"gernot almen" <[email protected]> kirjoitti
viestissä:[email protected]...
>> I don't know if you simply must go to Rome in Aug/Sep, but I am
>> avoiding that part of the world at that time due to serious terrorist
>> threat.
>>
>> Chances are that something will happen in Iran, Iraq, etc and major
>> European cities will be most vulnerable.
>
> Because?
>
> Evidence?
>
> Why are European cities more vulnerable than US cities?
>
Why crossposting?

Tim C. wrote:

> Following up to Deeply Filled Mortician
> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> :
>
>
>>America must be safer, coz they're doing something about the threat.
>
>
> What? Are they going to get rid of Bush at last?

No matter what, he is gone in Jan 2009.

Deeply Filled Mortician wrote:

> Make credence recognised that on Thu, 03 May 2007 10:09:19 -0700, Mike
> Hunt <postmaster@localhost> has scripted:
>
>
>>Tim C. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Following up to Deeply Filled Mortician
>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>America must be safer, coz they're doing something about the threat.
>>>
>>>
>>>What? Are they going to get rid of Bush at last?
>>
>>No matter what, he is gone in Jan 2009.
>
>
> To be replaced by Cheney, Wolfowitz or that black bitch in white
> clothing.

Cheesy and the wolf man have no chance of ever being nominated. Rice
would be an incredible long shot.

Make credence recognised that on Thu, 03 May 2007 10:09:19 -0700, Mike
Hunt <postmaster@localhost> has scripted:

>Tim C. wrote:
>
>> Following up to Deeply Filled Mortician
>> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> :
>>
>>
>>>America must be safer, coz they're doing something about the threat.
>>
>>
>> What? Are they going to get rid of Bush at last?
>
>No matter what, he is gone in Jan 2009.

To be replaced by Cheney, Wolfowitz or that black bitch in white
clothing.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--

Deeply Filled Mortician wrote:
> Make credence recognised that on Thu, 03 May 2007 10:09:19 -0700, Mike
> Hunt <postmaster@localhost> has scripted:
>
>
>>Tim C. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Following up to Deeply Filled Mortician
>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>America must be safer, coz they're doing something about the threat.
>>>
>>>
>>>What? Are they going to get rid of Bush at last?
>>
>>No matter what, he is gone in Jan 2009.
>
>
> To be replaced by Cheney, Wolfowitz or that black bitch in white
> clothing.

Do you think a Republican party candidate stands a chance?

Make credence recognised that on Thu, 03 May 2007 15:35:34 -0700, Mike
Hunt <postmaster@localhost> has scripted:

>Deeply Filled Mortician wrote:
>> Make credence recognised that on Thu, 03 May 2007 10:09:19 -0700, Mike
>> Hunt <postmaster@localhost> has scripted:
>>
>>
>>>Tim C. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Following up to Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>America must be safer, coz they're doing something about the threat.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>What? Are they going to get rid of Bush at last?
>>>
>>>No matter what, he is gone in Jan 2009.
>>
>>
>> To be replaced by Cheney, Wolfowitz or that black bitch in white
>> clothing.
>
>Do you think a Republican party candidate stands a chance?

I never thought Bush stood a chance of being re-elected until I saw it
with my own eyes.

Why they keep being relevant, decade after decade, is a question for
those who can vote on the matter.

Oh, and yes, Americans are ****ing idiots.
--
---
DFM - http://www.deepfriedmars.com
---
--

Mike Hunt wrote:

> Deeply Filled Mortician wrote:
>
>> Make credence recognised that on Thu, 03 May 2007 10:09:19 -0700, Mike
>> Hunt <postmaster@localhost> has scripted:
>>
>>
>>> Tim C. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Following up to Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> America must be safer, coz they're doing something about the threat.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What? Are they going to get rid of Bush at last?
>>>
>>>
>>> No matter what, he is gone in Jan 2009.
>>
>>
>>
>> To be replaced by Cheney, Wolfowitz or that black bitch in white
>> clothing.
>
>
> Do you think a Republican party candidate stands a chance?

Of course. Do not underestimate either the capacity of the Publicans to
panic folks with lies or the ability of the Democrats to muck up a sure
thing.

Frank F. Matthews wrote:


> Of course. Do not underestimate either the capacity of the Publicans to
> panic folks with lies or the ability of the Democrats to muck up a sure
> thing.
>

I heard a reporter asked Ms Rice to a game of tic-tac-toe and all she
wanted to do was play Global Thermal Nuclear War.. She kept saying,
"Shall we play a game?' I think she kept calling the reporter "Joshua"

Mike Hunt wrote:

> Deeply Filled Mortician wrote:
>
>> Make credence recognised that on Thu, 03 May 2007 10:09:19 -0700, Mike
>> Hunt <postmaster@localhost> has scripted:
>>
>>
>>> Tim C. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Following up to Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> America must be safer, coz they're doing something about the threat.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What? Are they going to get rid of Bush at last?
>>>
>>>
>>> No matter what, he is gone in Jan 2009.
>>
>>
>>
>> To be replaced by Cheney, Wolfowitz or that black bitch in white
>> clothing.
>
>
> Do you think a Republican party candidate stands a chance?

Certainly. I do not doubt the ability of Publican PR flaks to terrify
large numbers of voters with fantasies.

Nor do I doubt the ability of Democrats to stage such confusion that
they blow a sure thing.

Waiving the right to remain silent, "Frank F. Matthews"
<[email protected]> said:

> Certainly. I do not doubt the ability of Publican PR flaks to terrify
> large numbers of voters with fantasies.
>
> Nor do I doubt the ability of Democrats to stage such confusion that
> they blow a sure thing.

See "Global Warming"

--
Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail

"A lack of common sense is now considered a disability,
with all the privileges that this entails."

On Sat, 05 May 2007 12:28:53 -0400, "Frank F. Matthews"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Mike Hunt wrote:

Oh no! Not this early!

It's going to be bad enough next year.

Alan, Australia

http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
latest: Venice, Aquileia and Trieste
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/

On Sat, 05 May 2007 22:59:11 GMT, Alan S <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On Sat, 05 May 2007 12:28:53 -0400, "Frank F. Matthews"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Mike Hunt wrote:
>
>Oh no! Not this early!
>
>It's going to be bad enough next year.

Hell. Obama already has Secret Service protection.

(So does Clinton, but she has it for being a past first lady.)


--
************* DAVE HATUNEN ([email protected]) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

On Sat, 05 May 2007 23:20:13 -0700, Hatunen <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Sat, 05 May 2007 22:59:11 GMT, Alan S <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 05 May 2007 12:28:53 -0400, "Frank F. Matthews"
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Mike Hunt wrote:
>>
>>Oh no! Not this early!
>>
>>It's going to be bad enough next year.
>
>Hell. Obama already has Secret Service protection.
>
>(So does Clinton, but she has it for being a past first lady.)

PLONK subject.
--

Martin

On May 5, 11:28 pm, "Frank F. Matthews"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Mike Hunt wrote:
> > Deeply Filled Mortician wrote:
>
> >> Make credence recognised that on Thu, 03 May 2007 10:09:19 -0700, Mike
> >> Hunt <postmaster@localhost> has scripted:
>
> >>> Tim C. wrote:
>
> >>>> Following up to Deeply Filled Mortician
> >>>> <deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> :
>
> >>>>> America must be safer, coz they're doing something about the threat.
>
> >>>> What? Are they going to get rid of Bush at last?
>
> >>> No matter what, he is gone in Jan 2009.
>
> >> To be replaced by Cheney, Wolfowitz or that black bitch in white
> >> clothing.
>
> > Do you think a Republican party candidate stands a chance?
>
> Certainly. I do not doubt the ability of Publican PR flaks to terrify
> large numbers of voters with fantasies.
>
> Nor do I doubt the ability of Democrats to stage such confusion that
> they blow a sure thing.

Americans historically like to switch parties in the White House every
8 years (since the Constitution was amended to only allow 2 terms).
Only Reagan was able to change that.

Thus the election is the Democrats to lose. That's why the Republicans
are keeping their mouths shut right now. Their only hope is that the
Dems will do something idiotic like nominate Hillary.

Personally I'd like to see Richardson as President. Experienced,
knowledgeable, moderate. Ain't got a chance.

Richardson vs. Thompson in November, 2008. Now *THAT* would be an
election!

Tchiowa wrote:

> On May 5, 11:28 pm, "Frank F. Matthews"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Mike Hunt wrote:
>>
>>>Deeply Filled Mortician wrote:
>>
>>>>Make credence recognised that on Thu, 03 May 2007 10:09:19 -0700, Mike
>>>>Hunt <postmaster@localhost> has scripted:
>>
>>>>>Tim C. wrote:
>>
>>>>>>Following up to Deeply Filled Mortician
>>>>>><deepfreudmoors@eITmISaACTUALLYiREAL!l.nu> :
>>
>>>>>>>America must be safer, coz they're doing something about the threat.
>>
>>>>>>What? Are they going to get rid of Bush at last?
>>
>>>>>No matter what, he is gone in Jan 2009.
>>
>>>>To be replaced by Cheney, Wolfowitz or that black bitch in white
>>>>clothing.
>>
>>>Do you think a Republican party candidate stands a chance?
>>
>>Certainly. I do not doubt the ability of Publican PR flaks to terrify
>>large numbers of voters with fantasies.
>>
>>Nor do I doubt the ability of Democrats to stage such confusion that
>>they blow a sure thing.
>
>
> Americans historically like to switch parties in the White House every
> 8 years (since the Constitution was amended to only allow 2 terms).
> Only Reagan was able to change that.

Carter was only president for 4 years. So, that didn't follow the 8
years of "historically".