![]() |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by MataHari
(Post 7136064)
jeez..I must be thick..but why did you then vote to ban BM...as that was the question of the poll...
also because to makes the poll a bit more interesting |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by Inselaffen
(Post 7136117)
i voted to ban him for contents of previous messages.
also because to makes the poll a bit more interesting |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by thetruth
(Post 7136101)
You are over complicating things in an attempt to be amusing. Simply put, it is illegal to voice your opinion in support of the state of Israel in the UAE. End of story.
|
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by thetruth
(Post 7136101)
You are over complicating things in an attempt to be amusing. Simply put, it is illegal to voice your opinion in support of the state of Israel in the UAE. End of story.
Again - saying Israel exists is not the same as supporting it. - |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
I am very confused now.....
You say: it is illegal to voice your opinion in support of the state of Israel in the UAE. End of story. |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by commander
(Post 7136114)
Do you agree with this?
|
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by still.unsure
(Post 7135999)
beard man's comments are, at times, approaching the absurd (i.e. the holocaust denier bit) but his opinions appear to be a representative slice of a section of the community in the mid-east. so, in the spirit of freedom of speech, let him back.
besides, he's far more entertaining that the likes of dbxdude and mantronic |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
in Europe I would be thrown in jail over denying the holocaust. |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by thetruth
(Post 7136133)
I agree with respecting the laws of the country I reside in, yes. I said this before, in Europe I would be thrown in jail over denying the holocaust.
You are more likely to be laughed at for being stupid & ignorant. - |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
You are more likely to be laughed at for being stupid & ignorant. |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by thetruth
(Post 7136101)
Simply put, it is illegal to voice your opinion in support of the state of Israel in the UAE. End of story.
|
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by thetruth
(Post 7136068)
I absolutely agree with you. This forum is great and infact on New Year's Eve I used it to check what venues were open that night. However, i do not want to go on this forum and see comments that are pro-Israeli. Israel is not recognized by the UAE and any such comments are illegal. The British expatriate community must be able to respect the place they are residing in. Etisalat and Du ban websites for much less reasons than some of the things I have read here.
|
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by Bison
(Post 7136132)
I am very confused now.....
You say: If the UAE do not recognise Israel and it is illegal to support them in any way shape or form, why do the UAE and Israel Co-Sponsor Arsenal Football Club and why does the UAE let an Israeli man have a business here in the form of the Atlantis Hotel? One more point. Doesnt anyone here have Arab and Muslim friends? I mean theoretically and legally speaking I could go to Jordan and Egypt and yell my support to Israel, but don't you think that will be insensitive towards everyone around me. |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by thetruth
(Post 7136158)
Hahaha. Israelis/Jews own EVERYTHING. Even you must surely know that the Jews are in control of almost all the cooperations worldwide. As sad and as accurate your comment is, it is inevitable that things like this happen.
One more point. Doesnt anyone here have Arab and Muslim friends? I mean theoretically and legally speaking I could go to Jordan and Egypt and yell my support to Israel, but don't you think that will be insensitive towards everyone around me. |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by thetruth
(Post 7136158)
Hahaha. Israelis/Jews own EVERYTHING. Even you must surely know that the Jews are in control of almost all the cooperations worldwide. As sad and as accurate your comment is, it is inevitable that things like this happen.
|
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by Bison
(Post 7136145)
Or set upon by the hounds.....
|
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by thetruth
(Post 7136158)
Hahaha. Israelis/Jews own EVERYTHING. Even you must surely know that the Jews are in control of almost all the cooperations worldwide. As sad and as accurate your comment is, it is inevitable that things like this happen.
One more point. Doesnt anyone here have Arab and Muslim friends? I mean theoretically and legally speaking I could go to Jordan and Egypt and yell my support to Israel, but don't you think that will be insensitive towards everyone around me. And not everyone here has 'yelled support for Israel'. Personally, I think we should get both of their leaders around a table and send Bison to go and knock some sense into both of them.. |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by thetruth
(Post 7136158)
Hahaha. Israelis/Jews own EVERYTHING. Even you must surely know that the Jews are in control of almost all the cooperations worldwide. As sad and as accurate your comment is, it is inevitable that things like this happen.
Just an example of 'ethics until it suits us otherwise' |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by thetruth
(Post 7136158)
Hahaha. Israelis/Jews own EVERYTHING. Even you must surely know that the Jews are in control of almost all the cooperations worldwide. As sad and as accurate your comment is, it is inevitable that things like this happen.
Not all Israelis are Jewish and not all Jews are Israeli. In fact, not all Jews support Israel. They quite separate you know. - |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by thetruth
(Post 7136068)
I absolutely agree with you. This forum is great and infact on New Year's Eve I used it to check what venues were open that night. However, i do not want to go on this forum and see comments that are pro-Israeli. Israel is not recognized by the UAE and any such comments are illegal. The British expatriate community must be able to respect the place they are residing in. Etisalat and Du ban websites for much less reasons than some of the things I have read here.
There is a poll running to see how posters feel about him being re-instated which seems fair to me...look up democracy when you have time to step off your soap box. |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Personally, I think we should get both of their leaders around a table and send Bison to go and knock some sense into both of them.. Bison |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
I hate this going to work thing . . I miss out on the all the excitement . . So I missed the post/thread being referred to - however the freedom of speech issue would make me want him unbanned but he is truly annoying with a blinkered view of the world, but he is also somewhat amusing . . . . Unban him for now you can always ban him again later. He'll probably turn up under another name anyway . . . In fact, he's probably voted already :)
N |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by Meow
(Post 7136187)
Not all Israelis are Jewish and not all Jews are Israeli. In fact, not all Jews support Israel. They quite separate you know.
- |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
I hate this going to work thing |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
I do wish you folks would slow down - it will take me ages to read all these threads :D Have just found the thread, he's a prat, ban him.
N |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by thetruth
(Post 7136212)
I am perfectly aware of that. I know Syrian, Iraqi and even Yemeni Jews. The enemy is never Judaism, the enemy is Zionism.
In that case we can also say that the enemy is not Islam it is fundamentalist muslims. (I dislike the term 'enemy' as it is very aggressive.) Sadly too few people seem to be able to separate zealots from moderates. - |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by Meow
(Post 7136235)
In that case we can also say that the enemy is not Islam it is fundamentalist muslims. (I dislike the term 'enemy' as it is very aggressive.)
Sadly too few people seem to be able to separate zealots from moderates. - |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by Worldismine
(Post 7136249)
You get nutters ideas everywhere, but what I don't agree with is when every Muslim militant is classed as a terrorist, not because their acts and circumstance necessarily fit the English language definition but because who their fighting, or who supports the people their fighting. Everyone is entitled to an army, and every army at one time or another has been or is responsible for terrorism, by its actual English language definition not the G W Bush/Fox news definition which naturally filters down.
Fighting in the name of religion is the biggest hypocrisy in the world. - |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by Meow
(Post 7136235)
In that case we can also say that the enemy is not Islam it is fundamentalist muslims. (I dislike the term 'enemy' as it is very aggressive.)
Sadly too few people seem to be able to separate zealots from moderates. - You say the problem is not with Islam, but with FUNDAMENTALIST Muslims, now think about what those two words actually mean and you will see that your opinion is a contradiction and cannot be true. |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Meow, too right. Whether you believe in God, Allah, Buddah or some wierd elephant (a colleague . . .) I refuse to believe they would want us to fight.
N |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by Nic1
(Post 7136262)
Meow, too right. Whether you believe in God, Allah, Buddah or some wierd elephant (a colleague . . .) I refuse to believe they would want us to fight.
N |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by Meow
(Post 7136235)
In that case we can also say that the enemy is not Islam it is fundamentalist muslims. (I dislike the term 'enemy' as it is very aggressive.)
Sadly too few people seem to be able to separate zealots from moderates. - "Enemy" might be aggresive to you. To me this seems much more aggressive: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28525691/ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7814490.stm |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by Meow
(Post 7136250)
Fighting in the name of religion is the biggest hypocrisy in the world.
- So its OK to travel 1000s of miles to another land to fight for your country. But its not OK to unite under religion to fight back. Or its OK to fight to defend your country and unite as Brits/Yanks/Martians when its attacked or oppressed but its not ok to unite under your religion to defend your land. Let me put it this way. If England and France were disputing in a similar fashion to Palestinians and Israelis. And the English strongly said we have to defend our country, it is our duty to free our land from occupation etc would they be fighting because of their nationality, or will they be fighting because of their circumstance, and will the English thing not just be uniting rallying call to motivate the fighters and give them something symbolic and greater and a greater purpose. Whether it's for your country or religion the psychology is the same, during times of war/conflict people sense of identity greatly increases and its usually one of those two things that will make people feel united. This also serves to make people feel stronger as it gives a sense of belonging to something bigger. Bottom line, the Western Armies only fight under the banner of their national flag because national identity is a stronger factor and has a significantly higher influence on its population then religion. If the majority of Brits were devoutly Christian and felt a strong sense of Brotherhood do you not think the leaders would use that instead? In the mid east its different and the same, because you had the wars of national identity in the mid 20th century, then when that failed Islam started becoming a unifying factor amongst segments of the population and now their is like a balance and feathered line between the two, this is best shown in Palestine between Hamas and Fatah, remember before 1987 the Palestinians were fighting under the banner of Palestine. Now you have Hamas who have emerged as an Islamic banner, and Fatah who more Palestine banner. |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Of course, anyone voting or posting on this thread is commenting on the actions of moderators and therefore should be banned too......
Much like Israel or any Islamic nation you care to mention, it's a police state... |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by shakh your bootie
(Post 7136364)
Of course, anyone voting or posting on this thread is commenting on the actions of moderators and therefore should be banned too......
Much like Israel or any Islamic nation you care to mention, it's a police state... |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
One other point, look at the speeches of GW Bush/Blair and opposing speeches by the people they condemn and are condemned by, the only difference is the placement and context with in which the two identities are used
|
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by shakh your bootie
(Post 7136364)
Of course, anyone voting or posting on this thread is commenting on the actions of moderators and therefore should be banned too......
Much like Israel or any Islamic nation you care to mention, it's a police state...
Originally Posted by MataHari
(Post 7136368)
sssshhhtttt...I don't think the mods have seen this thread yet....
(your making my cough worse! hubby is telling me to turn this off) |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by Bison
(Post 7135686)
I actually found that slightly amusing, am I a bad man?
|
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Originally Posted by Nic1
(Post 7136229)
I do wish you folks would slow down - it will take me ages to read all these threads :D Have just found the thread, he's a prat, ban him.
N |
Re: The Beard Man Issue...
Can if you want.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 5:32 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.