EMPLOYING A CLEANER
#1
Thread Starter
Forum Regular




Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 286
From: Malaga

The Agent running our block of flats wants to employ one of the people living in the block but I dont want to because when they did it before it was badly done. But surely for an Agent to suggest this is wrong because it would be cash in hand and therefore it cannot be legal! or is it!! what if there were an accident not to mention the poor standard of work. I would naturally prefer a proper cleaning company one of which is highly regarded.
#2
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,749











The Agent running our block of flats wants to employ one of the people living in the block but I dont want to because when they did it before it was badly done. But surely for an Agent to suggest this is wrong because it would be cash in hand and therefore it cannot be legal! or is it!! what if there were an accident not to mention the poor standard of work. I would naturally prefer a proper cleaning company one of which is highly regarded.
Cleaners who work for more than one client are meant to be autonomo so are responsible for paying their own social security payments
Of course, it would be illegal if there were no record of invoices
#3
Who ever employs the cleaner will also have to have third-party liability insurance!
#4
Thread Starter
Forum Regular




Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 286
From: Malaga

It's legal as long as the cleaner raises an invoice each month with teh IVA included - which is then paid by the community
Cleaners who work for more than one client are meant to be autonomo so are responsible for paying their own social security payments
Of course, it would be illegal if there were no record of invoices
Cleaners who work for more than one client are meant to be autonomo so are responsible for paying their own social security payments
Of course, it would be illegal if there were no record of invoices
#5
Thread Starter
Forum Regular




Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 286
From: Malaga


Exactly that is one of the reasons I am not keen and lots of other reasons. Difficult to get rid of someone who lives in the block if they dont come up to scratch and so far that is the case.
#6
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,749











Building communities are run by vote. The problem is that you could become very unpopular by voting against one of your neighbours who could need the work very badly. Not good when you have to live with these people
Also, an agency is likely to be twice as expensive
#8
Thread Starter
Forum Regular




Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 286
From: Malaga

It all depends whether your neighbours agree with you
Building communities are run by vote. The problem is that you could become very unpopular by voting against one of your neighbours who could need the work very badly. Not good when you have to live with these people
Also, an agency is likely to be twice as expensive
Building communities are run by vote. The problem is that you could become very unpopular by voting against one of your neighbours who could need the work very badly. Not good when you have to live with these people
Also, an agency is likely to be twice as expensive
#9
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,749











No no difference in price. It was voted in the meeting that we employ a cleaning company. Everyone needs work including the people working for the cleaning company, it is better to patronize that which is legal, because otherwise these companies can go bust taking their work force with them!
But anyway, something to discuss with the community. Good luck!
#10
Thinking outside the box!
Why don't you and others clean the area outside your own flat? This is what used to happen before we had agents ripping us off for sub-standard "services".
Why don't you and others clean the area outside your own flat? This is what used to happen before we had agents ripping us off for sub-standard "services".
#11
Thread Starter
Forum Regular




Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 286
From: Malaga

#12
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,749











Cleaners are cheap, use them!
#13
Banned










Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 19,367
From: Mallorca











We have considered cleaning people, but in the end decided we didn't need it.
Nonetheless, those we spoke to did not, and would not ever even think of IVA or insurances. In fact, I don't believe anyone we've ever hired for anything has ever even mentioned either. I am not arguing what is legal or not. Simply pointing out that most probably wouldn't even know what to do with it.
Nonetheless, those we spoke to did not, and would not ever even think of IVA or insurances. In fact, I don't believe anyone we've ever hired for anything has ever even mentioned either. I am not arguing what is legal or not. Simply pointing out that most probably wouldn't even know what to do with it.
#14
Absolutely wrong!
Anyone employing someone else to work on their property is required to have third-party liability insurance.
This was in the (Spanish) news some time back!
What does it matter if they live in the building? Aren't we talking about some one being employed (paid) to clean?
Anyone employing someone else to work on their property is required to have third-party liability insurance.
This was in the (Spanish) news some time back!
What does it matter if they live in the building? Aren't we talking about some one being employed (paid) to clean?
#15
Lost in BE Cyberspace










Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,749











Absolutely wrong!
Anyone employing someone else to work on their property is required to have third-party liability insurance.
This was in the (Spanish) news some time back!
What does it matter if they live in the building? Aren't we talking about some one being employed (paid) to clean?
Anyone employing someone else to work on their property is required to have third-party liability insurance.
This was in the (Spanish) news some time back!
What does it matter if they live in the building? Aren't we talking about some one being employed (paid) to clean?
I have a cleaner and no 3rd party insurance. And I am not going to get any



