Chinook crash
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz
Posts: 7,653
Chinook crash
At long bloody last some justice has been done. The copter crashed some 20 years ago, killing a lot of people and the two pilots were blamed, despite the fact that it was common knowledge among those in the know that there were problems with the navigation systems. One of the pilots concerned had written to his father saying how concerned they were with the problems, but they had been ordered to use them.
Worst of all, the MOD had been advised by the testing people on the Chinooks that the entire fleet should be grounded the day before the crash.
Despite all this, the MOD took the attitude that it was better to slander the dead pilots as they couldn't complain.
20 years for their names to be cleared, and people wonder why I always say you should never, never ever work for government in any way, shape or form.
Worst of all, the MOD had been advised by the testing people on the Chinooks that the entire fleet should be grounded the day before the crash.
Despite all this, the MOD took the attitude that it was better to slander the dead pilots as they couldn't complain.
20 years for their names to be cleared, and people wonder why I always say you should never, never ever work for government in any way, shape or form.
#2
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,368
Re: Chinook crash
We've been drip fed snippets of information about this case, and unless we have all the details that the MOD would have have had, and/or are experts on chinooks flight systems, I don't we are in any way fit to pass judgement one way or another. It would be pure speculation on our part as laymen.
#3
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: In the middle of 10million Olive Trees
Posts: 12,053
Re: Chinook crash
We've been drip fed snippets of information about this case, and unless we have all the details that the MOD would have have had, and/or are experts on chinooks flight systems, I don't we are in any way fit to pass judgement one way or another. It would be pure speculation on our part as laymen.
for years many people in and out of the RAF have been saying the original decision was wrong. There are technical and weather reasons why it was at best a dodgy knee jerk reaction.
because of the way it was designed (by a drunken yank) and the way it has to be operated it has had a very chequered history. that our MOD decided to do major changes to the spec after delivery didn't help.
a day or so ago the senior officer who made that decision refused to change his mind - came over as the sort who would blame anyone for anything so long as it was understood it wasnt his fault. He more or less said that the helicopter hit the ground so the pilots were at fault and there can be no arguement on that matter.
and who was the numpty that decided so many senior people from a variety of services should all be in the same helicopter at the same time.
#4
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz
Posts: 7,653
Re: Chinook crash
We've been drip fed snippets of information about this case, and unless we have all the details that the MOD would have have had, and/or are experts on chinooks flight systems, I don't we are in any way fit to pass judgement one way or another. It would be pure speculation on our part as laymen.
1. The pilots were complaining about it being unsafe.
2. The MOD were advised by their own experts that the chinook fleet should be grounded.
Imagine you were running a business supplying minibusses to people, and you were told by the drivers that they were unsafe, and your own mechanics said they needed to be taken off the road at once, and you did nothing, and then one of them crashed killing the driver and all his passengers. If you then blamed that driver, what would that make you?
Clue. First letter C, last letter T.
#7
Re: Chinook crash
Two points.
1. The pilots were complaining about it being unsafe.
2. The MOD were advised by their own experts that the chinook fleet should be grounded.
Imagine you were running a business supplying minibusses to people, and you were told by the drivers that they were unsafe, and your own mechanics said they needed to be taken off the road at once, and you did nothing, and then one of them crashed killing the driver and all his passengers. If you then blamed that driver, what would that make you?
1. The pilots were complaining about it being unsafe.
2. The MOD were advised by their own experts that the chinook fleet should be grounded.
Imagine you were running a business supplying minibusses to people, and you were told by the drivers that they were unsafe, and your own mechanics said they needed to be taken off the road at once, and you did nothing, and then one of them crashed killing the driver and all his passengers. If you then blamed that driver, what would that make you?
#8
Lost in BE Cyberspace
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,368
Re: Chinook crash
So you reckon they simply opted to ignore everybody, were perfectly happen to let all those high ranking officers and highly expensively trained aircrew plough into the ground? Do you think they'd have stuffed that helicopter with top brass if they had any serious doubts about their safety? As I said, you know what you have read, which will be a lot less info than the MOD had before it ok'ed the flights.
#9
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: In the middle of 10million Olive Trees
Posts: 12,053
Re: Chinook crash
unless you could
a. blame the driver despite what everyone in the know was telling you
b. hide behind good old Crown Immunity
The attitude of the RAF officer I mentioned earlier sounded just like a general from WWI - I sent the guys out there but its their fault they died
by the way, what happened to the fog, mist and the low level flying that contributed to them hitting that particular piece of landscape. They seem to have been forgotten along with IIRC that machine was "bare bones" and didn't have a radar.
a. blame the driver despite what everyone in the know was telling you
b. hide behind good old Crown Immunity
The attitude of the RAF officer I mentioned earlier sounded just like a general from WWI - I sent the guys out there but its their fault they died
by the way, what happened to the fog, mist and the low level flying that contributed to them hitting that particular piece of landscape. They seem to have been forgotten along with IIRC that machine was "bare bones" and didn't have a radar.
#10
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: In the middle of 10million Olive Trees
Posts: 12,053
Re: Chinook crash
So you reckon they simply opted to ignore everybody, were perfectly happen to let all those high ranking officers and highly expensively trained aircrew plough into the ground? Do you think they'd have stuffed that helicopter with top brass if they had any serious doubts about their safety? As I said, you know what you have read, which will be a lot less info than the MOD had before it ok'ed the flights.
Forces mentality is just a little skewed from the normal H&S riddled life of today, it was improving but not as you would understand it, sri
Last edited by Domino; Jul 13th 2011 at 7:08 pm.
#11
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Vejer de la Fra., Cadiz
Posts: 7,653
Re: Chinook crash
So you reckon they simply opted to ignore everybody, were perfectly happen to let all those high ranking officers and highly expensively trained aircrew plough into the ground? Do you think they'd have stuffed that helicopter with top brass if they had any serious doubts about their safety? As I said, you know what you have read, which will be a lot less info than the MOD had before it ok'ed the flights.
As someone here has pointed out, putting so many important people on one chopper was pretty bloody stupid anyway.