Go Back  British Expats > Usenet Groups > rec.travel.* > rec.travel.europe
Reload this Page >

Sweden doesn't have an army!

Wikiposts

Sweden doesn't have an army!

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 2:43 am
  #16  
Tim Challenger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:59:26 GMT, a.spencer3 wrote:

    > "Tim Challenger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:1098870859.flJDHEqkgSP72ApHher9bA@teranews...
    >> On 26 Oct 2004 16:26:18 -0600, Bill Moore wrote:
    >>> God forbid someone should have to ever explain the difference
    >>> between Slovakia and Slovenia to him!
    >> He's probably been informed by the same people that help CNN :
    >> http://www.alpineroads.com/general/switzerland.jpg
    >
    > I don't believe that!
    > Yes I do ...............
    > (Answer available for Bush when he replies).

afaik it's a genuine photo.

--
Tim C.
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 2:47 am
  #17  
A.Spencer3
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

"Bill Moore" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
    > >"Tim Challenger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > >news:1098870859.flJDHEqkgSP72ApHher9bA@teranews.. .
    > >> On 26 Oct 2004 16:26:18 -0600, Bill Moore wrote:
    > >>
    > >> > God forbid someone should have to ever explain the difference
    > >> > between Slovakia and Slovenia to him!
    > >>
    > >> He's probably been informed by the same people that help CNN :
    > >>
    > >> http://www.alpineroads.com/general/switzerland.jpg
    > It was just filling in while Austria was vacationing.

Or the Czech Republic, maybe?

Surreyman
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 3:06 am
  #18  
Gregory Morrow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

Jeroen Wijnands wrote:

    > Keith Willshaw wrote:
    > >
    > > "Bill Moore" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > >> Last week's Sunday NY Times magazine had an interesting
    > >> article called "Without A Doubt" about the Bush
    > >> Administration and the air of certainty they often have
    > >> about things that is rooted in their religious attitudes.
    > >>
    > >> There was mention of a meeting with California Congressman
    > >> Tom Lantos (I believe he is the only Holocaust survivor in the
    > >> US Congress) and they were discussing the possibility of sending
    > >> peacekeeping troops to help with Israel/Palestine and they were
    > >> trying to come up with countries that might be good candidates
    > >> for troops and Lantos suggested the Scandanavian countries,
    > >> Sweden in particular. Bush's response was "Sweden is the neutral
    > >> one. They don't have an army." Lantos said that Bush must have thought
    > >> he said *Switzerland*
    > >
    > > Then Lantos is just as ignorant. Switzerland has a rather
    > > large army for its size. Every able bodied male of
    > > military age is required to undertake annual miltary
    > > training and keep his uniform and rifle at home.
    > >
    > And as to sweden not having an army:
    > http://www.mil.se/?lang=E
    > It's even one of the few countries that still develops it's own
    > aircrafts.


Yep, IIRC the Czechs have just brought Swedish fighters for their air
force...

There is a reason why Sweden has been able to stay neutral all these years
    :-)

--
Best
Greg
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 3:58 am
  #19  
Magda
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

On 27 Oct 2004 08:37:57 -0600, in rec.travel.europe, [email protected] (Bill Moore)
arranged some electrons, so they looked like this :

...
... Hey, we're not *all* that way.

I know, and I'm glad, believe me.
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 4:06 am
  #20  
Go Fig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

In article <[email protected]>, Bill Moore
<[email protected]> wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Mark Hewitt <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > >"Jeroen Wijnands" <[email protected]> wrote in
    > >message news:[email protected]...
    > >> Keith Willshaw wrote:
    > >>
    > >> And as to sweden not having an army:
    > >> http://www.mil.se/?lang=E
    > >> It's even one of the few countries that still develops it's own
    > >> aircrafts.
    > >
    > >It's navy also devlops its own warships. They are investing in stealth
    > >technology at the moment I believe.
    >
    > Yes. The point really is that the president of the US couldn't
    > distinguish Sweden from Switzerland.

Hardly, the real point is that the NYT can NOT be the sole source of
info.

Look at their reporting about the 40 odd truck loads of high explosives
that they said were missing and implied negligence... it appears that
they went missing before the 101st even arrived on scene... this was
confirmed by a NBC imbedded reporter who was with the 101st at the
time.

So lets see; both HMX and RD, a very high explosive have gone missing
and can't be found... hum... what else may be missing and can't be
found?

jay
Wed Oct 27, 2004
mailto:[email protected]
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 4:19 am
  #21  
nitram
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:06:03 -0700, Go Fig <[email protected]> wrote:


    >So lets see; both HMX and RD, a very high explosive have gone missing
    >and can't be found... hum... what else may be missing and can't be
    >found?

WMDs by the thousand?
--
Martin
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 4:22 am
  #22  
Go Fig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

In article <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]> wrote:

    > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:06:03 -0700, Go Fig <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >
    > >So lets see; both HMX and RD, a very high explosive have gone missing
    > >and can't be found... hum... what else may be missing and can't be
    > >found?
    >
    > WMDs by the thousand?

Humm, how many anthrax spores you think might fit into 40 trucks ?

jay
Wed Oct 27, 2004
mailto:[email protected]
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 5:58 am
  #23  
Bill Moore
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

In article <271020040906034773%[email protected]>, Go Fig <[email protected]> wrote:
    >In article <[email protected]>, Bill Moore
    ><[email protected]> wrote:
    >> In article <[email protected]>,
    >> Mark Hewitt <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >
    >> >"Jeroen Wijnands" <[email protected]> wrote in
    >> >message news:[email protected]...
    >> >> Keith Willshaw wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> And as to sweden not having an army:
    >> >> http://www.mil.se/?lang=E
    >> >> It's even one of the few countries that still develops it's own
    >> >> aircrafts.
    >> >
    >> >It's navy also devlops its own warships. They are investing in stealth
    >> >technology at the moment I believe.
    >>
    >> Yes. The point really is that the president of the US couldn't
    >> distinguish Sweden from Switzerland.
    >Hardly, the real point is that the NYT can NOT be the sole source of
    >info.

I think that fact that the US president seems to be a fool is a point of
interest. Attacking the messenger only goes so far...


    >Look at their reporting about the 40 odd truck loads of high explosives
    >that they said were missing and implied negligence... it appears that
    >they went missing before the 101st even arrived on scene... this was
    >confirmed by a NBC imbedded reporter who was with the 101st at the
    >time.
    >So lets see; both HMX and RD, a very high explosive have gone missing
    >and can't be found... hum... what else may be missing and can't be
    >found?
    >jay
    >Wed Oct 27, 2004
    >mailto:[email protected]
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 6:01 am
  #24  
Bill Moore
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

In article <[email protected]>,
a.spencer3 <[email protected]> wrote:
    >"Bill Moore" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >> >"Tim Challenger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >> >news:1098870859.flJDHEqkgSP72ApHher9bA@teranews.. .
    >> >> On 26 Oct 2004 16:26:18 -0600, Bill Moore wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> > God forbid someone should have to ever explain the difference
    >> >> > between Slovakia and Slovenia to him!
    >> >>
    >> >> He's probably been informed by the same people that help CNN :
    >> >>
    >> >> http://www.alpineroads.com/general/switzerland.jpg
    >> It was just filling in while Austria was vacationing.
    >Or the Czech Republic, maybe?

Oops, you're right ;-)
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 6:01 am
  #25  
Jeremy Henderson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

On 2004-10-27 00:26:18 +0200, [email protected] (Bill Moore) said:
    >
    > Some weeks later Lantos ran into Bush, who said to him, "You were
    > right, Sweden does have an army."

Luckily they do - I eked out a meagre existence in Sweden with the help
of Swedish army surplus nettle soup.

Delicious.

J;


--
Encrypted e-mail address. Click to mail me:
http://cerbermail.com/?nKYh3qN4YG
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 6:12 am
  #26  
Go Fig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

In article <[email protected]>, Bill Moore
<[email protected]> wrote:

    > In article <271020040906034773%[email protected]>, Go Fig <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >In article <[email protected]>, Bill Moore
    > ><[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > >> In article <[email protected]>,
    > >> Mark Hewitt <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >> >
    > >> >"Jeroen Wijnands" <[email protected]> wrote in
    > >> >message news:[email protected]...
    > >> >> Keith Willshaw wrote:
    > >> >>
    > >> >> And as to sweden not having an army:
    > >> >> http://www.mil.se/?lang=E
    > >> >> It's even one of the few countries that still develops it's own
    > >> >> aircrafts.
    > >> >
    > >> >It's navy also devlops its own warships. They are investing in stealth
    > >> >technology at the moment I believe.
    > >>
    > >> Yes. The point really is that the president of the US couldn't
    > >> distinguish Sweden from Switzerland.
    > >
    > >Hardly, the real point is that the NYT can NOT be the sole source of
    > >info.
    >
    > I think that fact that the US president seems to be a fool is a point of
    > interest. Attacking the messenger only goes so far...


Show a source please, not a singular one either !

jay
Wed Oct 27, 2004
mailto:[email protected]

    >
    >
    > >Look at their reporting about the 40 odd truck loads of high explosives
    > >that they said were missing and implied negligence... it appears that
    > >they went missing before the 101st even arrived on scene... this was
    > >confirmed by a NBC imbedded reporter who was with the 101st at the
    > >time.
    > >
    > >So lets see; both HMX and RD, a very high explosive have gone missing
    > >and can't be found... hum... what else may be missing and can't be
    > >found?
    > >
    > >jay
    > >Wed Oct 27, 2004
    > >mailto:[email protected]
    >
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 6:14 am
  #27  
jbk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

    >>> Yes. The point really is that the president of the US couldn't
    >>> distinguish Sweden from Switzerland.
    >>Hardly, the real point is that the NYT can NOT be the sole source of
    >>info.
    >I think that fact that the US president seems to be a fool is a point of
    >interest. Attacking the messenger only goes so far...

How about the fact that you seem to be a fool by posting such silly
crap? Is that of interest too?
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 7:00 am
  #28  
Anonymouse
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

sweden doesn't have an army that's good for anything.

though the old swedish 1896 mausers sure are sweet old guns.

100 years old, just been surplused, and hardly any wear at all.

Bill Moore wrote:

    > Last week's Sunday NY Times magazine had an interesting
    > article called "Without A Doubt" about the Bush
    > Administration and the air of certainty they often have
    > about things that is rooted in their religious attitudes.
    >
    > There was mention of a meeting with California Congressman
    > Tom Lantos (I believe he is the only Holocaust survivor in the
    > US Congress) and they were discussing the possibility of sending
    > peacekeeping troops to help with Israel/Palestine and they were
    > trying to come up with countries that might be good candidates
    > for troops and Lantos suggested the Scandanavian countries,
    > Sweden in particular. Bush's response was "Sweden is the neutral
    > one. They don't have an army." Lantos said that Bush must have thought
    > he said *Switzerland* and noted that actually they do have a
    > national defense. Bush persisted, insisting that Sweden has no
    > army, and the room was quiet until someone changed the subject.
    > Some weeks later Lantos ran into Bush, who said to him, "You were
    > right, Sweden does have an army."
    >
    > God forbid someone should have to ever explain the difference
    > between Slovakia and Slovenia to him!
    >

--


*Lienad .45/.410 Single Shot Derringer Parts KiT*
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7110249760
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 7:02 am
  #29  
Anonymouse
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

now THAT is a good one!

Magda wrote:

    > ... He's probably been informed by the same people that help CNN :
    > ...
    > ... http://www.alpineroads.com/general/switzerland.jpg

you do know what CNN stands for don't you?

Clinton News Network

--


*Lienad .45/.410 Single Shot Derringer Parts KiT*
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7110249760
 
Old Oct 27th 2004 | 7:05 am
  #30  
Bill Moore
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sweden doesn't have an army!

In article <271020041112330143%[email protected]>, Go Fig <[email protected]> wrote:
    >In article <[email protected]>, Bill Moore
    ><[email protected]> wrote:
    >> In article <271020040906034773%[email protected]>, Go Fig <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >In article <[email protected]>, Bill Moore
    >> ><[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >
    >> >> In article <[email protected]>,
    >> >> Mark Hewitt <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> >> >
    >> >> >"Jeroen Wijnands" <[email protected]> wrote in
    >> >> >message news:[email protected]...
    >> >> >> Keith Willshaw wrote:
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >> And as to sweden not having an army:
    >> >> >> http://www.mil.se/?lang=E
    >> >> >> It's even one of the few countries that still develops it's own
    >> >> >> aircrafts.
    >> >> >
    >> >> >It's navy also devlops its own warships. They are investing in stealth
    >> >> >technology at the moment I believe.
    >> >>
    >> >> Yes. The point really is that the president of the US couldn't
    >> >> distinguish Sweden from Switzerland.
    >> >
    >> >Hardly, the real point is that the NYT can NOT be the sole source of
    >> >info.
    >>
    >> I think that fact that the US president seems to be a fool is a point of
    >> interest. Attacking the messenger only goes so far...
    >Show a source please, not a singular one either !

So you think the NY Times writer is telling a baldfaced lie?

You haven't gotten any inkling over the past 4 years that
Bush might be a dummy?
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.