British Expats
Page 2 of 4
1
2
3
4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

British Expats (https://britishexpats.com/forum/)
-   The Sand Pit (https://britishexpats.com/forum/sand-pit-116/)
-   -   The Royal Wedding (https://britishexpats.com/forum/sand-pit-116/royal-wedding-714913/)

lionheart Apr 29th 2011 2:10 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by MacScot (Post 9333250)
Congrats to the Earl and Countess of Strathearn.
Do you mean the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge?

lionheart Apr 29th 2011 2:13 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Blue Cat (Post 9333368)
... thought William and Harry looked a mess though.
How on earth can William be described as looking a mess? Harry looked fine with his hair unkempt. It suits him.

soukie Apr 29th 2011 2:17 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Prince Andrew's daughters were as well dressed as ever!

littlejimmy Apr 29th 2011 2:27 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Well, I wasn't really bothered about it, but since I was in the pub at the Park Rotana this afternoon, I couldn't avoid it. It's all very impressive and pompy and ceremonious and all that. I was again taken aback by the level of patriotism on display by British Expats waving their flags and cheering the national anthem. If I'd asked any of them if they wanted to go back to the UK, I doubt many would have answered in the positive. C'est la vie.

Alexa Apr 29th 2011 2:29 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Blue Cat (Post 9333404)
I think Britain has had a tough few years and this is what the public wanted, many of them may well not be Royalists but are enjoying Britain receiving some positive public attention.
You know, I can't really say why, but to me it felt good to watch it. Maybe because we do not see many displays of our traditions and culture anymore.

Blue Cat Apr 29th 2011 2:30 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by lionheart (Post 9333416)
How on earth can William be described as looking a mess? Harry looked fine with his hair unkempt. It suits him.
I am not a great fan of military attire to be honest with you. Too many colours, and the yellow trim on his cap was vile

Blue Cat Apr 29th 2011 2:33 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Alexa (Post 9333435)
You know, I can't really say why, but to me it felt good to watch it. Maybe because we do not see many displays of our traditions and culture anymore.
it's the feel good factor, seeing everyone happy etc, I just wish they would stop mentioning Diana! it is kate and William's day.

Alexa Apr 29th 2011 2:39 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Blue Cat (Post 9333442)
it's the feel good factor, seeing everyone happy etc, I just wish they would stop mentioning Diana! it is kate and William's day.
Well, I guess you can't avoid it. am sure a lot of people will be thinking of her today.

Blue Cat Apr 29th 2011 2:40 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Alexa (Post 9333450)
Well, I guess you can't avoid it. am sure a lot of people will be thinking of her today.
I loved Diana, I thought she was an amazing lady, the whole saga was so unbelievably sad. She adored her sons and would have been so proud to see him today.

Millsyisland Apr 29th 2011 2:44 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
I loved every minute of it an am feeling hugely proud to be British. She looked beautiful and was just so relaxed, she is an asset to the royal family.

Any of you British 'humbugs' can just change the channel and bugger off.

desertmum Apr 29th 2011 3:14 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Only saw the last five minutes of the wedding - thought the dress was lovely but why had they given her pointy boobs ? Have to agree about the military dress - looked very frumpy I thought.

Alexa Apr 29th 2011 3:22 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Blue Cat (Post 9333452)
I loved Diana, I thought she was an amazing lady, the whole saga was so unbelievably sad. She adored her sons and would have been so proud to see him today.
Yes, I think she would have been very happy for her son.

kittycat1 Apr 29th 2011 3:38 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
I wish I was in London! Thought it was fab though, she looked gorgeous- definitely something odd going on on the boob area but gorgeous all the same. They look to be a very happy couple, so wish them all the best.

I thought Charles looked very well and Queeny looked great for a lady in her 80's! Beatrice and Eugene looked terrible- and best hat for me was Tamara Palmer Tomkinson- fab Philip Treacy number.

My favorite moment however was when they arrived at Buckingham palace and the coach driver was helping Kate out and was handed the train of her dress, he looked around for a moment as if to say what the hell do I do with this and then just dropped it- very funny. Anyway what a fantastic show of grandeur!

:D

Boomhauer Apr 29th 2011 4:20 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Victoria Becham's shoes scream stripper heels.
http://photos.toofab.com/galleries/r...cent&id=371674

kittycat1 Apr 29th 2011 4:22 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Christ not bad when your pregnant to be in 5-6 inches!

desertmum Apr 29th 2011 4:25 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
I laughed at the dumping the train on the ground too ! Loved some of the hats and some of them were truly awful. Now waiting with glee to watch Fashion Police with Joan Rivers which will no doubt be hugely funny. :)

MacScot Apr 29th 2011 4:25 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by lionheart (Post 9333410)
Do you mean the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge?
Nope. :sneaky::)

kittycat1 Apr 29th 2011 4:26 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
desertmum- oh I cant wait- I love Joan Rivers she is wickedly funny! :thumbsup:

kittycat1 Apr 29th 2011 4:31 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
2 mins in

commander Apr 29th 2011 5:10 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by desertmum (Post 9333493)
Only saw the last five minutes of the wedding - thought the dress was lovely but why had they given her pointy boobs ? Have to agree about the military dress - looked very frumpy I thought.
i thought Harry's (williams step brother) uniform was about 2 sizes too big for him.

Now if they wore the uniform of the senior service, it would have been different. understated.

Boomhauer Apr 29th 2011 6:57 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by commander (Post 9333663)
i thought Harry's (williams step brother) uniform was about 2 sizes too big for him.

Now if they wore the uniform of the senior service, it would have been different. understated.
http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...here-house.jpg

The Dean Apr 29th 2011 7:52 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by kittycat1 (Post 9333527)
I wish I was in London! Thought it was fab though, she looked gorgeous- definitely something odd going on on the boob area but gorgeous all the same. They look to be a very happy couple, so wish them all the best.

I thought Charles looked very well and Queeny looked great for a lady in her 80's! Beatrice and Eugene looked terrible- and best hat for me was Tamara Palmer Tomkinson- fab Philip Treacy number.

My favorite moment however was when they arrived at Buckingham palace and the coach driver was helping Kate out and was handed the train of her dress, he looked around for a moment as if to say what the hell do I do with this and then just dropped it- very funny. Anyway what a fantastic show of grandeur!

:D
That boob area thing............

Deanlette reckons she mush have had prominently erect nipples, and they were trying their.... er.... hardest to hide them.

Charismatic Apr 29th 2011 2:00 pm
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by kittycat1 (Post 9332918)
This is Britain showing the world our history, a ceremony that you won't see anywhere else. All the pomp and ceremony, it is impressive no matter how much of a miserable bugger you are. If you don't normally feel proud of being British then today you can.
But this is something anti-Royalists wouldn't understand, they see the Monarchy simply as a system of hereditary office but don't know or understand the history of the ordinary people with the Monarchy. In an ever changing world with new politics for every generation we have always had one family we look to for leadership, a constant in the traditional English (if I dare say "British") way of life.

Sure we have fallen out a few times with them (and them with each other and us) but since James II and the Bill of Rights really we've had rather a good thing going. We still trust the monarchy with Royal Assent and ultimate control of that unruly beast of parliament, they trust us in electing a suitable government (something we haven't always been so good at). It's an imperfect system, as all systems of government are, for an imperfect people but what is the point of a country without a sense of place and belonging that history gives us?

I think that's why Americans often have secret Monarch envy. They lack that sense of continued reform and process in government, like a moody teenager trying to distance themselves from their parents but now realizing full well that America needs to confront it's own problems without a constant in government to turn to. Would we want to try and fill those holes with the unjoyful inequality of rampant capitalism and unflinching consumerism?

In summary: Being English has it's merits :D.

littlejimmy Apr 29th 2011 3:57 pm
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Charismatic (Post 9334205)
But this is something anti-Royalists wouldn't understand, they see the Monarchy simply as a system of hereditary office but don't know or understand the history of the ordinary people with the Monarchy. In an ever changing world with new politics for every generation we have always had one family we look to for leadership, a constant in the traditional English (if I dare say "British") way of life.

Sure we have fallen out a few times with them (and them with each other and us) but since James II and the Bill of Rights really we've had rather a good thing going. We still trust the monarchy with Royal Assent and ultimate control of that unruly beast of parliament, they trust us in electing a suitable government (something we haven't always been so good at). It's an imperfect system, as all systems of government are, for an imperfect people but what is the point of a country without a sense of place and belonging that history gives us?

I think that's why Americans often have secret Monarch envy. They lack that sense of continued reform and process in government, like a moody teenager trying to distance themselves from their parents but now realizing full well that America needs to confront it's own problems without a constant in government to turn to. Would we want to try and fill those holes with the unjoyful inequality of rampant capitalism and unflinching consumerism?

In summary: Being English has it's merits :D.
To be fair, you could argue we're halfway there (the capitalist/consumer bit). I don't think that many people, be they pro-royalist or republican, think about or even understand the complicated historical context, and probably just see the younger members of the Royal Family as little more than extravagant celebrities to read about and gawp at in the tabloids and trashy magazines.

kittycat1 Apr 29th 2011 5:34 pm
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
1 Attachment(s)
snigger

Boomhauer Apr 29th 2011 6:04 pm
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
William is going bald at rather a young age.

Welivehere Apr 30th 2011 1:19 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Charismatic (Post 9334205)
But this is something anti-Royalists wouldn't understand, ....... In summary: Being English has it's merits :D.
Well put good sir... :thumbup:

Charismatic Apr 30th 2011 1:20 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Boomhauer (Post 9334346)
William is going bald at rather a young age.
I shouldn't imagine it had much impact on his marraige prospects being a prince and perhaps a future king of England.

Girls dig titles as you well know count von boomhauer ;-).

Charismatic Apr 30th 2011 1:47 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Welivehere (Post 9334685)
Well put good sir... :thumbup:
It's difficult to talk about history in a way that doesn't make it sound like a load of stuffy old nostalgia wheeled out so we can feel good about ourselves. History should be insightful and relevant, even contradictory at times...ours is all the above.

lionheart Apr 30th 2011 1:56 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Over 1,000 Brits at one "street party" in Dubai, really?http://en.news.maktoob.com/200900007...ty/Article.htm

PunkStep Apr 30th 2011 2:07 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Meow (Post 9331504)
Whenever I mention the temperature in Dubai on FB, your mother starts telling me to watch out for skin cancer. I take it she realises it's the sun and not the heat than can cause it? ;);)
:lol: Yes, and when I go skiing my wife always tells me to wear sun block because I'll be "closer to the sun". The sun is 93 million miles away so I don't think one mile going to make a difference. I'm no scientist but I think the sun light is more intense on the slopes because it's going through less of the earths atmosphere, and it's all reflected back up into your face. I don't usually correct her, I normally just reply with a "yes dear". That is the best way to deal with situations like that.

And lets be honest friends, we all watched the Royal Wedding

Blue Cat Apr 30th 2011 3:04 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by commander (Post 9333663)
i thought Harry's (williams step brother) uniform was about 2 sizes too big for him.

Now if they wore the uniform of the senior service, it would have been different. understated.
Prince William looked like something out of thunderbirds :)

The Dean Apr 30th 2011 4:41 am
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
1 Attachment(s)
Yes, yes, yes......... but what about little sister Pippa??? :wub:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-sto...5875-23096297/

commander Apr 30th 2011 3:43 pm
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Welivehere (Post 9334685)
Well put good sir... :thumbup:
So well put, I mean, its all about England isn't it.

Its that English arrogance coming to the fore again.

Millsyisland Apr 30th 2011 3:49 pm
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by commander (Post 9335492)
So well put, I mean, its all about England isn't it.

Its that English arrogance coming to the fore again.
Here we go......

commander Apr 30th 2011 4:01 pm
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Millsyisland (Post 9335495)
Here we go......
No, here we don't go.

Just saying...there is more than England involved and celebrating the royal wedding...


Its like that poofy twat Elton when dodi di died, 'goodbye Englands rose'..

Very fitting for a BRITISH icon and the princess of WALES.

If your English you don't see it, if your not, it stands out a mile.

Blue Cat Apr 30th 2011 4:13 pm
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
I don't think the song would have sounded quite the same if had tried to incorporate Britain and Wales but I know where you are coming from :)

Millhouse Apr 30th 2011 4:17 pm
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by commander (Post 9335506)

If your English you don't see it, if your not, it stands out a mile.
More likely if you are not English you have a massive chip about it...

commander Apr 30th 2011 4:18 pm
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by Blue Cat (Post 9335518)
I don't think the song would have sounded quite the same if had tried to incorporate Britain and Wales but I know where you are coming from :)
Yea, Goodbye Britain's Rose would have sounded awful. After all you don't get roses outside of England ;-)

Charismatic Apr 30th 2011 4:18 pm
Re: The Royal Wedding
 
Originally Posted by littlejimmy (Post 9334275)
To be fair, you could argue we're halfway there (the capitalist/consumer bit).
This is really going to sound terrible and many of you will think me wrong but I get a real feeling amongst the young and educated today that things are changing towards a post-materialist world. That is not to say that they won't be great consumers but that the type of consuming educated people are doing is changing towards having less items with a higher value (both in terms of money and function).
Originally Posted by commander (Post 9335492)
Its that English arrogance coming to the fore again.
How could we be modest patriots when talking about England?* :wub:

*A country, I'm loathed to point out, most of us don't live in :lol:. But isn't England even more splendid from afar? :wub:


All times are GMT -12. The time now is 6:32 am.
Page 2 of 4
1
2
3
4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.