![]() |
Re: Human Rights ?
Snce I read the story I've had the quote about Macduff in my head.
|
Re: Human Rights ?
Originally Posted by rachelk
(Post 11026691)
Whereas in the Uk we limit ourselves to ripping unborn children from the wombs of mentally ill foreign women, putting the babies into care and sending the women home without them.
so how many women and children and babies were involved in this :confused: although I am not too happy with this, the Social Workers didn't manage to save Baby Peter and several others who were supposedly in their care, why should they get involved with a foreign national :confused::( |
Re: Human Rights ?
Yes, agree, exaggeration of scale (I hope) but I don't think it's possible to exaggerate the horror for the poor woman, sectioned or not. Surely there must have been a more humane or compassionate way? Was it really out of the question to get her back home so that the baby could go into care there where she wouldn't feel so far away?
Edited to correct The programme Undercover care I saw referred to on another thread aired a few years ago but apparently some clpis were shown on BBC today. The programme exposes the abuses in the UK care system and is available online. |
Re: Human Rights ?
I am a fox, those damn humans deserve no rights, they have been chasing my lot
around for centuries.As for those damn dogs, gang rape comes in question, and For those righteous snobish horses, giving those humans piggy-back rides, to chase us down, make them into burgers, I say.:p:p |
Re: Human Rights ?
Originally Posted by rachelk
(Post 11028069)
Yes, agree, exaggeration of scale (I hope) but I don't think it's possible to exaggerate the horror for the poor woman, sectioned or not. Surely there must have been a more humane or compassionate way? Was it really out of the question to get her back home so that the baby could go into care there where she wouldn't feel so far away?
Father of caesarean scandal woman: Why I DON'T believe she should keep the baby The father of the Italian woman ordered by British judges to give up her baby after a forced caesarean has backed the court’s decision to put the child up for adoption. Marino Pacchieri said his daughter Alessandra is a ‘threat’ to the baby because she experiences ‘manic, paranoid delusions’. He added that his daughter, who suffers from bipolar disorder, frequently defies doctors by refusing to take her medication. ‘My worry is that if she is given custody and stops taking her medication again, as she has done countless times, she will become a threat to the child. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2n10rPTjN |
Re: Human Rights ?
Yes thanls, I saw the comments from the father a day or two ago, it doesn't change the horror I feel about what's been done to this woman.
I wasn't suggesting she be allowed to keep the baby, but that the baby could have gone for adoption in italy instead of in the UK, as I understand is the case. At least then she might be able to see it from time to time and it would have the chance to know its brother and sister. Has this changed? Are the UK social services going to pass the baby to the Italian authorities? |
Re: Human Rights ?
Originally Posted by rachelk
(Post 11028069)
Yes, agree, exaggeration of scale (I hope) but I don't think it's possible to exaggerate the horror for the poor woman, sectioned or not. Surely there must have been a more humane or compassionate way? Was it really out of the question to get her back home so that the baby could go into care there where she wouldn't feel so far away?
Edited to correct The programme Undercover care I saw referred to on another thread aired a few years ago but apparently some clpis were shown on BBC today. The programme exposes the abuses in the UK care system and is available online. |
Re: Human Rights ?
Originally Posted by Dick Dasterdly
(Post 11026611)
It appears to be run in a very similar biased and arse licking manner as the EU from what I gather.
For instance the Russians only agreed to become members and were readily accepted on condition that their own judges should take part in any judgements affecting their own country. Now what could be fairer and more unbiased than that I ask you ? :confused: Off course the situation in Russia is so perfect I'm sure they don't need them anyway. :cool: |
Re: Human Rights ?
I haven't watched the programme, the comments I read about it were distressing enough. Several of the perpertrators were, fortunately, jailed for the abuse of patients.
|
Re: Human Rights ?
Originally Posted by jackytoo
(Post 11028162)
I prefer to leave it to the experts.
|
Re: Human Rights ?
The person I refer to was given access to a specialist Lawyer and legal aid to appeal against her confinement. He is defending her despite her refusing to speak to him:confused: No-one can help her as she thinks everyone is trying to kill her, even her 2 young children.
|
Re: Human Rights ?
Originally Posted by rachelk
(Post 11026691)
Whereas in the Uk we limit ourselves to ripping unborn children from the wombs of mentally ill foreign women, putting the babies into care and sending the women home without them.
M |
Re: Human Rights ?
Originally Posted by Maybe1day
(Post 11229470)
Sounds like Spain a few years ago only they were sane and the babies were sold to wealthy families, check ongoing court cases....
M Very sad business, to which the Govt appears completely oblivious, though nothing new there, judging by some of their other recent actions. |
Re: Human Rights ?
Amnesty International:
http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/spain...law-2014-04-24 The excessive use of force by Spanish police and plans to strengthen repressive legislation are a damning indictment of the Spanish government’s determination to crush peaceful protest, said Amnesty International in a new report published today. “The Spanish government is using the full force of the law to suffocate legitimate peaceful protest,†said Jezerca Tigani, Europe and Central Asia Deputy Programme Director. “The police have repeatedly used batons and rubber bullets against demonstrators, injuring and maiming protestors and by-standers alike. The police act with complete impunity, while peaceful demonstrators and leaders of social movements are continually harassed, stigmatized, beaten, sometimes arrested to face criminal charges, imprisonment and fines.†http://www.amnesty.org/sites/impact...._in_Madrid.jpg I suppose some will dispute any of this is true also.....just like Telemadrid did when they used images of riots in Greece to portray false violence by the Spanish...... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibir-3Y9ALQ&hd=1 |
Re: Human Rights ?
Originally Posted by Madridboy
(Post 11233821)
Amnesty International:
http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/spain...law-2014-04-24 The excessive use of force by Spanish police and plans to strengthen repressive legislation are a damning indictment of the Spanish government’s determination to crush peaceful protest, said Amnesty International in a new report published today. “The Spanish government is using the full force of the law to suffocate legitimate peaceful protest,†said Jezerca Tigani, Europe and Central Asia Deputy Programme Director. More and more it appears that this Govt is heading back towards Francoism both with new repressive legislation and thuggery on the streets. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:33 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.