![]() |
Re: 1.26 and falling
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 12074453)
High-tech truly global manufactures in the UK will be benefit
The state of affairs in the UK could do with some positives, less it devolves into a globally insignificant subjectified union destined for a break up and relative reduction in living standards. |
Re: 1.26 and falling
Originally Posted by KJinDoha
(Post 12074493)
Here's hoping :fingerscrossed:
The state of affairs in the UK could do with some positives, less it devolves into a globally insignificant subjectified union destined for a break up and relative reduction in living standards. I saw yesterday that while GDP growth in the UK has been one of the highest in the EU for a while, GDP per capita growth was some of the lowest and even behind Spain. Think about that... it means two things (i) we grew richer a lot slower than everyone else, (ii) our economic growth was driven mostly my imported labour expansion. As GDP also includes internal consumption, this is a very poor position to be in. Some export growth due to a low currency will do us well. |
Re: 1.26 and falling
Question for Millhouse:
There's talks in the papers that certain banks are saying if the UK doesn't retain access to the single market then they would transfer some staff - not to the EU - but to places like New York. Can you explain that for me? I can understand transferring staff to the EU for passporting reasons but why New York? Or any other non-EU city? What kind of staff would be affected? It's all a bit byzantine to me. |
Re: 1.26 and falling
Originally Posted by DXBtoDOH
(Post 12074601)
Question for Millhouse:
There's talks in the papers that certain banks are saying if the UK doesn't retain access to the single market then they would transfer some staff - not to the EU - but to places like New York. Can you explain that for me? I can understand transferring staff to the EU for passporting reasons but why New York? Or any other non-EU city? What kind of staff would be affected? It's all a bit byzantine to me. If passporting rights are lost, then you'd have to move bankers to Europe - not NY. It won't happen though - no one in their right mind would even think of moving their staff to the EU (inflexible labour laws, bonus caps, language issues etc) and the euro-work will still happen in London. I can only imagine that they are thinking that if London becomes a backwater, then they will move their people to NY. A decision they were probably going to do anyway - That said, if the currency stays this weak, then it may also make sense to keep them in London. |
Re: 1.26 and falling
So it's likely an example of irrational overreaction? I wouldn't be surprised if it partly has to do with the extraordinarily high COL in London and NYC is now somewhat cheaper, and the bankers are using this as an excuse.
Personally, I don't mind if the City takes a bit of a hit. It has disproportionate influence over the rest of the UK and a slight weakening of the City's influence and wealth will (ideally) cause the country to bolster other industries (manufacturing). Never good to have too many eggs in one basket.
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 12074610)
I wish I could explain that one.
If passporting rights are lost, then you'd have to move bankers to Europe - not NY. It won't happen though - no one in their right mind would even think of moving their staff to the EU (inflexible labour laws, bonus caps, language issues etc) and the euro-work will still happen in London. I can only imagine that they are thinking that if London becomes a backwater, then they will move their people to NY. A decision they were probably going to do anyway - That said, if the currency stays this weak, then it may also make sense to keep them in London. |
Re: 1.26 and falling
Originally Posted by DXBtoDOH
(Post 12074616)
So it's likely an example of irrational overreaction? I wouldn't be surprised if it partly has to do with the extraordinarily high COL in London and NYC is now somewhat cheaper, and the bankers are using this as an excuse.
COL in UK has dropped significantly in most bank's reporting currency. |
Re: 1.26 and falling
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 12074610)
I wish I could explain that one.
If passporting rights are lost, then you'd have to move bankers to Europe - not NY. It won't happen though - no one in their right mind would even think of moving their staff to the EU (inflexible labour laws, bonus caps, language issues etc) and the euro-work will still happen in London. I can only imagine that they are thinking that if London becomes a backwater, then they will move their people to NY. A decision they were probably going to do anyway - That said, if the currency stays this weak, then it may also make sense to keep them in London. Coincidence? £ starting to slide again |
Re: 1.26 and falling
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 12074508)
Well that might also happen, but I doubt it - given that everyone else is starting to go down the protectionism route too.
I saw yesterday that while GDP growth in the UK has been one of the highest in the EU for a while, GDP per capita growth was some of the lowest and even behind Spain. Think about that... it means two things (i) we grew richer a lot slower than everyone else, (ii) our economic growth was driven mostly my imported labour expansion. As GDP also includes internal consumption, this is a very poor position to be in. Some export growth due to a low currency will do us well. or it could mean that the GDP was growing but the large levels of immigration meant that it was forcing down the level of GDP per capita. So it could be argued that too many immigrants were adding too little to the GDP. |
Re: 1.26 and falling
Originally Posted by Millhouse
(Post 12074610)
I wish I could explain that one.
If passporting rights are lost, then you'd have to move bankers to Europe - not NY. It won't happen though - no one in their right mind would even think of moving their staff to the EU (inflexible labour laws, bonus caps, language issues etc) and the euro-work will still happen in London. I can only imagine that they are thinking that if London becomes a backwater, then they will move their people to NY. A decision they were probably going to do anyway - That said, if the currency stays this weak, then it may also make sense to keep them in London. |
Re: 1.26 and falling
1.217 and sliding.
The whole world is short sterling, the manipulators have got their teeth into this and barring any policy change or BoE interest rate play this will go 1.15 at least. Shouldn't compare but we are now on the cusp of £10 a pint here. Oh and that 500 dirham note in your pocket is now worth 111 quid !!!!! |
Re: 1.26 and falling
100 quid is 450 aed! Ouch! 30 mins is now over 200 quid!!!!
|
Re: 1.26 and falling
Originally Posted by lightandbitter2
(Post 12074650)
now on the cusp of £10 a pint here.
Originally Posted by lightandbitter2
(Post 12074650)
policy change or BoE interest rate play
|
Re: 1.26 and falling
Originally Posted by iggle
(Post 12074655)
100 quid is 450 aed! Ouch! 30 mins is now over 200 quid!!!!
|
Re: 1.26 and falling
Originally Posted by KJinDoha
(Post 12074657)
£ per pint has always been my yardstick. After a few I'm not capable of recognise the value of QAR/AED.
A rate rise? A 0.25 rise would stop the speculators in their tracks. The country could cope with it, may even need it to head off upcoming inflation. I am not talking about a Lamont style balls up. |
Re: 1.26 and falling
Originally Posted by lightandbitter2
(Post 12074650)
1.217 and sliding.
The whole world is short sterling, the manipulators have got their teeth into this and barring any policy change or BoE interest rate play this will go 1.15 at least. Shouldn't compare but we are now on the cusp of £10 a pint here. Oh and that 500 dirham note in your pocket is now worth 111 quid !!!!! |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 7:03 pm. |
Powered by vBulletin: ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.