the time, the woman is now quite fluent.
They also have photographs taken from long before they were on the scene showing it being used as a dwelling, with the extensions and additions.
Their argument is, if it looks like a house, says it's a house in the translation and they were told (wrongly) it was a house by someone whose business it is to know, how were they to know otherwise?
What gets to me thought is that there are many other illegal dwellings in the same vicinity, some of them built and sold quite knowingly by an expat builder. The people who live in these properties, knowing they were illegal when they moved in, are not in trouble - one has even said that the illegal property which she knew was illegal from the beginning, is her pension!! Why are our friends who bought in good faith being made an example of but nothing happening to these people who knowingly bought or occupied? (I personally have a theory).
Anyway, suffice it to say, all is not quite lost yet for our friends but things still look very bleak.
Turns out that the previous owners were being threatened with legal action because of it being an illegal dwelling in the January and in the April (without anything being resolved) they sold it to our friends.
I don't know how they can sleep at night. They have gone back to the UK and left no valid forwarding address.The written translation has translated the word nave as dwelling or house. This was done by a bilingual employee of the estate agent. On the escritura it says nave. Our friends did not speak any Spanish at the time, the woman is now quite fluent.
They also have photographs taken from long before they were on the scene showing it being used as a dwelling, with the extensions and additions.
Their argument is, if it looks like a house, says it's a house in the translation and they were told (wrongly) it was a house by someone whose business it is to know, how were they to know otherwise?
What gets to me thought is that there are many other illegal dwellings in the same vicinity, some of them built and sold quite knowingly by an expat builder. The people who live in these properties, knowing they were illegal when they moved in, are not in trouble - one has even said that the illegal property which she knew was illegal from the beginning, is her pension!! Why are our friends who bought in good faith being made an example of but nothing happening to these people who knowingly bought or occupied? (I personally have a theory).
Anyway, suffice it to say, all is not quite lost yet for our friends but things still look very bleak.
#115
Thread Starter
Ex Expat







Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,140
From: West Midlands, ex Granada province











Yes, she did have a lawyer, but the paperwork does say that it is a nave. It is the translation which says it is a house or dwelling and this was done by an employee of the Estate Agent. Our friends did not speak any Spanish at the time, (at least one of them speaks fluently now).
No-one at any time told them they were not allowed to live in the property.
They are NOT a reputable estate agent, but how do you know that when all you are trying to do is buy a house off them? You might not find it out until afterwards. As far as they were concerned it was all legal and above board.
I get a bit fed up of people saying that it is there own fault. They did all they could to the best of their knowledge, it isn't their fault that the agent turned out to be a crook.
No-one at any time told them they were not allowed to live in the property.
They are NOT a reputable estate agent, but how do you know that when all you are trying to do is buy a house off them? You might not find it out until afterwards. As far as they were concerned it was all legal and above board.
I get a bit fed up of people saying that it is there own fault. They did all they could to the best of their knowledge, it isn't their fault that the agent turned out to be a crook.
Last edited by scampicat; Sep 19th 2008 at 1:58 pm.
#116
As our bettie would say...Best not worry yourself chuck...One hotpot coming up lovee 



Last edited by poshnbucks; May 29th 2009 at 5:39 pm.
#117
Banned






Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,380
From: inaskip











Yes, she did have a lawyer, but the paperwork does say that it is a nave. It is the translation which says it is a house or dwelling and this was done by an employee of the Estate Agent. Our friends did not speak any Spanish at the time, (at least one of them speaks fluently now).
No-one at any time told them they were not allowed to live in the property.
They are NOT a reputable estate agent, but how do you know that when all you are trying to do is buy a house off them? You might not find it out until afterwards. As far as they were concerned it was all legal and above board.
I get a bit fed up of people saying that it is there own fault. They did all they could to the best of their knowledge, it isn't their fault that the agent turned out to be a crook.
No-one at any time told them they were not allowed to live in the property.
They are NOT a reputable estate agent, but how do you know that when all you are trying to do is buy a house off them? You might not find it out until afterwards. As far as they were concerned it was all legal and above board.
I get a bit fed up of people saying that it is there own fault. They did all they could to the best of their knowledge, it isn't their fault that the agent turned out to be a crook.
Last edited by betris; Sep 20th 2008 at 7:25 am.
#118
Thread Starter
Ex Expat







Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,140
From: West Midlands, ex Granada province











Sorry if I misunderstood you betris, it's just that some people around here have been less than helpful.
Yes....you would have thought the lawyer would have noticed. If he did he didn't say anything, but that means nothing does it?
We know some people who when they bought a house were asked by the notary how much should be put on the deeds; were told by the lawyer where to hand over the black money (the bank manager's office); their lawyer had already said the deeds were OK when later it was found that they were not (luckily it is something that can be put right) - they thought this was just the way you buy a house in Spain - they didn't realise that both the abogado and the notario were corrupt.
Lots of it about .
Yes....you would have thought the lawyer would have noticed. If he did he didn't say anything, but that means nothing does it?
We know some people who when they bought a house were asked by the notary how much should be put on the deeds; were told by the lawyer where to hand over the black money (the bank manager's office); their lawyer had already said the deeds were OK when later it was found that they were not (luckily it is something that can be put right) - they thought this was just the way you buy a house in Spain - they didn't realise that both the abogado and the notario were corrupt.
Lots of it about .
#119
Banned






Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,380
From: inaskip











Sorry if I misunderstood you betris, it's just that some people around here have been less than helpful.
Yes....you would have thought the lawyer would have noticed. If he did he didn't say anything, but that means nothing does it?
We know some people who when they bought a house were asked by the notary how much should be put on the deeds; were told by the lawyer where to hand over the black money (the bank manager's office); their lawyer had already said the deeds were OK when later it was found that they were not (luckily it is something that can be put right) - they thought this was just the way you buy a house in Spain - they didn't realise that both the abogado and the notario were corrupt.
Lots of it about .
Yes....you would have thought the lawyer would have noticed. If he did he didn't say anything, but that means nothing does it?
We know some people who when they bought a house were asked by the notary how much should be put on the deeds; were told by the lawyer where to hand over the black money (the bank manager's office); their lawyer had already said the deeds were OK when later it was found that they were not (luckily it is something that can be put right) - they thought this was just the way you buy a house in Spain - they didn't realise that both the abogado and the notario were corrupt.
Lots of it about .
#120
I heard of a case last year where a UK couple agreed a price to sell their house incl. black money then went to the Notario and completed the paperwork with the buyer.
Notario then as usual, left the room and the couple asked the buyer for the cash.
The buyer replied ""What cash there is no cash,the house is now mine"" and he calmly walked out the door. Bye,bye!
Notario then as usual, left the room and the couple asked the buyer for the cash.
The buyer replied ""What cash there is no cash,the house is now mine"" and he calmly walked out the door. Bye,bye!




