![]() |
Re: Chiclana
Originally Posted by Cadiz Builders
What amazes me is that your abogados failed to ask for a Licencia de Primera ocupacion. Hmm, me too! |
Re: Chiclana
Originally Posted by NicCol
I was wondering if you could go into more detail about the "Licencia de primera ocupacion" please? Who issues that, is it the builders or the town hall, is it something we, as buyers have to pick up or should it be part of the completion process? I have just e-mailed my solicitor to make sure we are getting one on our completion, but I need to sound knowledgeable!
Thanks NicCol in what area are you buying in? If Chiclana then very few builders will even obtain a building licence! I am utterly amazed at the following statement on the link kindly supplied by Arco-Iris "Only when the certificates of completion of the building and the certificate of occupancy have been issued, can the purchase deed be duly finalized and notarised. The developer shall obtain and pay them." I would be very interested in this case how nearly 20000 houses without these licences have been sold through a notario and IVA of 7% has been paid on these properties to Hacienda. |
Re: Chiclana
Originally Posted by Arco-Iris
NicCol. Here is a link to the legal site that lists what you need, who obtains it, etc. Would that we had known about this right at the beginning.
http://www.spainlawyer.com/guialegal...04010107030000 |
Re: Chiclana
Originally Posted by mitzipurr
This is very serious stuff where did you read this. I presume the main man at the council is denying all responsibility for allowing them to be built in the first place?
I cannot confirm the figure of 500 legal builds in the last year but I am certain that the illegal builds constructed last year far outweigh this number. Why should the whole sorry mess fall onto the shoulders of the innocent house buyer who has done all the right things by using a Estate Agent,Spanish Lawyer, Notary and paid 7% IVA on his purchase. Some of these illegal properties even pay IBI to the council! Only last month I was shown a plot of land with a old finca on it. I was informed that they will be constructing 4 houses on the plot using just the one electric meter belonging to the finca. Why doesn't the council put a stop to this. What a silly queston think we all know the reason :rolleyes:?? |
Re: Chiclana
Well I can't see that any of us out in the Campa would get one. There are no street lights etc around us and the father out you are surely the worse it will be? What we really need is someone from the Town Hall to address the meeting tomorrow. Who is actually organising it, does anyone know?
|
Re: Chiclana
Originally Posted by Cadiz Builders
When buying any new property you should always make sure that the builder has satisfied his obligations with the ayuntamiento and demand to have a "Licencia de Primera Ocupacion". You should not purchase any new property without this document.
The builder has obligations with certain government departments apart from the property which you are purchasing the surrounding area must also meet minimum requirements before the Licencia de Primera Ocupacion can be issued. Street lighting, footpaths, mains sewerage etc. It is not simply the house it is also the environment it is in. In some cases you may not even be able to empadronar with the ayuntamiento. As builders ourselves, when we build a new property we are entitled to constructors water and electricity which includes a meter. This is where a lot of the cofussion seems to be comming from. Once a property is completed and the new owners receive their Licencia de Primera Ocupacion the constructors supply which in most cases is only 180 volts must be cut off and a new 240 volt residential meter installed. It sounds to me as if the builders are not declaring the property and are simply leaving the builders supply installed meters and all, which is why some of you have metres. What amazes me is that your abogados failed to ask for a Licencia de Primera ocupacion. |
Re: Chiclana
Further news.
A friend of a friend has been refused a meter in Rana Verde. Why? Surely as this is shortly due for urbanisation there should be nothing stopping it. Secondly a friend in Pago saw that her road had a channel with a black pipe put in early one morning. When she enquired of a Spanish neighbour she was informed that this was to provide illegal electricity for two new houses being built further down the road. So as we all know it is still going on. |
Re: Chiclana
Originally Posted by mitzipurr
NicCol in what area are you buying in? If Chiclana then very few builders will even obtain a building licence! I am utterly amazed at the following statement on the link kindly supplied by Arco-Iris "Only when the certificates of completion of the building and the certificate of occupancy have been issued, can the purchase deed be duly finalized and notarised. The developer shall obtain and pay them."
I would be very interested in this case how nearly 20000 houses without these licences have been sold through a notario and IVA of 7% has been paid on these properties to Hacienda. |
Re: Chiclana
Another question - My solicitor says he is waiting for the deeds and then he is taking them for registration. Does anyone know exactly what this means and does it look hopeful?
|
Re: Chiclana
Originally Posted by poollounger
I am intrigued.....what is the situation when one lives in a non urbanised area with a pump and borehole ? We have speed bumps in the dirt road off which our cul de sac leads, some lighting, and mains electricity. If the LdP is a requisite in every case and the Notary is responsible for witnessing and ensuring all documentation is accurate, then surely he should be the one querying the absence of a LdP ?? I certainly do not seem to have one, have been assured by the agent that is is not required as there was a previous property on the site, and we have mains electricity and standing orders being paid to Endesa. In every way it seems to me that Chiclana is an exception to the rule.
The notary witnesses the fact that there is a "Declaracion de Obra Nueva" a new building has been declared and the tax man should receive his 7%, not that it is fit for the purpose it is inteded for or that it has been issued a Licencia de Primera Ocupacion by the ayuntamiento. Simply that a new building exists. The law is quite clear. A licencia de primera ocupacion is a requirement for any new building or a building which has had an increase in volume or a building that has undergone substantial modifications. I have asked our architect to prepare an article regarding the Licencia de Primera Ocupacion you can read it here: Licencia de Pimera Ocupacion |
Re: Chiclana
Thanks Cadiz Builders for clear info and web links. All safely saved and printed as ammunition for the time we may need to jump into action. When that will be is anyone's guess for those like us, who live in an area where urbanisation plans are in the far distant future and who have a long-standing Endesa contract, a landline, water from a well and a pozo negro or septic tank.
The "Help Yourself" meeting was held in a bar and some people there were out for their evening drink and carried on their conversations, so it was very difficult to hear the speakers, even with a microphone. A member of the Partido Popular was the main speaker, who has allied herself with those unfortunate people who are without electricity and have no hope of getting it without their Licence of First Occupation (LFO). The main thrust of the meeting was to form an Association to make representations to the Ayuntamiento about their predicament and Endesa's seemingly selective approach to connecting illegal properties. Questions were asked about the LFO, with accusations of scare-mongering and rebuttals from property owners that, licence or no licence, they were legal. It all got quite noisy and contentious and too much for me, quite frankly, and I left. Maybe another forum user, with better hearing and more stamina, attended this meeting and can add more useful comments than I can. A Spanish friend attended and I commented to her that there didn't seem to be many Spanish people at the meeting and, surely, they are just as affected, her reply was "well, yes they are, but they just don't care". |
Re: Chiclana
Originally Posted by NicCol
I am buying in Pago. What confuses me, is how can they charge you IVA and then turn round and say its illegal?
That is the million dollar question that I would also like the answer too!! |
Re: Chiclana
Originally Posted by NicCol
Another question - My solicitor says he is waiting for the deeds and then he is taking them for registration. Does anyone know exactly what this means and does it look hopeful?
Do you mean the escitura for the property. If so then all the so called illegal houses will have this document. |
Re: Chiclana
Originally Posted by Arco-Iris
Thanks Cadiz Builders for clear info and web links. All safely saved and printed as ammunition for the time we may need to jump into action. When that will be is anyone's guess for those like us, who live in an area where urbanisation plans are in the far distant future and who have a long-standing Endesa contract, a landline, water from a well and a pozo negro or septic tank.
The "Help Yourself" meeting was held in a bar and some people there were out for their evening drink and carried on their conversations, so it was very difficult to hear the speakers, even with a microphone. A member of the Partido Popular was the main speaker, who has allied herself with those unfortunate people who are without electricity and have no hope of getting it without their Licence of First Occupation (LFO). The main thrust of the meeting was to form an Association to make representations to the Ayuntamiento about their predicament and Endesa's seemingly selective approach to connecting illegal properties. Questions were asked about the LFO, with accusations of scare-mongering and rebuttals from property owners that, licence or no licence, they were legal. It all got quite noisy and contentious and too much for me, quite frankly, and I left. Maybe another forum user, with better hearing and more stamina, attended this meeting and can add more useful comments than I can. A Spanish friend attended and I commented to her that there didn't seem to be many Spanish people at the meeting and, surely, they are just as affected, her reply was "well, yes they are, but they just don't care". That figures there fellow countrymen who have built these illegal properties certainly do not care. |
Re: Chiclana
Originally Posted by Cadiz Builders
It doesn't matter if there was an existing building previously on the site. If it is not the one you have now or you have carried out major restoration building work you will require a Licencia de Primera Ocupacion.
The notary witnesses the fact that there is a "Declaracion de Obra Nueva" a new building has been declared and the tax man should receive his 7%, not that it is fit for the purpose it is inteded for or that it has been issued a Licencia de Primera Ocupacion by the ayuntamiento. Simply that a new building exists. The law is quite clear. A licencia de primera ocupacion is a requirement for any new building or a building which has had an increase in volume or a building that has undergone substantial modifications. I have asked our architect to prepare an article regarding the Licencia de Primera Ocupacion you can read it here: Licencia de Pimera Ocupacion |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:51 am. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.