|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 9335523)
More likely if you are not English you have a massive chip about it...
It kind of passively annoys me. |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by commander
(Post 9335528)
More than likely you are wrong.I don't even have a small chip about it.
It kind of passively annoys me. |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by commander
(Post 9335524)
Yea, Goodbye Britain's Rose would have sounded awful. After all you don't get roses outside of England ;-)
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by commander
(Post 9335528)
More than likely you are wrong.I don't even have a small chip about it.
It kind of passively annoys me. However, I also find it interesting to see non English-Brits whinge on about not being fully included then, at the same time, want to be devolved. I'm also amused that you never see a george's cross painted on someone's face yet given any opportunity a face will be painted blue... Likewise, I don't care... just find it amusing. |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by commander
(Post 9335506)
Its like that poofy twat Elton when dodi di died, 'goodbye Englands rose'..Very fitting for a BRITISH icon and the princess of WALES. If your English you don't see it, if your not, it stands out a mile.
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by lionheart
(Post 9335536)
Don't be a plonker. Next you will be saying that the Duke of Edinburgh is Scottish.:rofl: Lady Diana was as English as the Mendip Hills.
You are missing my point totally. |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Oh please, not all this, yet again. (Besides Phil is more German/Danish than anything else.)
As far as I am concerned the event was about Britishness more than royalty. I am no monarchist and think a hereditary monarchy is an anachronism in this day and age, but it is is about our shared history and traditions. No other nation does pomp and ceremony like we do and the whole event looked fabulous. As for the naysayers: no one was forced to watch it, the event showed Britain in a good light (for once), has probably increased tourism and gave us back a little pride, at least for a while. As with any young couple getting married I wish them well. |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by commander
(Post 9335528)
More than likely you are wrong.I don't even have a small chip about it.
It kind of passively annoys me. Anyway, as Meow says, let's not go down this never-ending road again. |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by Millsyisland
(Post 9335578)
Your initial comment proves you are more than 'passively' annoyed by it.
Anyway, as Meow says, let's not go down this never-ending road again. Pease remember that i have lived in England for years have served in HM forces for a lot of years am a royalist to the core and dont wear a 'see you jimmy' bunnet and paint my face. so my comment actually proves nothing, apart from highlighting your incorrect assumptions of a stranger. lets move along.. |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by commander
(Post 9335582)
dont wear a 'see you jimmy' bunnet and paint my face.
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 9335584)
really? shit. I need to readdress my mental image of you.
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by commander
(Post 9335587)
i think i have mine spot on about you though millhouse
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by commander
(Post 9335582)
no my initial comment was a display of passive annoyance.
Pease remember that i have lived in England for years have served in HM forces for a lot of years am a royalist to the core and dont wear a 'see you jimmy' bunnet and paint my face. so my comment actually proves nothing, apart from highlighting your incorrect assumptions of a stranger. lets move along.. |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 9335589)
do I wear glasses?
but skinnier. |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by Millsyisland
(Post 9335591)
Let's do that.
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by commander
(Post 9335592)
raybands. I think you are a spilling image of the 'Hoff'
but skinnier. http://www.effectiveict.co.uk/file.p...disco_stu2.gif |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by commander
(Post 9335593)
are you Mr last word?:D
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
it did have its plus points ( not just Kate's nips )
http://pippasass.com/wp-content/uplo...dleton-ass.jpg |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by Sandboy
(Post 9335689)
it did have its plus points ( not just Kate's nips )
http://pippasass.com/wp-content/uplo...dleton-ass.jpg |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by co durham boy
(Post 9335695)
I bet Pippa does a turn that's for sure , she's as fit as a Pikeys dog..!
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by Sandboy
(Post 9335758)
start typing her name in google and it suggests "pippa midleton's arse" :thumbup:
google.co.uk - suggestion is removing a radiator / removing tiles google.ae (english) - suggestion is removing a bra photos & removing blood stains. What do those boys search for... |
Re: The Royal Wedding
1 Attachment(s)
Do I detect a hint of block-and-tackle lurking beneath the dress in this picture.........? :wub:
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
What is block and tackle?
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
nobody has commented on how nice her hair looks - I'm disappointed guys - shame on you.
remember, always compliment how nice the hair looks before anything else. |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by kittycat1
(Post 9335848)
What is block and tackle?
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 9335853)
nobody has commented on how nice her hair looks - I'm disappointed guys - shame on you.
remember, always compliment how nice the hair looks before anything else. |
Re: The Royal Wedding
1 Attachment(s)
About to become the most hated man in Britain............... Alex Loudon.
:frown: |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by The Dean
(Post 9335873)
About to become the most hated man in Britain............... Alex Loudon.
:frown: |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by Meow
(Post 9335877)
Er, who is he & why? What has this to do with that wedding? :confused:
http://bumpshack.com/2011/04/28/pipp...royal-wedding/ |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by The Dean
(Post 9335882)
The wedding is over, they can sink back to obscurity now, hopefully. |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Now, don't get me wrong - the pipster is nice enough. But, she's not exactly a beauty never to have been seen before. I don't understand the attention she is getting.
There, I said it. I think the pipster is distinctly average... |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 9335892)
There, I said it. I think the pipster is distinctly average...
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by Meow
(Post 9335890)
How on earth would I know that he is the boyfriend of Pippa Middleton? I didn't even know of her existence until a week ago.
The wedding is over, they can sink back to obscurity now, hopefully. They will be the go-to couple for journos for months to come. |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by Charismatic
(Post 9335918)
But her ass stole the show a bit/lot in an otherwise tedious event for those of us not interested in hats.
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
I'm with Millhouse on this one, other than her wearing a dress that shows her pear shaped arse off a treat she isnt exactly what I would call a stunner.She looks to be all of a size 8 which out of the dress would show a distinct lack of curves . It's amazing what a professional make up artist and hair stylist plus a designer dress can do to help a girl scrub up. Its a great frock but that's it as far as Im concerned and Dean there is no sign of a suspender belt which you would definitely be able to see as she went up the steps. I suggest you boys go and have a cold shower.
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 9335892)
Now, don't get me wrong - the pipster is nice enough. But, she's not exactly a beauty never to have been seen before. I don't understand the attention she is getting.
There, I said it. I think the pipster is distinctly average... |
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by PunkStep
(Post 9336278)
Dishy, but she looks like she's been starving herself for the big day, and Kate looked a little gaunt herself.
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by kittycat1
(Post 9336259)
I'm with Millhouse on this one, other than her wearing a dress that shows her pear shaped arse off a treat she isnt exactly what I would call a stunner.She looks to be all of a size 8 which out of the dress would show a distinct lack of curves . It's amazing what a professional make up artist and hair stylist plus a designer dress can do to help a girl scrub up. Its a great frock but that's it as far as Im concerned and Dean there is no sign of a suspender belt which you would definitely be able to see as she went up the steps. I suggest you boys go and have a cold shower.
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Looks like its just a flow in the dress not necessarily anything under it, nice idea but come on there was a world watching, They would not allow anything that would bring the future royal into disrepute, and am pretty sure stockies n sussies are a no go!!!
|
Re: The Royal Wedding
Originally Posted by The Dean
(Post 9336442)
No, look again (my photo in post 102).......... there's a small 'bump' on the upper bit of her right buttock. What's that then?
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 1:17 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.