WWhere is the new George McGovern now that the anti-anti-islamofascist left needs hi
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <[email protected]>,
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Planet Visitor II wrote:
>
>
> > PIMPL [1]. Yeah, Craig... our "eduacational" system is really
> > failing.
> >
> > <clip claims of beating his dog into obedience>
> >
> > [1] Peed In My Pants Laughing.
> >
> >
> > Planet Visitor II
> > Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
> > http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
>
> Now I remember why I kill-filed this idiot! (Re-P-L-O-N-K)
So if you killfiled him, why did you see that post?
--
Mr Q. Z. D.
Remove luncheonmeat (truncheon) to reply.
" Everyone's always in favour of saving Hitler's brain.
But when you put it in the body of a great white shark,
ooohh! Suddenly you've gone too far!"
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Planet Visitor II wrote:
>
>
> > PIMPL [1]. Yeah, Craig... our "eduacational" system is really
> > failing.
> >
> > <clip claims of beating his dog into obedience>
> >
> > [1] Peed In My Pants Laughing.
> >
> >
> > Planet Visitor II
> > Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
> > http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
>
> Now I remember why I kill-filed this idiot! (Re-P-L-O-N-K)
So if you killfiled him, why did you see that post?
--
Mr Q. Z. D.
Remove luncheonmeat (truncheon) to reply.
" Everyone's always in favour of saving Hitler's brain.
But when you put it in the body of a great white shark,
ooohh! Suddenly you've gone too far!"
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mr Q. Z. Diablo wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Planet Visitor II wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>PIMPL [1]. Yeah, Craig... our "eduacational" system is really
>>>failing.
>>>
>>><clip claims of beating his dog into obedience>
>>>
>>>[1] Peed In My Pants Laughing.
>>>
>>>
>>>Planet Visitor II
>>>Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
>>>http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
>>
>>Now I remember why I kill-filed this idiot! (Re-P-L-O-N-K)
>
>
> So if you killfiled him, why did you see that post?
You don't understand "re-plonk"? Every once in a while I
clean out my killfile to remove all the vermin who have
moved on to other groups (or better yet, died) - this one
obviously got removed by mistake.
>
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Planet Visitor II wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>PIMPL [1]. Yeah, Craig... our "eduacational" system is really
>>>failing.
>>>
>>><clip claims of beating his dog into obedience>
>>>
>>>[1] Peed In My Pants Laughing.
>>>
>>>
>>>Planet Visitor II
>>>Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
>>>http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
>>
>>Now I remember why I kill-filed this idiot! (Re-P-L-O-N-K)
>
>
> So if you killfiled him, why did you see that post?
You don't understand "re-plonk"? Every once in a while I
clean out my killfile to remove all the vermin who have
moved on to other groups (or better yet, died) - this one
obviously got removed by mistake.
>
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Mr Q. Z. Diablo wrote:
>
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Planet Visitor II wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>PIMPL [1]. Yeah, Craig... our "eduacational" system is really
>>>>failing.
>>>>
>>>><clip claims of beating his dog into obedience>
>>>>
>>>>[1] Peed In My Pants Laughing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Planet Visitor II
>>>>Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
>>>>http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
>>>
>>>Now I remember why I kill-filed this idiot! (Re-P-L-O-N-K)
>>
>>
>> So if you killfiled him, why did you see that post?
>
> You don't understand "re-plonk"? Every once in a while I clean out my
> killfile to remove all the vermin who have moved on to other groups (or better
> yet, died) - this one obviously got removed by mistake.
I sense a great of hostility toward me. I suppose asking you for a
blowjob is now out of the question?
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Mr Q. Z. Diablo wrote:
>
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Planet Visitor II wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>PIMPL [1]. Yeah, Craig... our "eduacational" system is really
>>>>failing.
>>>>
>>>><clip claims of beating his dog into obedience>
>>>>
>>>>[1] Peed In My Pants Laughing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Planet Visitor II
>>>>Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
>>>>http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
>>>
>>>Now I remember why I kill-filed this idiot! (Re-P-L-O-N-K)
>>
>>
>> So if you killfiled him, why did you see that post?
>
> You don't understand "re-plonk"? Every once in a while I clean out my
> killfile to remove all the vermin who have moved on to other groups (or better
> yet, died) - this one obviously got removed by mistake.
I sense a great of hostility toward me. I suppose asking you for a
blowjob is now out of the question?
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Planet Visitor II wrote:
>
>> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hilary Karasz, spokeswoman for Public Health -- Seattle & King County,
>>>> said pets in restaurants "are of minimal health concern, because the
>>>> presence of a dog presents a low risk of food-borne illness," but some
>>>> people just find it annoying when dogs are sniffing around.
>>>
>>>
>>> I guess European dogs must be better trained! One scarcely notices their
>>> presence in restaurants until their owners get up to leave, and the dog
>>> appears from where it was quietly lying under the table. Personally, I'd far
>>> rather deal with fellow patrons' dogs than their obnoxious, undisciplined
>>> children! (But then, European children seem to be better trained, too.)
>>
>>
>> Well, when either a dog or a child is beaten into submission
>> in the home they tend to obey orders when they are taken
>> outside the home, mein Führer.
>
> However, whatever the animal (dogs, tigers, or human children) they respond
> best to affection! No parent/animal trainer of any intelligence relies upon
> intimidation, anymore. (Modern animal training consists of rewarding "good"
> behaviour, not punishing "bad".) Also, human children have even been shown to
> respond to appeals to reason - assuming their parents are capable of such.
My dear... the reason I have never asked you for a blowjob,
is that you have no feel for sarcasm.
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Planet Visitor II wrote:
>
>> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hilary Karasz, spokeswoman for Public Health -- Seattle & King County,
>>>> said pets in restaurants "are of minimal health concern, because the
>>>> presence of a dog presents a low risk of food-borne illness," but some
>>>> people just find it annoying when dogs are sniffing around.
>>>
>>>
>>> I guess European dogs must be better trained! One scarcely notices their
>>> presence in restaurants until their owners get up to leave, and the dog
>>> appears from where it was quietly lying under the table. Personally, I'd far
>>> rather deal with fellow patrons' dogs than their obnoxious, undisciplined
>>> children! (But then, European children seem to be better trained, too.)
>>
>>
>> Well, when either a dog or a child is beaten into submission
>> in the home they tend to obey orders when they are taken
>> outside the home, mein Führer.
>
> However, whatever the animal (dogs, tigers, or human children) they respond
> best to affection! No parent/animal trainer of any intelligence relies upon
> intimidation, anymore. (Modern animal training consists of rewarding "good"
> behaviour, not punishing "bad".) Also, human children have even been shown to
> respond to appeals to reason - assuming their parents are capable of such.
My dear... the reason I have never asked you for a blowjob,
is that you have no feel for sarcasm.
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <[email protected]>,
"Planet Visitor II" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> >
> > Planet Visitor II wrote:
> >
> >> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [email protected] wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hilary Karasz, spokeswoman for Public Health -- Seattle & King County,
> >>>> said pets in restaurants "are of minimal health concern, because the
> >>>> presence of a dog presents a low risk of food-borne illness," but some
> >>>> people just find it annoying when dogs are sniffing around.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I guess European dogs must be better trained! One scarcely notices their
> >>> presence in restaurants until their owners get up to leave, and the dog
> >>> appears from where it was quietly lying under the table. Personally, I'd
> >>> far
> >>> rather deal with fellow patrons' dogs than their obnoxious, undisciplined
> >>> children! (But then, European children seem to be better trained, too.)
> >>
> >>
> >> Well, when either a dog or a child is beaten into submission
> >> in the home they tend to obey orders when they are taken
> >> outside the home, mein FÃŒhrer.
> >
> > However, whatever the animal (dogs, tigers, or human children) they respond
> > best to affection! No parent/animal trainer of any intelligence relies
> > upon
> > intimidation, anymore. (Modern animal training consists of rewarding
> > "good"
> > behaviour, not punishing "bad".) Also, human children have even been shown
> > to
> > respond to appeals to reason - assuming their parents are capable of such.
>
> My dear... the reason I have never asked you for a blowjob,
> is that you have no feel for sarcasm.
Does that work? I'll spend more of my time looking for girls with no
understanding of sarcasm in that case.
--
Mr Q. Z. D.
Remove luncheonmeat (truncheon) to reply.
" Everyone's always in favour of saving Hitler's brain.
But when you put it in the body of a great white shark,
ooohh! Suddenly you've gone too far!"
"Planet Visitor II" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> >
> > Planet Visitor II wrote:
> >
> >> "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [email protected] wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hilary Karasz, spokeswoman for Public Health -- Seattle & King County,
> >>>> said pets in restaurants "are of minimal health concern, because the
> >>>> presence of a dog presents a low risk of food-borne illness," but some
> >>>> people just find it annoying when dogs are sniffing around.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I guess European dogs must be better trained! One scarcely notices their
> >>> presence in restaurants until their owners get up to leave, and the dog
> >>> appears from where it was quietly lying under the table. Personally, I'd
> >>> far
> >>> rather deal with fellow patrons' dogs than their obnoxious, undisciplined
> >>> children! (But then, European children seem to be better trained, too.)
> >>
> >>
> >> Well, when either a dog or a child is beaten into submission
> >> in the home they tend to obey orders when they are taken
> >> outside the home, mein FÃŒhrer.
> >
> > However, whatever the animal (dogs, tigers, or human children) they respond
> > best to affection! No parent/animal trainer of any intelligence relies
> > upon
> > intimidation, anymore. (Modern animal training consists of rewarding
> > "good"
> > behaviour, not punishing "bad".) Also, human children have even been shown
> > to
> > respond to appeals to reason - assuming their parents are capable of such.
>
> My dear... the reason I have never asked you for a blowjob,
> is that you have no feel for sarcasm.
Does that work? I'll spend more of my time looking for girls with no
understanding of sarcasm in that case.
--
Mr Q. Z. D.
Remove luncheonmeat (truncheon) to reply.
" Everyone's always in favour of saving Hitler's brain.
But when you put it in the body of a great white shark,
ooohh! Suddenly you've gone too far!"
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:39:58 +1100, "Mr Q. Z. Diablo"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> > However, whatever the animal (dogs, tigers, or human children) they respond
>> > best to affection! No parent/animal trainer of any intelligence relies
>> > upon
>> > intimidation, anymore. (Modern animal training consists of rewarding
>> > "good"
>> > behaviour, not punishing "bad".) Also, human children have even been shown
>> > to
>> > respond to appeals to reason - assuming their parents are capable of such.
>>
>> My dear... the reason I have never asked you for a blowjob,
>> is that you have no feel for sarcasm.
>
>Does that work? I'll spend more of my time looking for girls with no
>understanding of sarcasm in that case.
Girls?.....have you gone queer on me all of a sudden?
--
WooF w00f WooF
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> > However, whatever the animal (dogs, tigers, or human children) they respond
>> > best to affection! No parent/animal trainer of any intelligence relies
>> > upon
>> > intimidation, anymore. (Modern animal training consists of rewarding
>> > "good"
>> > behaviour, not punishing "bad".) Also, human children have even been shown
>> > to
>> > respond to appeals to reason - assuming their parents are capable of such.
>>
>> My dear... the reason I have never asked you for a blowjob,
>> is that you have no feel for sarcasm.
>
>Does that work? I'll spend more of my time looking for girls with no
>understanding of sarcasm in that case.
Girls?.....have you gone queer on me all of a sudden?
--
WooF w00f WooF
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:39:58 +1100, "Mr Q. Z. Diablo"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> > However, whatever the animal (dogs, tigers, or human children) they
>>> > respond
>>> > best to affection! No parent/animal trainer of any intelligence relies
>>> > upon
>>> > intimidation, anymore. (Modern animal training consists of rewarding
>>> > "good"
>>> > behaviour, not punishing "bad".) Also, human children have even been shown
>>> > to
>>> > respond to appeals to reason - assuming their parents are capable of such.
>>>
>>> My dear... the reason I have never asked you for a blowjob,
>>> is that you have no feel for sarcasm.
>>
>>Does that work? I'll spend more of my time looking for girls with no
>>understanding of sarcasm in that case.
>
> Girls?.....have you gone queer on me all of a sudden?
And here I've been spending all my life looking for girls
with an understanding of sarcasm.
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
> --
>
> WooF w00f WooF
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:39:58 +1100, "Mr Q. Z. Diablo"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> > However, whatever the animal (dogs, tigers, or human children) they
>>> > respond
>>> > best to affection! No parent/animal trainer of any intelligence relies
>>> > upon
>>> > intimidation, anymore. (Modern animal training consists of rewarding
>>> > "good"
>>> > behaviour, not punishing "bad".) Also, human children have even been shown
>>> > to
>>> > respond to appeals to reason - assuming their parents are capable of such.
>>>
>>> My dear... the reason I have never asked you for a blowjob,
>>> is that you have no feel for sarcasm.
>>
>>Does that work? I'll spend more of my time looking for girls with no
>>understanding of sarcasm in that case.
>
> Girls?.....have you gone queer on me all of a sudden?
And here I've been spending all my life looking for girls
with an understanding of sarcasm.
Planet Visitor II
Official publisher of AADP Official dictionary
http://www.planetvisitor.name/dictionary.html
> --
>
> WooF w00f WooF




