![]() |
Re: Conflict of interest
Originally Posted by Pocaloca
(Post 10411123)
They could still have the special tax status and be an independent state like Andorra and Lichtenstein.
Originally Posted by Pocaloca
(Post 10411123)
I think its more the territorial waters that are causing the conflict these days. Since Franco's days Spain isn't actually claiming the Rock belongs to them.
Originally Posted by Pocaloca
(Post 10411123)
There's a lot of money to be made in offshore refuelling ... :sneaky:
|
Re: Conflict of interest
These territorial disputes over Gib always get Spanish media attention when it is necessary to hide other more important problems like the economy.
I wonder why :rofl::rofl::rofl: |
Re: Conflict of interest
Written Ministerial Statement by William Hague
10 December 2012 Gibraltar: Sites of Community Importance Any attempt by a Spanish State vessel, or vessel acting on behalf of the Spanish State, to exercise jurisdiction within BGTW is a violation of British sovereignty and we will respond accordingly. http://www.parliament.uk/documents/c...-Gibraltar.pdf |
Re: Conflict of interest
Originally Posted by Fredbargate
(Post 10425679)
Written Ministerial Statement by William Hague
10 December 2012 Gibraltar: Sites of Community Importance Any attempt by a Spanish State vessel, or vessel acting on behalf of the Spanish State, to exercise jurisdiction within BGTW is a violation of British sovereignty and we will respond accordingly. http://www.parliament.uk/documents/c...-Gibraltar.pdf sorry, no faith in Hague - any backbone he had was knocked out of him by Labour's Bliar when they called him racist at the 2001 General Election, didnt know how to react to it and hasnt been the same since. ` |
Re: Conflict of interest
Originally Posted by Domino
(Post 10425881)
so Spain is going to find out what it is like to be hit by a wet lettuce ? ?
` A Spanish warship made a two-hour incursion into Gibraltar waters on Monday evening, in a defiant response to Britain’s warnings to stay away. http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=27157 |
Re: Conflict of interest
Originally Posted by Fredbargate
(Post 10429009)
The wet lettuce failed.
A Spanish warship made a two-hour incursion into Gibraltar waters on Monday evening, in a defiant response to Britain’s warnings to stay away. http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=27157 The problem is that the RN boats can only harry the intruder, they have no positive instructions and rules of engagement. The Spanish know how long it takes for the information to get passed on and for the Ambassador to the Court of St James to be called and for him to arrive - so he can say that it was an error or some other twaddle, but the ship has now returned to Spanish waters. |
Re: Conflict of interest
Are we in a new Budget Spending Round at the Gobierno ? ?
Seems the Spanish Navy are keeping themselves in the National Press at the moment, this incident has had heavy reporting http://www.europapress.es/andalucia/...207155157.html (Spanish only) |
Re: Conflict of interest
Domino interfering with a vessel in International Waters sounds very much like piracy to me.
|
Re: Conflict of interest
Originally Posted by Fredbargate
(Post 10429693)
Domino interfering with a vessel in International Waters sounds very much like piracy to me.
ISTR there is bad blood about similar incidents vis a vis the american company and Spain over their wreck searching off Trafalgar and similar sites over a number of years. |
Re: Conflict of interest
Nuestra Señora de las Mercedes was sunk off the coast of Portugal although Spain often quoted it as being in their waters and not Gibraltars.
However I am not aware of any laws that prevent searches for wrecks in International Waters which are measured by reference to the distance from the shore and not by the depth of water. The arguments begin when establishing the ownership of any wreck / treasure etc. found. Sovereign vessels normally belong forever to their originating country. Merchant vessels belong to their owners or if an insurance company has paid out then they become the property of the insurance company who my sell them on to someone else. |
Re: Conflict of interest
What is the reason for holding on to Gibraltar ? I can see no valid strategic interest. You may not have noticed but the Empire went some time ago - and so did the Merchant Navy !
|
Re: Conflict of interest
Originally Posted by scot47
(Post 10431294)
What is the reason for holding on to Gibraltar ? I can see no valid strategic interest. You may not have noticed but the Empire went some time ago - and so did the Merchant Navy !
|
Re: Conflict of interest
Originally Posted by scot47
(Post 10431294)
What is the reason for holding on to Gibraltar ? I can see no valid strategic interest. You may not have noticed but the Empire went some time ago - and so did the Merchant Navy !
in case you didn't get the email/memo the Empire has been modernised to become The Commonwealth of Nations, normally referred to as the Commonwealth and formerly known as the British Commonwealth, is an intergovernmental organisation of 54 independent member states. The Merchant Navy is the maritime register of the United Kingdom, and describes the seagoing commercial interests of UK-registered ships and their crews. Merchant Navy vessels fly the Red Ensign and are regulated by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA). King George V bestowed the title of "Merchant Navy" on the British merchant shipping fleets following their service in the First World War. Whilst it is much smaller than it used to be this is because companies have changed hands, been bought up by foreign interests and their ships are now registered in places that don't even have a shoreline, letalone a port. However, that doesn't mean the expertise of British Merchant Officers isnt recognised the world over. Just remember that similarly British Steel is now owned by TATA, an Indian company, but you aren't shouting about that. Gibraltar as an international port will fuel, water and feed any nationality of vessel that calls in - for a fee, especially as its importance to the Royal Navy is much less. But that doesn't diminish its importance to NATO and the US Navy in ensuring a busy channel is kept open. Hope you find this little bit of maritime history of use and perhaps when you have visited Gib a few times you will come to understand its importance. ` |
Re: Conflict of interest
|
Re: Conflict of interest
Originally Posted by jackytoo
(Post 10431878)
Daily Mail has picked up the story now.
The first one is positively ancient, and I've no idea where the second one was taken |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 2:25 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.